Source · Select Committees · Education Committee

First Report - Ofsted’s work with schools

Education Committee HC 117 Published 29 January 2024
Report Status
Government responded
Conclusions & Recommendations
49 items (8 recs)
Government Response
AI assessment · 49 of 49 classified
Accepted 12
Accepted in Part 6
Acknowledged 4
Deferred 25
Rejected 2
Filter by: Clear

Recommendations

1 result
17 Rejected
Para 61

Commission independent assessment of factors affecting retention of experienced Ofsted HMIs.

Recommendation
We recognise the value and expertise that experienced inspectors can bring, particularly long-serving HMIs. Ofsted should commission an independent assessment of the factors affecting retention of experienced HMIs and take appropriate steps to address the issue. Read more
Government Response Summary
The government rejects the recommendation to commission an independent assessment, stating it already understands HMI retention factors and does not believe it would be a good use of public money, citing salary constraints and workload as known issues.
Department for Education
View Details →

Conclusions (1)

Observations and findings
6 Conclusion Rejected
Para 27
In the shorter term, the Department should work with Ofsted to enable the inspectorate to reduce the frequency of inspections to approximately five to six years for ‘good’ and ‘outstanding’ schools and three to four years for schools judged ‘requires improvement’ or ‘inadequate’. This should be supported by better use …
Government Response Summary
The government states that inspection frequency is set by legislation, arguing that the current 5-year interval provides reassurance to parents and that less frequent inspections could reduce standards. While the "Big Listen" will explore these issues, they do not commit to the recommended reduction in inspection frequency.
View Details →