Recommendations & Conclusions
9 items
2
Recommendation
Forty-Ninth Report - COVID-19: housing …
Rejected
The Department still does not have a plan for achieving its target of ending rough sleeping by 2024, and risks failing to capitalise on the successes of Everyone In. Following the general election in December 2019 the government began this Parliament with a manifesto commitment to end rough sleeping by …
Read more
The Department still does not have a plan for achieving its target of ending rough sleeping by 2024, and risks failing to capitalise on the successes of Everyone In. Following the general election in December 2019 the government began this Parliament with a manifesto commitment to end rough sleeping by May 2024: only three years from now. This brought forward the government’s previous commitment, which had been to end rough sleeping by May 2027. In February 2020 the Department commissioned a review of its 2018 rough sleeping strategy towards meeting its new target but, owing to the prioritisation given to dealing with the pandemic, this has not yet been conducted. Not only does the Department not have a plan for ending rough sleeping by 2024, it also has not worked out how to define what ‘ending’ rough sleeping means or how it will measure and report on progress in a meaningful way. To end rough sleeping will certainly involve addressing the wider lack of availability of supported housing and affordable housing. The Department’s evidence shows that 80% of rough sleepers have mental health needs and a significant majority have substance abuse which underlines the importance of providing appropriate wraparound care to provide a sustainable pathway out of rough-sleeping. In 2017 this Committee recommended that the Department launch a cross-government strategy for addressing homelessness in the round, which could have helped it to address this issue, but it has so far failed to do so. Recommendation: The Department must, before summer recess, publish at least a draft strategy for how it will achieve its goal of ending rough sleeping by 2024. This should set out its definition of ‘ending’ rough sleeping, how it will measure and report progress in achieving and maintaining this goal, and the capacity of supported and affordable housing required to reduce the flow of people onto the streets towards zero for the long term.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government explicitly rejects the recommendation to publish a draft strategy for ending rough sleeping by summer recess, citing the need for sufficient time for development and alignment with the forthcoming 2021 Spending Review.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
3
Recommendation
Forty-Ninth Report - COVID-19: housing …
Rejected
The size of the rough sleeping population and those at risk of rough sleeping is far higher than the snapshot the Department is relying on, exposing the inadequacy of its current approach to data collection and reporting. One consequence of 6 COVID-19: housing people sleeping rough Everyone In has been …
Read more
The size of the rough sleeping population and those at risk of rough sleeping is far higher than the snapshot the Department is relying on, exposing the inadequacy of its current approach to data collection and reporting. One consequence of 6 COVID-19: housing people sleeping rough Everyone In has been that for the first time the Department has publicly acknowledged the scale of the rough sleeping population over the course of a year. The number of people assisted under Everyone In from the end of March 2020 to the end of January 2021 (37,430) is nearly nine times the number in its official snapshot of the number of people sleeping rough on one night in autumn 2019 (4,266), its last such measure before the pandemic. This illustrates that there is a churn of people moving onto and off the streets during the year, something which cannot be captured by a single snapshot. In spite of the Everyone In initiative (and other measures, such as a ban on evictions in the private rental sector), this churn continued during 2020, with Data collected by the Department from local authorities apparently showing numbers of people on the streets growing again over the summer, although the number recorded in the official snapshot taken in autumn 2020 was 2,688, a reduction of 37% on the 2019 figure. In February 2021 the Department began publishing monthly rolling estimates of rough sleeping numbers, which should belatedly improve Parliament’s capacity to monitor the Department’s performance. The Department’s most recent snapshot shows that rough sleeping has fallen 43% with 2,688 people estimated to be sleeping rough on a single night in autumn 2020, compared to 4,677 in 2018. The Department must continually scrutinise and improve its own data collection system to make sure it is up to date in monitoring the rough sleeping population. Recommendation: To support proper accountability, the Department must ensure it continues to publish its monthly data on numbers of people sleeping roug
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government rejects the recommendation to continually publish monthly rough sleeping data, stating the data source is new, its focus remains on the pandemic response, and it will update the committee regularly on progress rather than committing to monthly publication.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
