Public inquiry · Parliamentary scrutiny

Parliamentary activity

Undercover Policing Inquiry. Read indexed debates, questions, statements and early day motions, with links to the original parliamentary records.

38 indexed mentions for this inquiry Earliest recorded mention: 18 May 2016

Parliamentary mentions

38 matching mentions · newest first

Police: Inquiries

Written Question House of Lords
Baroness Hamwee · Liberal Democrat Answering body: Home Office
Parliamentary excerpt

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they are considering converting the undercover policing inquiry from a statutory inquiry to a non-statutory inquiry; and if so, what relevance they consider the Public Office (Accountability) Bill to have to that co

Original parliamentary record

Undercover Policing Inquiry

Written Question House of Lords
Baroness Hamwee · Liberal Democrat Answering body: Home Office
Parliamentary excerpt

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of whether the Public Office (Accountability) Bill will have an impact on the potential conversion of the Undercover Policing Inquiry from a statutory inquiry to a non-statutory inquiry.

Original parliamentary record

Undercover Policing Inquiry

Early Day Motion House of Commons
Nadia Whittome · Labour
Parliamentary excerpt

That this House expresses its grave concern at the mounting evidence emerging from the Undercover Policing Inquiry (UCPI) of extremely serious police misconduct and corruption on a scale far outstripping expectations at the Inquiry’s inception; welcomes the numerous apologies issued by the Metropolitan Police Service for misconduct which includes but is not limited to abusive sexual misconduct by officers, the theft of dead children's identities, and unjustifiable spying on campaign and commu...

Original parliamentary record

Undercover Policing Inquiry

Written Question House of Lords
Lord Spellar · Labour Answering body: Home Office
Parliamentary excerpt

To ask His Majesty's Government what has been the total cost to date of the Undercover Policing Inquiry; and how much has been paid to the Chair, Sir John Mitting.

Government answer

Answering body: Home Office

As of 30 June 2026, the Undercover Policing Inquiry had incurred a total expenditure of £144,597,900.

The Chair’s remuneration forms part of the £28,931,400 published under “Inquiry staffing, including secretariat”.

The Inquiry publishes a quarterly breakdown of its costs on its website: https://www.ucpi.org.uk/about-the-inquiry/#costs.

Original parliamentary record

Undercover Policing Inquiry

Written Question House of Commons
Neil Duncan-Jordan · Labour Answering body: Home Office
Parliamentary excerpt

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, whether the Undercover Policing Inquiry will be brought to an end before it has heard from all eligible participants.

Government answer

Answering body: Home Office

The Home Office established the Undercover Policing Inquiry in 2015 to inquire into and report on undercover police operations conducted by English and Welsh police forces in England and Wales since 1968. The Inquiry’s investigations continue and hearings for Tranche 3 are ongoing. This tranche covers the activities of the Special Demonstration Squad during the years 1967 to 2007. Further details on the progress of the Inquiry can be found at: https://www.ucpi.org.uk/.

On 16 July 2026, the Government launched a public consultation on the future of the Undercover Policing Inquiry. Responses can be submitted up to 23:59 on Sunday 20th September, and further information about the consultation can be found at: https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/future-of-the-undercover-policing-inquiry/consultation-on-the-future-of-the-undercover-policing-inquiry.

The purpose of the consultation is to gather views on the future of the Inquiry from those affected including core participants, stakeholders and the wider public. No decisions have been taken about the future of the Inquiry.

Original parliamentary record

Undercover Policing Inquiry

Written Question House of Commons
Neil Duncan-Jordan · Labour Answering body: Home Office
Parliamentary excerpt

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, if she will provide an update as to the current status of the Undercover Policing Inquiry.

Government answer

Answering body: Home Office

The Home Office established the Undercover Policing Inquiry in 2015 to inquire into and report on undercover police operations conducted by English and Welsh police forces in England and Wales since 1968. The Inquiry’s investigations continue and hearings for Tranche 3 are ongoing. This tranche covers the activities of the Special Demonstration Squad during the years 1967 to 2007. Further details on the progress of the Inquiry can be found at: https://www.ucpi.org.uk/.

