Select committee: Defence Committee

Conclusion 7

Sixth Report - Special Relationships? US, UK and NATO Published 7 Mar 2023 Paragraph 37 Addressed to Ministry of Defence
Conclusion (the committee's words)
The US have engaged widely with allies and partners on Ukraine. Although this did not deter President Putin from his course of action, it helped to build a unified response. The US is to be commended for its approach in declassifying intelligence and combatting Russian narratives. UK Defence Intelligence have also kept the public informed about the situation on the ground in Ukraine. Their clear and sustained analysis is partly responsible for continuing public support for Ukraine.

From: Defence Committee, Sixth Report - Special Relationships? US, UK and NATO (HC 184), paragraph 37, 7 March 2023

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 22 June 2023 (deadline 7 May 2023).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government's response welcomes the Committee's recognition of the UK-US relationship, and states that it "agrees" on several points, including the value of that relationship, closer allied engagement and the importance of effective deterrence.

  • On the US relationship, the Department "agrees that the UK derives great value from the US relationship", and "agrees on the need for even closer engagement and alignment between close allies".
  • On US regulatory barriers, it says they are a "significant barrier", and that "work is underway" with the US Administration and Congress "to make some headway in pursuing reforms or exemptions for the UK and Australia".
  • On munitions and industrial capacity, it states it will update the Committee on plans for industrial capacity and munitions stockpiles "in due course". It does not state that it will produce the action plan the Committee recommended.
  • On the EU, it supports NATO-EU cooperation but states: "we will not support any measures that undermine our sovereignty over our own armed forces", or that lead to competition or duplication with NATO.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error