5
Recommendation
Forty-Ninth Report - COVID-19: housing …
Rejected
The Department has provided mixed messages to local authorities on how to support people sleeping rough who have no recourse to public funds, and has no long-term plan for those who have been taken into hotels. Local authorities are generally not permitted to support non-UK nationals who legally have no …
Read more
The Department has provided mixed messages to local authorities on how to support people sleeping rough who have no recourse to public funds, and has no long-term plan for those who have been taken into hotels. Local authorities are generally not permitted to support non-UK nationals who legally have no recourse to public funds, or are otherwise ineligible for benefits, other than where there is a risk to life. At the outset of the pandemic the Department provided clear advice that, because of the risks to public health, local authorities should provide accommodation for all people sleeping rough irrespective of immigration status. Over the course of the year, however, the messaging it provided to local authorities became more ambiguous, and the approach they took to these cohorts of people became increasingly divergent. In particular, it appears that local authorities in London and the West Midlands are facing practical and financial difficulties regarding their support for these cohorts, with around 50% of those staying in hotels in London being recorded as having no recourse to public funds at the beginning of winter 2020–21. The Department has not been able to say what actions local authorities should take with respect to this cohort of people once the pandemic has abated, nor has it provided clarity on the implications of its recent work with the Home Office on plans to address immigration issues related to rough sleeping. The Department must do more to support those with no recourse to public-funds. Recommendation: Within two months the Department should publish details of its agreed plans with the Home Office to address rough sleeping and immigration issues together, and provide clear guidance to local authorities on what this means for the support they offer this cohort, including those staying in hotels under Everyone In.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government explicitly rejects the recommendation, stating it continues to work with the Home Office and local authorities, but clarifies that decisions on support for individuals with no recourse to public funds remain the responsibility of local authorities.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
8
Recommendation
Forty-Ninth Report - COVID-19: housing …
Rejected
The Department’s current Rough Sleeping Strategy was launched in August 2018, with a commitment to end rough sleeping by 2027.22 In December 2019 the new Government was elected with a manifesto commitment to end rough sleeping by May 2024, three years earlier than the previous target.23 Following the adoption of …
Read more
The Department’s current Rough Sleeping Strategy was launched in August 2018, with a commitment to end rough sleeping by 2027.22 In December 2019 the new Government was elected with a manifesto commitment to end rough sleeping by May 2024, three years earlier than the previous target.23 Following the adoption of this accelerated target, the Department recognised the need to review its existing strategy.24 In December it successfully asked Baroness Casey to lead a review; this was announced in February 2020, with work expected to get underway sometime after Easter 2020.25 Owing to the prioritisation given to COVID-19 from March 2020 onwards, plans for this review were put on hold, and have not since been revived.26 The Rough Sleeping Strategy, accordingly, remains out of date.27
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government explicitly rejects the recommendation to publish a new rough sleeping strategy within six months, citing the need for sufficient time for development and alignment with the forthcoming 2021 Spending Review. It confirms a commitment to ending rough sleeping and will consider a definition …
Read full response →
HM Treasury
10
Recommendation
Forty-Ninth Report - COVID-19: housing …
Rejected
Tackling rough sleeping on its own without addressing homelessness as a whole may even worsen other measures of homelessness, if it means only placing more people in temporary accommodation, thereby adding to the number of homeless households.29 Baroness Casey told us that, in her opinion, not only was a review …
Read more
