Source · Select Committees · Defence Committee
Recommendation 5
5
Paragraph: 27
We are astonished that between 1997 and late 2020 (with the exception of a small...
Recommendation
We are astonished that between 1997 and late 2020 (with the exception of a small number of armoured engineering and Viking protected mobility vehicles) the Department had not delivered a single new armoured vehicle from the core procurement programme into operational service with the Army. It is clear that the Ministry of Defence’s armoured vehicle programmes requires independent scrutiny. We ask the National Audit Office to revisit this issue to establish the costs incurred since its 2011 report, progress in delivering current programmes, current armoured capability gaps and the coherency and delivery realism of the Army’s current portfolio of armoured vehicle programmes, particularly in the context of the forthcoming Integrated Review.
Paragraph Reference:
27
Government Response
A response document is linked to this report, dated 21 May 2021. Response attribution to this conclusion has not been verified. Read the response document ↗