On 16 July 2026, the Government launched a public consultation on the future of the Undercover Policing Inquiry. Responses can be submitted up to 23:59 on Sunday 20th September, and further information about the consultation can be found at: https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/future-of-the-undercover-policing-inquiry/consultation-on-the-future-of-the-undercover-policing-inquiry.

The purpose of the consultation is to gather views on the future of the Inquiry from those affected including core participants, stakeholders and the wider public. No decisions have been taken about the future of the Inquiry.

Original parliamentary record

Undercover Policing Inquiry

Written Question House of Commons
Mr Andrew Snowden · Conservative Answering body: Home Office
Parliamentary excerpt

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many members of staff are currently employed by the Undercover Policing Inquiry.

Government answer

Answering body: Home Office

i) The Undercover Policing Inquiry employs 36 civil servants. An additional 99 staff are contracted or sourced through a managed services contract to provide other services, such as legal support.

ii) The Inquiry’s first interim report was published in June 2023. This covered the Inquiry’s Tranche One investigations of the Special Demonstration Squad (SDS) between 1968 and 1982 and did not make any recommendations. The next interim report is due in Autumn 2027 and will not make any recommendations.

iii) The Government has considered whether there are any direct or indirect discrimination issues arising as a result of holding a consultation and has sought to ensure that the consultation is accessible to anyone who wishes to participate. In addition to responding through an online survey, individuals may submit responses by email. Following the conclusion of the consultation period, any decisions taken on the direction of the inquiry will aim to take account of an assessment of their impact on equality.

iv) The Inquiry’s full costs are published on its website, and these are updated periodically as further costs are incurred: Undercover Policing Inquiry – Costs. As of the end of March 2026, its total expenditure was £137,067,000. For each financial year from the establishment of the Inquiry, these costs are broken down as follows:

<tbody>

Financial year

Spend (£)

15/16

1,579,436

16/17

4,387,420

17/18

4,454,044

18/19

6,828,000

19/20

10,005,200

20/21

12,221,400

21/22

11,156,100

22/23

13,566,500

23/24

18,152,700

24/25

27,633,200

25/26

27,083,000

</tbody>

Original parliamentary record

Undercover Policing Inquiry

Written Question House of Commons
Mr Andrew Snowden · Conservative Answering body: Home Office
Parliamentary excerpt

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what estimate she has made of the annual operating cost of the Undercover Policing Inquiry in each financial year since its establishment.

Government answer

Answering body: Home Office

i) The Undercover Policing Inquiry employs 36 civil servants. An additional 99 staff are contracted or sourced through a managed services contract to provide other services, such as legal support.

ii) The Inquiry’s first interim report was published in June 2023. This covered the Inquiry’s Tranche One investigations of the Special Demonstration Squad (SDS) between 1968 and 1982 and did not make any recommendations. The next interim report is due in Autumn 2027 and will not make any recommendations.

iii) The Government has considered whether there are any direct or indirect discrimination issues arising as a result of holding a consultation and has sought to ensure that the consultation is accessible to anyone who wishes to participate. In addition to responding through an online survey, individuals may submit responses by email. Following the conclusion of the consultation period, any decisions taken on the direction of the inquiry will aim to take account of an assessment of their impact on equality.

iv) The Inquiry’s full costs are published on its website, and these are updated periodically as further costs are incurred: Undercover Policing Inquiry – Costs. As of the end of March 2026, its total expenditure was £137,067,000. For each financial year from the establishment of the Inquiry, these costs are broken down as follows:

<tbody>

Financial year

Spend (£)

15/16

1,579,436

16/17

4,387,420

17/18

4,454,044

18/19

6,828,000

19/20

10,005,200

20/21

12,221,400

21/22

11,156,100

22/23

13,566,500

23/24

18,152,700

24/25

27,633,200

25/26

27,083,000

</tbody>

Original parliamentary record

Undercover Policing Inquiry

Written Question House of Commons
Mr Andrew Snowden · Conservative Answering body: Home Office
Parliamentary excerpt

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, whether the Government has undertaken an equality impact assessment in relation to proposals concerning the future of the Undercover Policing Inquiry.

