Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

Patrick Coffey

Ref: 2025-0343 Date: 7 Jul 2025 Coroner: Robert Simpson Area: Berkshire Responses identified: 1 / 1 View PDF

Inadequate and inconsistent recording of patient repositioning, with significant gaps in documentation, suggests patients, especially those at risk of chest infections or pressure damage, are not repositioned as required.

Date 7 Jul 2025
56-day deadline 1 Sep 2025 est.
Responses identified 1 of 1
Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

Coroner's concerns

AI summary
Inadequate and inconsistent recording of patient repositioning, with significant gaps in documentation, suggests patients, especially those at risk of chest infections or pressure damage, are not repositioned as required.
View full coroner's concerns
I heard evidence that it was important that Mr Coffey spent most of his time in a seated position rather than lying down. This was to assist with his ability to breathe more deeply and cough more effectively; both of which are of importance when treating chest infections especially in the context of a patient with rib fractures. The nursing witness for the trust confirmed that Mr Coffey should have been repositioned every 2-4 hours. It had been identified by the hospital during random monthly audits that this was either nor being done or not being properly recorded for some patients. Frimley Trust, after the inquest concluded, provided confirmation of when Mr Coffey’s position was recorded during his stay. These reveal that on certain days almost no information is recorded and on other days it is possible to know his position on a 2-4 hourly basis. Of particular note is the following:
1. There is no record of his position from 16.39 on the 15/9/2024 to 06.51 on the 16/09/24,
2. The only record between 19.11 on the 16/9/24 and 04.18 on the 18/9/24 is one entry at 06.23 on the 17/9/24
3. The only record between 22.26 on the 18/9/24 and 01.51 on the 20/9/24 is one entry at 10.34 on the 19/9/24
4. There are only 2 entries for the 22/9/24 at 06.06 & 22.11
5. The entries for the 24/9/24 cease at 14.08 and they do not restart until 12.24 on the 25/9/24
6. The last entry on the 25/9/24 is at 14.35 and the next entry is not until 17.59 on the 26/9/24
7. The final entry on the 26/9/24 is at 20.54 and the first entry on the 27/9/24 is at 10.03. These records therefore have gaps of up to 27 hours. In addition the vast majority of records that do exist do not reveal whether Mr Coffey was actually repositioned as only one position is recorded. It is only on about 7 or 8 occasions that a repositioning has been recorded. The medical records from the hospital do not show repositioning every 2-4 hours and I found that Mr Coffey was probably not repositioned as required. In the particular circumstances of Mr Coffey this did not contribute to his death lack of repositioning does give rise to a risk of future deaths of those suffering from chest infections or, indeed, those particularly at risk of pressure damage.

Responses

1 respondent
Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust NHS / Health Body
1 Sep 2025 PDF
Action Planned

The Trust is implementing the National Pressure Injury Screening Tool, and reviewing the SSKIN care bundle and repositioning documentation; working with EPIC National Team to review current output documents provided to Coroners to improve clarity, structure, and usability of these records. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Mr Simpson REF: YOUR REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS DATED 07 JULY 2025 I write further and in response to the Regulation 28 Report received on 07 July 2025, following the sad death of Mr Patrick Coffey on 29 September 2024. My deepest sympathies go out to Mr Coffey’s family and those who knew him. I am grateful for your thorough inquest into Mr Coffey’s death. I would like to take this opportunity to reassure you that patient safety is taken very seriously by the Trust, and the Trust is committed to review and reflect on current practices to identify areas of improvement. I have carefully considered your observations, and the recommendations raised in your Regulation 28 Report to ensure that patients receive the best quality care at the Trust and that future deaths are prevented. Matter of Concern 1: Repositioning Protocols The Trust has an established Pressure Injury Reduction improvement work stream which is being led by the Corporate Head of Nursing as the Senior Responsible Officer which includes the clinical importance of repositioning for patients at risk of respiratory compromise and pressure injury. At the time of Mr Coffey’s admission, repositioning protocols were supported by Waterlow assessments and physiotherapy documentation including repositioning records as part of the daily care plans within the Electronic Patient Record.

The improvement work stream is focussing on implementing a number of changes which will improve care and documentation across the Trust relating to repositioning and the prevention of pressure damage including the following:

