Source · Select Committees · Public Accounts Committee

Thirty-Third Report - Underpayments of the State Pension

Public Accounts Committee HC 654 Published 21 January 2022
Report Status
Government responded
Conclusions & Recommendations
22 items (6 recs)
Government Response
AI assessment · 21 of 22 classified
Accepted 7
Acknowledged 8
Not Addressed 4
Rejected 2
Government response
Treasury minutes: Government response to the Committee of Public Accounts on the Thirty Third report from Session 2021-22 · published 28 Apr 2022
Read the government response ↗ Response on the Index
Filter by: Clear

Recommendations & Conclusions

2 items
20 Conclusion Rejected

Managing Public Money (A4.14) states that ‘when public sector organisations have caused injustice or hardship...

Conclusion
Managing Public Money (A4.14) states that ‘when public sector organisations have caused injustice or hardship because of maladministration or service failure, they should consider providing remedies so that, as far as reasonably possible, they restore the wronged party to the … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government disagrees with the Committee’s recommendation and does not intend to change the current legislative position, asserting it is a long-standing principle of personal responsibility for social care in England.
HM Treasury
View Details →
21 Recommendation Rejected

Some of those who contacted the Department prior to the LEAP exercise starting in January...

Recommendation
Some of those who contacted the Department prior to the LEAP exercise starting in January 2021 received special payments of interest on top of their underpayment.54 The Department chose to stop paying interest on arrears, citing value-for-money considerations and comparability … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government disagrees with the recommendation to establish the full extent of the impact on pensioners of receiving a lump sum of arrears of benefit, particularly for larger sums of arrears, and to seek assurance from local authorities that people are not treated prejudicially compared to how they would have been treated had they received the money over their proper period of entitlement, citing existing regulations and the principle of personal responsibility for social care.
HM Treasury
View Details →