Government answer

Answering body: Home Office

i) The Undercover Policing Inquiry employs 36 civil servants. An additional 99 staff are contracted or sourced through a managed services contract to provide other services, such as legal support.

ii) The Inquiry’s first interim report was published in June 2023. This covered the Inquiry’s Tranche One investigations of the Special Demonstration Squad (SDS) between 1968 and 1982 and did not make any recommendations. The next interim report is due in Autumn 2027 and will not make any recommendations.

iii) The Government has considered whether there are any direct or indirect discrimination issues arising as a result of holding a consultation and has sought to ensure that the consultation is accessible to anyone who wishes to participate. In addition to responding through an online survey, individuals may submit responses by email. Following the conclusion of the consultation period, any decisions taken on the direction of the inquiry will aim to take account of an assessment of their impact on equality.

iv) The Inquiry’s full costs are published on its website, and these are updated periodically as further costs are incurred: Undercover Policing Inquiry – Costs. As of the end of March 2026, its total expenditure was £137,067,000. For each financial year from the establishment of the Inquiry, these costs are broken down as follows:

<tbody>

Financial year

Spend (£)

15/16

1,579,436

16/17

4,387,420

17/18

4,454,044

18/19

6,828,000

19/20

10,005,200

20/21

12,221,400

21/22

11,156,100

22/23

13,566,500

23/24

18,152,700

24/25

27,633,200

25/26

27,083,000

</tbody>

Original parliamentary record

Undercover Policing Inquiry

Written Question House of Commons
Mr Andrew Snowden · Conservative Answering body: Home Office
Parliamentary excerpt

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what progress has been made in implementing recommendations arising from the Undercover Policing Inquiry's interim reports.

Government answer

Answering body: Home Office

i) The Undercover Policing Inquiry employs 36 civil servants. An additional 99 staff are contracted or sourced through a managed services contract to provide other services, such as legal support.

ii) The Inquiry’s first interim report was published in June 2023. This covered the Inquiry’s Tranche One investigations of the Special Demonstration Squad (SDS) between 1968 and 1982 and did not make any recommendations. The next interim report is due in Autumn 2027 and will not make any recommendations.

iii) The Government has considered whether there are any direct or indirect discrimination issues arising as a result of holding a consultation and has sought to ensure that the consultation is accessible to anyone who wishes to participate. In addition to responding through an online survey, individuals may submit responses by email. Following the conclusion of the consultation period, any decisions taken on the direction of the inquiry will aim to take account of an assessment of their impact on equality.

iv) The Inquiry’s full costs are published on its website, and these are updated periodically as further costs are incurred: Undercover Policing Inquiry – Costs. As of the end of March 2026, its total expenditure was £137,067,000. For each financial year from the establishment of the Inquiry, these costs are broken down as follows:

<tbody>

Financial year

Spend (£)

15/16

1,579,436

16/17

4,387,420

17/18

4,454,044

18/19

6,828,000

19/20

10,005,200

20/21

12,221,400

21/22

11,156,100

22/23

13,566,500

23/24

18,152,700

24/25

27,633,200

25/26

27,083,000

</tbody>

Original parliamentary record

Consultation on the future of the Undercover Policing Inquiry

Written Ministerial Statement House of Lords
Lord Hanson of Flint · Labour Answering body: Home Office
Parliamentary excerpt

My rt hon Friend the Secretary of State for the Home Department (Shabana Mahmood) has today made the following Written Ministerial Statement:Today I am launching a consultation on the future of the Undercover Policing Inquiry (UCPI). This Government is committed to delivering justice and to ensuring that public inquiries are able to provide answers, accountability and recommendations within a reasonable timeframe. The UCPI was established in 2015 to examine undercover policing in England and ...