 From 1 September 2025, the NaƟonal Pressure Injury Screening Tool, Purpose T, will be implemented across adult inpaƟent and emergency departments, with maternity and paediatrics to follow later in December 2025. Through this period of change, the Trust will adopt the naƟonally recommended ulcer categories and care pathways, alongside a review of data validaƟon processes. The Nursing, Midwifery and Therapies Board, will be monitoring the progress and the governance processes with escalaƟon through established documentaƟon and digital safety groups, and in due course a Trust-wide audit will be planned, with re-audiƟng scheduled to provide internal assurance.  While Purpose T recommends reposiƟoning, it does not prompt it directly. Accordingly, we have worked with our electronic paƟent record (“EPR”) supplier EPIC to introduce task prompts at defined intervals, visible on the care plan interface to support compliance (as below). This work forms part of a broader pressure ulcer improvement programme aligned with the NaƟonal Wound Care Strategy.  This Pressure Ulcer Improvement Programme is recognised as part of the Trust’s PaƟent Safety Incident Response Framework (“PSIRF”) Plan and is a Trust Quality Improvement Priority for 2025–26.  Awareness will be further supported through parƟcipaƟon in naƟonal iniƟaƟves such as Stop the Pressure Week in November 2025. The improvement work stream has been monitoring data as part of its Quality Improvement Methodology and for Quarter 1 2025/26 performance has significantly improved particularly for Category 2 pressure injuries with a 52% reduction compared to the same quarter last year. Matter of Concern 2: Staff Training and Awareness To support clinical teams, we have introduced system-driven prompts within the EPR that will automatically trigger repositioning tasks when patient pathways are documented. These appear on the care plan interface to ensure integration into routine workflows. For clarity, this prompt will not be recorded in the printed patient records, rather it will appear as an alert on screen for staff to take action. These prompts will be auditable on a ward and patient level, with staff able to pull through repositioning information onto a dashboard for reporting and auditing purposes. The Trust has also launched a targeted staff communication campaign, including the distribution of an EPR Bulletin to all relevant clinical teams, these are regularly shared to highlight key educational messages to staff. I understand that the Bulletin reinforcing the importance of timely and accurate documentation of patient repositioning was shared with your office in early July. To further support staff, the Trust has expanded our Digital Ambassadors Network, providing peer-to-peer training and access to ‘training buddies’ who can assist with EPR-related queries and reinforce best practice.

Education sessions have also been delivered, and in addition the Trust Clinical Education and Practice Development Teams have been visited wards to support staff in practice with documentation of repositioning, risk assessments and using EPIC effectively. A formal Harm Free Care Audit Programme is in place (commenced July 2025). The pressure injury prevention sections tests out whether assessments have been done in a timely manner and whether the appropriate care interventions such as repositioning have been put in place. The audit in July 25 showed a 20% improvement in the documentation of the interventions from a previous audit (60% to 80%) compliance. Matter of Concern 3: Electronic Patient Record Your concern about the clarity and completeness of EPRs, particularly in relation to the documentation of patient repositioning, has been noted. We recognise the importance of ensuring that clinical records are both accurate and accessible, especially when reviewed in the context of coronial investigations. The Trust acknowledges that the version of the records disclosed to the Court differ in appearance from the user-interface that staff access, which can be challenging at inquests. To address this, the Trust is working directly with EPIC National Team to review the current output documents provided to Coroners. The objective of this review is to enhance the clarity, structure, and usability of these records, ensuring they support the coroner’s review process effectively. In parallel, we are engaging in a collaborative learning initiative with the wider EPIC user network to understand common challenges in presenting electronic clinical notes ‘off system’ and identifying best practices to be adopted locally. Further, the Trust remain open to meet with the Senior Coroner for Berkshire to discuss this matter further. I hope that my response highlights the steps that the Trust has and will continue to take to improve the patient safety at the Trust, in particular repositioning which falls under the Pressure Injury Reduction improvement work stream. An improvement plan based on learning from this inquest, to include the actions above, will be created and actioned with monitoring by the appropriate clinical governance teams within the Trust. The Trust appreciates your thorough investigation and challenge, both of which are essential so that the Trust can continue to learn lessons and take steps to improve patient safety and the quality of care we provide our patients. As ever, my thoughts remain with Mr Coffey’s family and all those affected by his very sad death.

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
On 01 October 2024 I commenced an investigation into the death of Patrick Anthony COFFEY aged 85. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 06 June 2025. The conclusion of the inquest was that: On the 29th September 2024 Patrick Anthony Coffey died at Wexham Park Hospital, Slough. He fell at home on the 12th September fracturing multiple ribs and remained on the floor until the following day contracting a chest infection. He was admitted to hospital for treatment but continued to deteriorate.
Circumstances of the death
As a result of falling at home Mr Coffey fractured multiple ribs and remained on the floor for about 17 hours. On arrival at hospital he was found to have contracted a chest infection. He suffered from COPD which did not usually affect his life and he was mobile prior to the fall. He was assessed in hospital and it was decided to treat the fractures conservatively. This required effective pain control which was not always offered or achieved. He did undergo 2 periods of local anaethesia infusions which were more effective in controlling the pain. He was treated with anitbiotics for the chest infection throughout his stay.

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Related inquiry recommendations

Similar themes

Report details

Reference
2025-0343
Date of report
7 July 2025
Coroner
Robert Simpson
Coroner area
Berkshire

Responses identified

Responses identified 1 of 1
All listed responses identified

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 1 Sep 2025 (estimated).

Sent to

Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust

Source links