Source · Select Committees · Public Accounts Committee

57th Report - Government services: Generating income

Public Accounts Committee HC 890 Published 10 December 2025
Report Status
Government responded
Conclusions & Recommendations
25 items (16 recs)
Government Response
AI assessment · 25 of 25 classified
Accepted 9
Accepted in Part 5
Acknowledged 5
Not Addressed 1
Rejected 5
Filter by: Clear

Conclusions (5)

Observations and findings
10 Conclusion Acknowledged
Over the five-year period from 2019-20 to 2023-24, none of the seven government services reviewed consistently met their cost-recovery targets. Poor cost-recovery persisting over time results in a build-up of surplus and deficits in some services. Both passports and family court fees have repeatedly missed their cost-recovery targets by more …
Government Response Summary
The Treasury acknowledged the challenge of potential inequities for users when government bodies under or overcharge for services and hopes to address this through stronger incentives for departments to encourage lower costs through efficiencies.
View Details →
11 Conclusion Acknowledged
Significant imbalances between fees and costs pose risks to the financial resilience of public services and create unfairness for the public. The NAO reported that the passport service has been underrecovering since 2017-18 without explicit approval from Home Office Ministers or HM Treasury. This has led to a deficit of …
Government Response Summary
The Treasury acknowledged the challenge of potential inequities for users when government bodies under or overcharge for services and hopes to address this through stronger incentives for departments to encourage lower costs through efficiencies.
View Details →
12 Conclusion Acknowledged
The NAO report highlighted that persistent imbalances can also create potential inequities for users. When government bodies undercharge for services, cumulative losses are often recouped through higher fees for future users. Conversely, when services over-recover, current users end up overpaying.22 We were interested to hear how the Treasury make sure …
Government Response Summary
The Treasury acknowledged the challenge of potential inequities for users when government bodies under or overcharge for services and hopes to address this through stronger incentives for departments to encourage lower costs through efficiencies.
View Details →
20 Conclusion Acknowledged
The NAO reported the charged services it examined did not fully fulfil their disclosure requirements on areas such as unit costs, the cost-recovery targets, objectives, the extent and explanation for over or under-recovery.39 The lack of transparency affects public confidence and understanding of what they are paying for. The Treasury …
Government Response Summary
The Treasury will update the Financial Reporting Manual (FReM) to align to 6.11 of Managing Public Money (MPM) by Spring 2026 to include clearer reporting guidance for fee-charging public bodies to ensure more effective Parliamentary scrutiny and will continue to keep this under review including considering as part of a wider review of Central Government financial reporting.
View Details →
21 Conclusion Acknowledged
The NAO report highlighted the importance of proportionate financial reporting requirements, particularly for smaller bodies.43 We asked how the Treasury will make sure its disclosure requirements are proportionate. The Treasury told us that it is mindful of the administrative burden, and it intends to do more to help departments improve …
Government Response Summary
The Treasury will update the Financial Reporting Manual (FReM) to align to 6.11 of Managing Public Money (MPM) by Spring 2026 to include clearer reporting guidance for fee-charging public bodies to ensure more effective Parliamentary scrutiny and will continue to keep this under review including considering as part of a wider review of Central Government financial reporting.
View Details →