Recorded statement

Answering body: Home Office

My rt hon Friend the Secretary of State for the Home Department (Shabana Mahmood) has today made the following Written Ministerial Statement:

Today I am launching a consultation on the future of the Undercover Policing Inquiry (UCPI). This Government is committed to delivering justice and to ensuring that public inquiries are able to provide answers, accountability and recommendations within a reasonable timeframe.

The UCPI was established in 2015 to examine undercover policing in England and Wales since 1968. Sir John Mitting, the current Chair of the Inquiry, will retire in 2027. His retirement provides an opportunity to consult those affected, core participants and others with an interest in the Inquiry on how its remaining work should best be taken forward. I am grateful to him for his work on the Inquiry.

The Terms of Reference of the Inquiry are broad. In addition to examining the role of undercover policing in the prevention and detection of crime, the Inquiry is required to examine the motivation for and scope of undercover police operations, their effect on individuals and the public, the extent of government awareness of such operations, and the adequacy of the legal, policy and judicial framework governing undercover policing. The Inquiry is also tasked with reviewing the extent of the duty of disclosure in criminal proceedings involving undercover police operations and the scope for miscarriages of justice where disclosure was inadequate.

The Terms of Reference envisaged the Inquiry concluding within three years. It has made real progress in investigating the Metropolitan Police’s Special Demonstration Squad and produced an interim report on Tranche 1 of its work (relating to period 1968-82) and will publish an interim report concluding its work on the Special Demonstration Squad next year. More than a decade after it was established, the Inquiry remains ongoing. As at the end of March 2026, the Inquiry has spent £137m. Ministers remain concerned about the length and cost of the Inquiry and the delay in providing outcomes to those affected.

The consultation will seek views on the future structure, scope and format of the work needed to bring the remaining matters the Inquiry is set to investigate to a conclusion. It is not a re-opening of evidence, nor a call for new factual material about undercover policing or individual cases. Respondents will be invited to focus on how the Inquiry’s remaining areas of work should be prioritised and delivered.

Respondents to the consultation might wish to share their views on alternative ways the inquiry might discharge its remaining areas of work. They might wish to consider fairness to victims and those who were affected by undercover policing, bearing in mind transparency and public confidence, proportionality of cost and duration as well as the ability of different approaches to deliver meaningful recommendations. The consultation has been published on the gov.uk website and will close on Thursday 20th August 2026.

We plan to announce our decision on the future of the Inquiry, informed by this consultation in Autumn 2026.

Original parliamentary record

Consultation on the future of the Undercover Policing Inquiry

Written Ministerial Statement House of Commons
Shabana Mahmood · Labour Answering body: Home Office
Parliamentary excerpt

Today I am launching a consultation on the future of the Undercover Policing Inquiry (UCPI). This Government is committed to delivering justice and to ensuring that public inquiries are able to provide answers, accountability and recommendations within a reasonable timeframe. The UCPI was established in 2015 to examine undercover policing in England and Wales since 1968. Sir John Mitting, the current Chair of the Inquiry, will retire in 2027. His retirement provides an opportunity to consult ...

Recorded statement

Answering body: Home Office

Today I am launching a consultation on the future of the Undercover Policing Inquiry (UCPI). This Government is committed to delivering justice and to ensuring that public inquiries are able to provide answers, accountability and recommendations within a reasonable timeframe.

The UCPI was established in 2015 to examine undercover policing in England and Wales since 1968. Sir John Mitting, the current Chair of the Inquiry, will retire in 2027. His retirement provides an opportunity to consult those affected, core participants and others with an interest in the Inquiry on how its remaining work should best be taken forward. I am grateful to him for his work on the Inquiry.

The Terms of Reference of the Inquiry are broad. In addition to examining the role of undercover policing in the prevention and detection of crime, the Inquiry is required to examine the motivation for and scope of undercover police operations, their effect on individuals and the public, the extent of government awareness of such operations, and the adequacy of the legal, policy and judicial framework governing undercover policing. The Inquiry is also tasked with reviewing the extent of the duty of disclosure in criminal proceedings involving undercover police operations and the scope for miscarriages of justice where disclosure was inadequate.

