Select committee: Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Committee

Conclusion 1

Sixth Report - Mineworkers’ Pension Scheme Published 29 Apr 2021 Paragraph 16 Addressed to Department for Business and Trade
Conclusion (the committee's words)
The Scheme’s Trustees had little choice but to accept the Government’s proposal to divide future surpluses on a 50:50 basis, as a condition of securing the Government’s guarantee during the negotiations in 1994.

From: Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Committee, Sixth Report - Mineworkers’ Pension Scheme (HC 1346), paragraph 16, 29 April 2021

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 5 July 2021 (deadline 29 June 2021).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The Government states it is "unable to agree to the Committee's recommendations" and continues to believe the 1994 arrangement "was fair and beneficial to both Scheme members and taxpayers".

  • It does not accept that it has benefitted unduly, saying the arrangements "have been a success and benefitted all parties".
  • It does not accept that the Trustees had no choice in 1994, noting they "could have declined the offer of the guarantee at that time".
  • On changing the terms, it says BEIS Ministers "would be happy to have that discussion" if the Trustees want to leave the guarantee arrangements, but notes the Trustees have indicated the guarantee is worth more than the share of surpluses.
  • It is "happy to consider ways to improve benefits", but says this "has to be weighed against the risks to taxpayers". It states that receipts go to the Exchequer and were never intended to be ringfenced for members or coalfield communities.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error