Source · Select Committees · Public Accounts Committee
Thirty-Third Report - Underpayments of the State Pension
Public Accounts Committee
HC 654
Published 21 January 2022
Recommendations
6
In paying pensioners, a lump sum of their arrears, the Department may not be fully...
Recommendation
In paying pensioners, a lump sum of their arrears, the Department may not be fully restoring them to the position that they would be in had the Department paid them correctly in the first place. The payment of a lump …
Read more
HM Treasury
View Details →
Conclusions (21)
2
Conclusion
The Department’s complacency about the level of underpayments inherent in its approach to administering State Pension has led it to fail pensioners. The Department’s highly manual systems and complex State Pension rules has led to calculation errors and the underpayment of thousands of pensioners. The Department, however, argued that low …
3
Conclusion
The Department has not given people who are worried they have been underpaid enough information to find out what they should do, with the risk that many may still miss out on money they should receive. The Department’s communications strategy is to only contact those who it finds have been …
4
Conclusion
Correcting the State Pension underpayments comes at a great cost to the taxpayer and requires experienced specialist staff that are in short supply. The correction exercise requires specialist staff and training and is expected to cost the Department £23.4 million, with over 500 staff recruited, by the time the exercise …
5
Conclusion
The Department has not been sufficiently transparent to Parliament about the State Pension underpayments. Until recently, the Department has been reluctant to provide details of the volume or value of State Pension underpayments or the backlog in processing new State Pension applications to the general public or Parliament. We note …
7
Conclusion
Given the nature of the underpayments identified there must be a risk that similar, unidentified errors exist elsewhere in the State Pension caseload. For example, the NAO report states that “the Department did not find any significant evidence that it had failed to properly process cases where a pensioner had …
1
Conclusion
On the basis of a report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, we took evidence from the Department for Work & Pensions on the issue of underpayments in State Pension1
8
Conclusion
In addition, the customer information contained in the legacy system is difficult to obtain, taking several weeks to scan, and demographic data—such as income distribution or ethnic background—are not available.15 The Department told us that, while it was not 7 Q 30 8 C&AG’s Report, para 2.3 9 Qq 39, …
9
Conclusion
We challenged the Department on the adequacy of its quality assurance mechanisms.18 Despite the complexity of State Pension entitlements and the increased risk posed by manual processes of calculating an award, the Department’s own internal analysis found that existing quality checks failed to identify the systematic underpayment of thousands of …
10
Conclusion
The Department told us it changed its quality assurance framework over the LEAP exercise and business-as-usual State Pension processing.21 Following our evidence session the Department explained that, as part of its quality strategy review it reviewed its training products, amended the instructions used by front-line staff to ensure they are …
11
Conclusion
When we asked the Department what positive assurance it obtained that the system was working and that it was paying people on time and the right amount, it set out the three quality assurance tiers and that said that its focus was on areas with higher error rates. The Department …
12
Conclusion
A Legal Entitlements and Administrative Practices (LEAP) exercise is a systematic review of cases at risk of being underpaid to help the Department ensure it has met its legal responsibilities. The Department for Work & Pensions (the Department) uses LEAP exercises to make key decisions in situations where a mistake …
13
Conclusion
The Department began a LEAP exercise for State Pension underpayments in January 2021, which was originally expected to take more than six years to complete. Following a ministerial decision in March 2021 to recruit additional staff, the Department revised the completion date to the end of 2023.27 Cost to taxpayer
14
Conclusion
The Department currently has just over 200 people conducting the LEAP exercise. The State Pension correction exercise requires specialist staff and training and is expected to cost the Department £23.4 million, with over 500 staff employed, by the time the exercise completes. The Department redeployed its more experienced caseworkers from …
15
Conclusion
We asked the Department about the findings of the NAO financial audit of the Department’s 2020–21 accounts, which identified nearly 200 of 1,500 cases where the LEAP reviewers had incorrectly assessed arrears on married women’s entitlement.31 The NAO concluded that, given the complexity of the rules governing State Pension entitlement, …
16
Conclusion
The Department decided to contact pensioners reviewed as part of the State Pension LEAP exercise only if a correction was made to their basic State Pension.36 Other groups of pensioners can receive arrears if they make a claim to the Department, however, the Department has provided very little information to …
17
Conclusion
When we asked if the Department is able to provide greater clarity to those who think they may have been affected, the Department said that it cannot publish guidance for those who may have been underpaid, such as an online questionnaire, because it believes it cannot accurately cover all possible …
18
Conclusion
Until recently, the Department did not keep records on pensioners for more than four years after the date they died due to its data retention policy.40 However, it said it has now 32 C&AG’s Report, paras 18, 4.11 33 Qq 79, 80 34 Qq 1, 83; Letter from Permanent Secretary …
19
Conclusion
The Department told us that it began exploring the potential for underpayments from April 2020, following a number of complaints by individual pensioners and a campaign by the former pensions minister Sir Steve Webb and Tanya Jefferies of Thisismoney.co.uk from January 2020, who provided the Department with example cases of …
20
Conclusion
Managing Public Money (A4.14) states that ‘when public sector organisations have caused injustice or hardship because of maladministration or service failure, they should consider providing remedies so that, as far as reasonably possible, they restore the wronged party to the position that they would be in had things been done …
21
Conclusion
Some of those who contacted the Department prior to the LEAP exercise starting in January 2021 received special payments of interest on top of their underpayment.54 The Department chose to stop paying interest on arrears, citing value-for-money considerations and comparability of treatment in other LEAP exercises.55 When we challenged the …
22
Conclusion
Since our evidence session Sir Steve Webb has also drawn our attention to a potential systemic error affecting divorced pensioners. The NAO report states that “the Department did not find any significant evidence that it had failed to properly process cases where a pensioner had notified it of their divorce”.58 …