The Terms of Reference envisaged the Inquiry concluding within three years. It has made real progress in investigating the Metropolitan Police’s Special Demonstration Squad and produced an interim report on Tranche 1 of its work (relating to period 1968-82) and will publish an interim report concluding its work on the Special Demonstration Squad next year. More than a decade after it was established, the Inquiry remains ongoing. As at the end of March 2026, the Inquiry has spent £137m. Ministers remain concerned about the length and cost of the Inquiry and the delay in providing outcomes to those affected.

The consultation will seek views on the future structure, scope and format of the work needed to bring the remaining matters the Inquiry is set to investigate to a conclusion. It is not a re-opening of evidence, nor a call for new factual material about undercover policing or individual cases. Respondents will be invited to focus on how the Inquiry’s remaining areas of work should be prioritised and delivered.

Respondents to the consultation might wish to share their views on alternative ways the inquiry might discharge its remaining areas of work. They might wish to consider fairness to victims and those who were affected by undercover policing, bearing in mind transparency and public confidence, proportionality of cost and duration as well as the ability of different approaches to deliver meaningful recommendations. The consultation has been published on the gov.uk website and will close on Thursday 20th August 2026.

We plan to announce our decision on the future of the Inquiry, informed by this consultation in Autumn 2026.

Original parliamentary record

Disclosure of Special Branch files

Early Day Motion House of Commons
John McDonnell · Independent
Parliamentary excerpt

That this House notes with concern that Special Branch documents show that the undercover police reported on union members speaking at meetings asking for solidarity with striking workers; further notes that in an internal police report known as Operation Reuben, the police admit that intelligence gathered by undercover policing was shared by both Special Branch and the security services, with employers and the notorious blacklisting organisations such as the Economic League and the Consulti...

Original parliamentary record

Undercover Policing Inquiry: Tranche 1 Interim Report

Written Ministerial Statement House of Lords
Lord Sharpe of Epsom · Conservative Answering body: Home Office
Parliamentary excerpt

My rt hon Friend the Secretary of State for the Home Department (Suella Braverman) has today made the following Written Ministerial Statement:Today the Undercover Policing Inquiry has published its first report. The Inquiry was established in 2015 to inqu...

Recorded statement

Answering body: Home Office

My rt hon Friend the Secretary of State for the Home Department (Suella Braverman) has today made the following Written Ministerial Statement:Today the Undercover Policing Inquiry has published its first report. The Inquiry was established in 2015 to inqu...

Original parliamentary record

Undercover Policing Inquiry: Tranche 1 Interim Report

Written Ministerial Statement House of Commons
Suella Braverman · Conservative Answering body: Home Office
Parliamentary excerpt

Today the Undercover Policing Inquiry has published its first report. The Inquiry was established in 2015 to inquire into, and report on, undercover police operations conducted by English and Welsh police forces in England and Wales since 1968. The Inquir...

Recorded statement

Answering body: Home Office

Today the Undercover Policing Inquiry has published its first report. The Inquiry was established in 2015 to inquire into, and report on, undercover police operations conducted by English and Welsh police forces in England and Wales since 1968. The Inquir...

Original parliamentary record

Police: Surveillance

Written Question House of Lords
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb · Green Party Answering body: Home Office
Parliamentary excerpt

To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they will take to ensure that the list of 1,192 affiliated and organisational groups mentioned in Special Demonstration Squad documentation, which was collated by the Metropolitan Police Service Inquiry and Revie

Government answer

Answering body: Home Office

The Inquiry is independent of the Home Office, and its independence is crucial to its effectiveness. It would not, therefore, be appropriate for the Government to comment on or intervene in the Inquiry’s decision-making.The Inquiry is responsible for deci...

Original parliamentary record

Peers: Surveillance

Written Question House of Lords
Lord Balfe · Conservative Answering body: Home Office
Parliamentary excerpt

To ask Her Majesty's Government what arrangements they intend to make for members of the House of Lords named as having MI5 files in the course of the Undercover Policing Inquiry to see those files.

