Select committee: Defence Committee
Conclusion 4
3rd report - The Global Combat Air Programme
Published 14 Jan 2025
Addressed to Ministry of Defence
Defence Committee Future Aviation Capabilities All items in this report Report on parliament.uk ↗ Inquiry on parliament.uk ↗
Conclusion (the committee's words)
Given the ambitious timescales for GCAP, its delivery structures at the Governmental and industrial levels will need to be sufficiently empowered to take timely and binding decisions as the programme progresses. A repeat of the structural failings which contributed to unnecessary delay and cost on the Eurofighter Typhoon would place the programme in jeopardy. We are encouraged that this imperative has been recognised by both the MOD and industry. It was clear from our visit to Italy that they, having also 29 experienced the delays that had been caused on Typhoon, had drawn the same conclusions—and meeting the 2035 target date is critical for Japan. This early commitment to empowering GCAP’s delivery organisations must be sustained throughout the programme’s development if it is to succeed. (Conclusion, Paragraph 29)
From: Defence Committee, 3rd report - The Global Combat Air Programme (HC 598), 14 January 2025
Government response
The government responded to the whole report on 21 March 2025 (deadline 14 March 2025).
Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.The government welcomes the Committee's assessment of GCAP's importance, agrees with several recommendations, and does not give a specific response on the Hawk conclusion beyond saying alternative options are being assessed.
- On partners, it says the UK, Japan and Italy "are open to further partners", but that this "must similarly be driven by the needs of the programme and its agreed timeline".
- On delivery structures, it agrees that "an empowered joint delivery organisation will be essential", citing the 2024 treaty ratified by all three partners to set up the GCAP International Government Organisation.
- On costs and transparency, it says it "is committed to transparency to support proper scrutiny" and is "actively pursuing means to manage costs". The response does not commit to the multi-year funding arrangement the Committee asked it to consider.
- On Hawk, it says recent events led to an investigation, that "further investment will be required" for Hawk T2 to reach its 2040 out of service date, and that alternative options "are being assessed".