Select committee: Defence Committee

Recommendation 3

3rd report - The Global Combat Air Programme Published 14 Jan 2025 Addressed to Ministry of Defence
Recommendation (the committee's words)
An open-minded but cautious approach should be taken to including new international partners within GCAP. The potential benefits will need to be weighed carefully against the risks, with any proposed partnering opportunity carefully assessed on its own merits. Any additional partnering arrangements that could jeopardise the 2035 in-service date should not be contemplated. (Recommendation, Paragraph 21)

From: Defence Committee, 3rd report - The Global Combat Air Programme (HC 598), 14 January 2025

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 21 March 2025 (deadline 14 March 2025).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government welcomes the Committee's assessment of GCAP's importance, agrees with several recommendations, and does not give a specific response on the Hawk conclusion beyond saying alternative options are being assessed.

  • On partners, it says the UK, Japan and Italy "are open to further partners", but that this "must similarly be driven by the needs of the programme and its agreed timeline".
  • On delivery structures, it agrees that "an empowered joint delivery organisation will be essential", citing the 2024 treaty ratified by all three partners to set up the GCAP International Government Organisation.
  • On costs and transparency, it says it "is committed to transparency to support proper scrutiny" and is "actively pursuing means to manage costs". The response does not commit to the multi-year funding arrangement the Committee asked it to consider.
  • On Hawk, it says recent events led to an investigation, that "further investment will be required" for Hawk T2 to reach its 2040 out of service date, and that alternative options "are being assessed".

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error