Completed
· Chair: Lord Hardie
· Established July 2014
· Commissioned by Scottish Government
Public inquiry into why the Edinburgh Trams project was delivered late, over budget, and with a reduced scope.
More about this inquiry
Public inquiry into why the Edinburgh Trams project was delivered late, over budget, and with a reduced scope. The project cost £776m against an original estimate of £375m and took 5 years longer than planned.
Accepted · No statement from City of Edinburgh Council found
Recommended
In recognition of the various difficulties likely to be experienced in the design and construction of a light rail project through a city centre, the promoter and owner of the project should appoint as its procurement and project manager a company with suitably qualified and experienced permanent employees that has delivered a similar project successfully on time and within budget or can demonstrate that it will be able to do so.
Since then (summary written by this site)
In December 2023, Andrew Kerr, Chief Executive of the City of Edinburgh Council, recommended that it adopt the recommendation, noting that the inquiry report highlighted insufficient delivery experience to assure proper management (Andrew Kerr response, Dec 2023). He stated that procurement and project management is "key to success" and that demonstrable experience should be secured as part of light rail delivery (Andrew Kerr response, Dec 2023). The record holds no update since the Council's response of December 2023 (Andrew Kerr response, Dec 2023).
Addressed to City of Edinburgh Council · Full record
Accepted · No statement from City of Edinburgh Council found
Recommended
Immediately following the appointment of the designer, and throughout the design of the project, the designer should engage with the promoter and owner of the project, the procurement and project manager, the local planning authority, the utility companies and interested third parties owning land that may be affected by the project to clarify their design criteria. In such discussions throughout the design of the project the promoter and owner of the project should co-ordinate responses to the various stages of design and, in doing so, should take into account the competing interests of different parties and of various departments within any local authority exercising different statutory functions as well as the significance of the project in the context of the community as a whole and should provide all necessary assistance and clear and timeous instructions to the designer to avoid delays and additional expense. In that regard:
• prior to the appointment of the designer the local planning authority ought to produce sufficiently detailed design guidelines to enable the designer to take them into account from the outset when designing the tram network and to improve the prospects of obtaining the necessary consents and approvals without requiring repeated re-submission of designs that will result in delay to the project with resultant expense;
• throughout the project a collaborative approach should be adopted by the promoter and owner to achieve an early resolution of any design issues that arise; and
• the promoter and owner should assume primary responsibility for co-ordinating the local authority’s response and for negotiating the resolution of all issues to enable clear instructions to be issued to the designer and to avoid re-design of sections of the route following reconsideration of matters that have been resolved at an earlier stage.
Since then (summary written by this site)
In December 2023, Andrew Kerr, Chief Executive of the City of Edinburgh Council, recommended that it adopt the recommendation to produce detailed design guidance, collaborate with the designer, and coordinate responses to design queries, noting that the absence of a single point of contact prior to mediation had led to confusion regarding its position (Andrew Kerr response, Dec 2023). The record holds no update since the City of Edinburgh Council's response of December 2023 (Andrew Kerr response, Dec 2023).
Addressed to City of Edinburgh Council · Full record
Accepted · No statement from City of Edinburgh Council found
Recommended
The governance structure for the delivery of a major project such as a light rail scheme should follow the published guidance and should ensure that there is clarity regarding the respective roles of the various bodies and individuals involved in its delivery. In particular, the chairman of the company responsible for the procurement and management of the project should not also be its chief executive.
Since then (summary written by this site)
In December 2023, Andrew Kerr, Chief Executive of the City of Edinburgh Council, agreed that future governance structures for major projects must follow up to date guidance and clearly set out the roles and responsibilities of bodies and individuals (Andrew Kerr response, Dec 2023). He recommended that it adopt the recommendation and seek assurance that these roles are understood (Andrew Kerr response, Dec 2023). The record holds no update since the Council's response of December 2023 (Andrew Kerr response, Dec 2023).
Addressed to City of Edinburgh Council · Full record
Accepted · No statement from City of Edinburgh Council found
Recommended
At all stages of the project there should be a collaborative approach to delivering it. This should include the co-location of representatives from each organisation relevant to the particular stage reached and having an interest in its completion to enable any issues to be addressed and resolved at the earliest opportunity, thereby minimising the risk of the escalation of disputes with associated delays and increased expense.
Since then (summary written by this site)
In December 2023, Chief Executive Andrew Kerr recommended adopting the recommendation on collaborative delivery, reporting that the advantage of co-locating representatives with an interest in project completion was understood and had already been "successfully adopted on the Trams to Newhaven project" (Andrew Kerr response, Dec 2023). The record holds no update since the City of Edinburgh Council's response of December 2023 (Andrew Kerr response, Dec 2023).
Addressed to City of Edinburgh Council · Full record
Accepted · No statement from City of Edinburgh Council found
Recommended
The directors, employees and consultants of the company responsible for the procurement and delivery of the project as project managers, including an arm’s-length external organisation (“ALEO”) wholly owned by the local authority that is the promoter and owner of the project, should not submit to the local authority information that is deceptive or reports that are misleading either by the inclusion of false statements or by the omission of references to facts that might influence the strategic decisions of councillors if they were disclosed. In that regard they should recognise and respect the need for local authority officials to scrutinise and challenge the accuracy of information and reports submitted to them and should not seek to frustrate, or interfere with, the instruction of independent consultants to advise officials on the accuracy of the risk assessment in such reports or on the terms of any draft contracts for which they seek authority to sign.
