Select committee: Public Accounts Committee

Recommendation 6

65th Report - Efficiency and resilience of the Probation Service Published 4 Feb 2026 Addressed to HM Treasury
Recommendation (the committee's words)
Sufficient third sector and private sector capacity is required to meet offender needs, but decisions around funding are still unclear. HMPPS’s planned changes to the scope of the Probation Service will likely reduce probation supervision for many offenders assessed to be at lower risk of harm and reoffending. As highlighted to us by the Prison Reform Trust, low-risk individuals often require support for mental health, financial and drug treatment to prevent them becoming high-risk and reoffending. HMPPS’s plans will therefore require increased community support from Commissioned Rehabilitative Services (CRS) and other third sector organisations. The government has committed to providing an additional £700 million funding for the Probation Service over the next five years, but MoJ and HMPPS have not clarified how much of this funding will be available to cover additional demand for rehabilitative services. HMPPS’s plans also involve a significant increase in the use of electronic monitoring. Currently around 26,600 people are electronically monitored in the community but MoJ expects this to increase by up to 22,000 people. However, there have been serious performance issues with the electronic monitoring service, including delays by Serco in fitting tags. 6 recommendation MoJ and HMPPS should write to the Committee within six months setting out how Serco is performing against its key performance indicators, with regard to the electronic monitoring service and fitting tags. recommendation Once MoJ and HMPPS have clarified the role that they intend third sector and private sector organisations to play in the future Probation Service they should write to the Committee setting out: a. estimates of the proportion of individuals who will need access to this support and how that will be funded; b. what assurance they have that those no longer supervised by the Probation Service will be sufficiently supported to reduce reoffending, including providing details about the asse

From: Public Accounts Committee, 65th Report - Efficiency and resilience of the Probation Service (HC 1235), 4 February 2026

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 7 April 2026 (deadline 4 April 2026).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government states that it "agrees with the Committee's recommendation" on each of the Committee's recommendations, and sets out timelines, a revised performance framework and reporting commitments.

  • On performance, the government "expects the Probation Service to demonstrate measurable and sustained improvements" over the spending review period to March 2029, with a revised performance framework centred on "a smaller number of priority metrics" to be introduced in April 2026.
  • On reoffending, it says it is "very challenging to attribute changes in the reoffending measure to individual initiatives", and that evaluation of 'Reset' "will be published by July 2026".
  • On workloads, the Our Future Probation Service programme was launched with the "primary objective to reduce workloads by 25% by April 2027", and HMPPS plans to share more detail with staff during March and April 2026.
  • It commits to write to the Committee on Serco's performance against its key performance indicators within six months of the report (target August 2026), and on third and private sector support and electronic monitoring capacity (target October 2026).

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error