Source · Select Committees · Defence Committee
Recommendation 13
13
Paragraph: 54
We note that difficulties with the Ajax programme have again arisen in part as a...
Conclusion
We note that difficulties with the Ajax programme have again arisen in part as a consequence of the Army’s desire to develop a bespoke vehicle capability (albeit one based on an existing but modified ASCOD 2 hull), with a plethora of complex requirements, and the need to integrate a novel weapon system technology. We welcome the assurances from General Dynamics Land Systems UK that the challenges facing the Ajax programme have been largely resolved and look forward to these new advanced vehicles being delivered to frontline units as soon as possible. The Ministry of Defence must ensure that there are no further delays to this expensive programme. We also note that there may be potential synergies between Ajax and a revised requirement for an armoured infantry fighting vehicle. The Ministry of Defence must ensure that there are no further delays to this expensive programme. We also note that there may be potential synergies between Ajax and a revised requirement for an armoured infantry fighting vehicle. In the event that the Warrior Capability Sustainment Programme does not proceed the Army should explain how that Infantry Fighting Vehicle role would be fulfilled and if a further AJAX variant may be a potential candidate, with the associated benefits of in-service support.
Paragraph Reference:
54
Government Response
Acknowledged
HM Government
Acknowledged
originally envisaged as the first next generation modern, digital AFV. As in any complex acquisition there are several risks and challenges that materialise in the demonstration and pre-production phases which the MOD looks to manage and mitigate against thorough analysis and by learning from previous programmes and experiences. It should be noted that these delays are not always technical in nature; some are programmatic as spending is adjusted to reflect contract performance, the Department’s annual planning round and affordability challenges. However, issues are now being addressed and this learning is driving an improved approach into other programmes. As indicated in the response to paragraph 10, the Department is embarking on a new transformational approach where operational versatility will deliver political and strategic choice between ‘operate’ and ‘fight’. The focus will remain on two modernised Heavy Brigade Combat Teams with the necessary supporting elements. There are no current plans to develop an Infantry Fighting Vehicle variant of AJAX.