Since then (summary written by this site)
The Inquiry recommended that external project bodies not submit misleading reports to councils. In December 2023, Andrew Kerr, Chief Executive of City of Edinburgh Council, stated that work was underway on a framework to strengthen scrutiny and formalise candour in governance agreements, alongside existing procurement rules against misleading tenders (Andrew Kerr response, Dec 2023). He noted that this review would report in 2024, but did not mention protecting the instruction of independent consultants (Andrew Kerr response, Dec 2023).
Addressed to City of Edinburgh Council · Full record
Accepted · No statement from City of Edinburgh Council found
Recommended
Local authority officials should be mindful at all times of the distinction in roles between them and councillors, who are solely responsible for strategic decisions, and of their duty to provide accurate reports to councillors to enable them to take informed decisions based upon the reality of the situation. Such reports should not be misleading either by the inclusion of false statements or by the omission of relevant facts. Where officials prepare and submit reports based upon reports to them from an ALEO acting as the procurement and delivery vehicle, they should not assume the accuracy of these reports based upon the adoption of a “one family” approach involving the local authority and the ALEO.
Since then (summary written by this site)
In December 2023, Andrew Kerr, Chief Executive of the City of Edinburgh Council, reported that the council accepted the recommendation, noting that training on the Member/Officer Protocol was being delivered to senior officers to reinforce the distinction between officer and councillor roles (Andrew Kerr response, Dec 2023). He stated that measures to ensure officers do not assume the accuracy of reports from arm's-length external organisations would be reviewed and strengthened under a framework reporting in 2024 (Andrew Kerr response, Dec 2023). The record holds no update since the council's response of December 2023 (Andrew Kerr response, Dec 2023).
Addressed to City of Edinburgh Council · Full record
Early Day MotionHouse of CommonsChristine Jardine · Liberal Democrat
Said: That this House congratulates Edinburgh Trams Drivers Emma White and Jason Moffat on their selection to represent Edinburgh Tram Driver Championship in Warsaw; recognises the skill, expertise and dedication required to compete in the championship which brings together tram drivers from across Europe and beyond; …
Early Day MotionHouse of CommonsMark Lazarowicz · Labour
Said: That this House welcomes the announcement by the Scottish Executive of funding of ú375 million for the proposed Edinburgh tram network; and urges elected representatives at all levels of government in Scotland to put their backing behind these proposals which will benefit the wider Scottish …
The Edinburgh Tram Inquiry, chaired by Lord Hardie, examined the planning and construction of Edinburgh's tram system, which experienced significant cost overruns and delays. The inquiry published 24 recommendations in August 2023 focusing on project governance, management practices, and legal reforms.
The Scottish Government accepted 14 recommendations (58%), accepted 7 in principle (29%), and placed 3 under consideration (12%). In its November 2023 response, the Government stated that enhanced procedures for documentation management had been embedded within government and that guidance for establishing inquiries was already in development. The Government noted its commitment to collaborative working through the Verity House agreement, whilst maintaining that responsibility for project delivery remains with councils.
City of Edinburgh Council's Chief Executive reported to the Transport and Environment Committee in November 2023, recommending acceptance of several recommendations. Council Leader Cammy Day acknowledged that "serious mistakes were made in the construction of the original tram line" and noted that processes implemented since the original project had helped deliver the successful Trams to Newhaven extension.
The Council reported that scrutiny of ALEOs had "significantly improved" following reviews in 2012 and 2016, resulting in formalised observer roles and increased committee scrutiny. Training on the Member/Officer Protocol was being delivered to senior officers to clarify the distinction between officer and councillor roles.
Three recommendations regarding civil damages provisions and criminal offences for misleading evidence to inquiries remain under consideration by the Scottish Government, which noted that existing remedies may already exist under delictual liability and fraud law.
Whilst both the Scottish Government and City of Edinburgh Council provided initial responses accepting most recommendations, published evidence of specific implementation actions remains limited for many recommendations, particularly those relating to project management expertise requirements, governance structures, and stakeholder co-location practices.
Reforms attributed to this inquiry · AI-generated- Enhanced procedures for minute-taking and documentation management embedded within Scottish Government and Civil Service (Scottish Government statement, November 2023) - Improved scrutiny arrangements for Arms Length External Organisations (ALEOs) by City of Edinburgh Council, including formalised observer roles and regular committee reporting following 2012 and 2016 reviews - Member/Officer Protocol training delivered to senior officers at City of Edinburgh Council to clarify distinction between officer and councillor roles - Guidance for efficient establishment of inquiries developed and shared with recent inquiries (Scottish Government statement, November 2023)Unfinished business · AI-generated- Recommendations on civil damages provisions and criminal statutory offences for misleading evidence to inquiries remain under consideration by Scottish Government - No published evidence of action on recommendations regarding project management expertise requirements for light rail projects - No published evidence of progress on recommendations for governance structure guidance and role clarity in major projects - No published evidence regarding recommendations on co-location of project stakeholders - No published evidence of updates to guidance on best practices for light rail delivery, despite Scottish Government stating it already operates in line with best practices