Government answer

Answering body: Home Office

The Undercover Policing Inquiry is independent of the Home Office, and its independence is crucial to its effectiveness.Disclosure is a matter for the Inquiry. Safeguarding the independence of the Inquiry is of paramount importance and it would not genera...

Original parliamentary record

Undercover Policing Inquiry

Written Question House of Commons
Richard Burgon · Labour Answering body: Home Office
Parliamentary excerpt

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment she has made of the potential merits of appointing panel members with expertise in (a) institutional racism, (b) sexism, (C) class bias and (d) the other relevant issues in the Underco

Government answer

Answering body: Home Office

The issue was carefully considered in 2018 and it was decided that panel members would not be appointed at that time. A judicial review of the decision was subsequently refused. Sir John Mitting is an experienced High Court Judge and has the necessary exp...

Original parliamentary record

Undercover Policing Inquiry

Written Question House of Commons
Richard Burgon · Labour Answering body: Home Office
Parliamentary excerpt

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment she has made of the potential effect of not funding the legal costs for participants in the Undercover Policing Inquiry.

Government answer

Answering body: Home Office

The Undercover Policing Inquiry is independent of the Home Office and decisions regarding funding for Core Participants are for the Inquiry to make.Under section 40 of the Inquiries Act 2005, the Inquiry Chair has the power to award reasonable amounts to ...

Original parliamentary record

Undercover Policing Inquiry

Written Question House of Commons
Richard Burgon · Labour Answering body: Home Office
Parliamentary excerpt

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment she has made of the potential effect of not providing live audio and video streaming of the Undercover Policing Inquiry on the ability of the (a) public and (b) core participants to e

Government answer

Answering body: Home Office

The Undercover Policing Inquiry is independent of the Home Office and so, decisions on the conduct of its investigations and hearings are for the Inquiry to make.The Inquiry has sought the views of Core Participants and relevant parties on how it should c...

Original parliamentary record

Undercover Policing Inquiry

Written Question House of Commons
Richard Burgon · Labour Answering body: Home Office
Parliamentary excerpt

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment she has made of the potential merits of instructing the police and security services to make available to their unredacted registry files to the Undercover Policing Inquiry.

Government answer

Answering body: Home Office

The police and Security Service are operationally independent from the Home Office and decisions concerning their engagement with the Undercover Policing Inquiry are a matter for them. It would not be appropriate for the Home Office to comment on or inter...

Original parliamentary record

Undercover Policing Inquiry

Early Day Motion House of Commons
Richard Burgon · Labour
Parliamentary excerpt

That this House notes the ongoing independent public Undercover Policing Inquiry, set up to investigate undercover policing in England and Wales since 1968; recognises the concerns raised by Non State Non Police Core Participants (NSNPCPs) and interested campaign groups (including the Campaign Opposing Police Surveillance and Police Spies Out of Lives) that the inquiry is not currently properly accessible to Core Participants or to the public; supports the principle of open justice including ...

Original parliamentary record

Police

Written Question House of Lords
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb · Green Party Answering body: Home Office
Parliamentary excerpt

To ask Her Majesty's Government how many (1) political, and (2) campaigning, organisations have been (a) monitored, and (b) infiltrated, by police, or at the direction of police, since 1991.

Government answer

Answering body: Home Office

Part 2 of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act provides the police with the power to authorise surveillance and covert human intelligence sources where it is necessary for one of the statutory purposes (i.e. the prevention and detection of crime) an...

Original parliamentary record

Police

Written Question House of Lords
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb · Green Party Answering body: Home Office
Parliamentary excerpt

To ask Her Majesty's Government which (1) political, and (2) campaigning, organisations have been (a) monitored, and (b) infiltrated, by police, or at the direction of police, since 1991.

Government answer

Answering body: Home Office

Part 2 of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act provides the police with the power to authorise surveillance and covert human intelligence sources where it is necessary for one of the statutory purposes (i.e. the prevention and detection of crime) an...

Original parliamentary record