Select committee: Defence Committee
Conclusion 6
Sixth Report - Special Relationships? US, UK and NATO
Published 7 Mar 2023
Paragraph 32
Addressed to Ministry of Defence
Defence Committee US, UK and NATO All items in this report Report on parliament.uk ↗ Inquiry on parliament.uk ↗
Conclusion (the committee's words)
The outcome of the Doha Agreement was the return of the Taliban to power in a country where the UK lost 457 service personnel and the MOD assessed that it had spent £27.7 billion on Operations Herrick and TORAL. We examine the decisions made in relation to the Doha Agreement more fully in our Report on Afghanistan. However, it is clear that the signing of the Doha Agreement served domestic US Administration priorities of the time. The absence of other NATO Allies and the Afghan Government at the Doha negotiations meant that decisions taken did not necessarily reflect the interests of all involved.
From: Defence Committee, Sixth Report - Special Relationships? US, UK and NATO (HC 184), paragraph 32, 7 March 2023
Government response
The government responded to the whole report on 22 June 2023 (deadline 7 May 2023).
Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.The government's response welcomes the Committee's recognition of the UK-US relationship, and states that it "agrees" on several points, including the value of that relationship, closer allied engagement and the importance of effective deterrence.
- On the US relationship, the Department "agrees that the UK derives great value from the US relationship", and "agrees on the need for even closer engagement and alignment between close allies".
- On US regulatory barriers, it says they are a "significant barrier", and that "work is underway" with the US Administration and Congress "to make some headway in pursuing reforms or exemptions for the UK and Australia".
- On munitions and industrial capacity, it states it will update the Committee on plans for industrial capacity and munitions stockpiles "in due course". It does not state that it will produce the action plan the Committee recommended.
- On the EU, it supports NATO-EU cooperation but states: "we will not support any measures that undermine our sovereignty over our own armed forces", or that lead to competition or duplication with NATO.