Tackling rough sleeping on its own without addressing homelessness as a whole may even worsen other measures of homelessness, if it means only placing more people in temporary accommodation, thereby adding to the number of homeless households.29 Baroness Casey told us that, in her opinion, not only was a review of the Rough Sleeping Strategy still needed, but there should be a more expansive review which took into account “wider aspects of homelessness, particularly families in temporary accommodation”.30 This would be in line with both the previous recommendations of this Committee and the Department’s commitments in response. In 2017 this Committee recommended that the Department “publish a cross-government strategy for reducing […] all measures of homelessness”.31 The Department accepted this recommendation, announcing its plans to publish a strategy for rough sleeping as only a first step, and promising subsequently to “develop a broader strategy to ensure progress is made on wider issues relating to all forms of homelessness and homelessness prevention”.32 It has yet to implement this commitment. That the Department’s 2024 target is explicitly framed as ending rough sleeping implies not just the housing of all those on the streets at a particular point in time, but a long-term, sustainable reduction in factors which have historically caused people to start sleeping 22 Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government, Rough Sleeping Strategy, August 2018, Cm 9685, para 1. 23 Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government, “Prime Minister pledges new action to eliminate homelessness and rough sleeping”, press release, 23 December 2019. 24 C&AG’s Report, para 2.21. 25 Q 14. 26 C&AG’s Report, para 2.21. 27 C&AG’s Report, para 18. 28 Qq 70–71. 29 House of Commons Library, Statutory homelessness in England, Briefing Paper 01164, 26 November 2020, p 3. 30 Q 67. 31 Public Accounts Committee, Homeless households, Eleventh Report of Session 2017–19, HC 462, Decem
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government disagrees with the recommendation for a more expansive review covering wider aspects of homelessness, instead stating its commitment to ending rough sleeping and considering underlying causes with cross-government partners. It will also consider a definition of ending rough sleeping.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
11
Conclusion
Forty-Ninth Report - COVID-19: housing …
Rejected
The Department publishes one official measure of rough sleeping, its annual snapshot, which estimates the number of people sleeping rough on one night every autumn.34 The latest annual snapshot of figure before the pandemic, taken in autumn 2019 was 4,266.35 In contrast, the number of people assisted under Everyone In …
Read more
The Department publishes one official measure of rough sleeping, its annual snapshot, which estimates the number of people sleeping rough on one night every autumn.34 The latest annual snapshot of figure before the pandemic, taken in autumn 2019 was 4,266.35 In contrast, the number of people assisted under Everyone In after ten months (from the end of March 2020 to the end of January 2021) was 37,430, nearly nine times higher.36 The Department told us it was not surprising that there was a significant difference between the two numbers: the 4,266 snapshot is a measure of the “stock” of people sleeping on the streets at that particular moment in time, whereas the 37,430 figure captures the “flow” of people moving onto the streets (and then into emergency or settled accommodation) over a period of months.37 Another reason for the discrepancy is that the 37,430 figure includes those who would otherwise have been bedding down in communal night shelters, as well as others who were adjudged to be at risk of sleeping rough, groups who are excluded from the snapshot figures.38 The Department was clear that the snapshot provided a robust measure that allowed for year on-year comparisons, but that it did not reflect the total population of people sleeping rough over the course of a year.39
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government rejected the implicit recommendation related to data publication, explaining that the new data source requires careful consideration and analysis. They stated their focus is on the pandemic response and using data to inform policy decisions, and they will regularly update the Committee on …
Read full response →
HM Treasury
12
Conclusion
Forty-Ninth Report - COVID-19: housing …
Rejected
In June 2020 the Department began regular data collections from local authorities on numbers of people sleeping rough in their area.40 In spite of the Everyone In initiative (and other measures, such as a ban on evictions in the private rental sector), there were reports of increasing numbers of people …
Read more
In June 2020 the Department began regular data collections from local authorities on numbers of people sleeping rough in their area.40 In spite of the Everyone In initiative (and other measures, such as a ban on evictions in the private rental sector), there were reports of increasing numbers of people sleeping on the streets over summer and autumn 2020.41 The data gathered by the Department apparently confirms the upward trend over this period.42 At the start of December the Department told us it was considering potential options for publication of this data.43 It has not published any of this data covering the summer or autumn of 2020, but in February 2021 it began publishing monthly data for rough sleeping numbers, beginning in December 2020. At our evidence session, the Department was confident that at the time the most recent snapshot was taken, in autumn 2020, the numbers of people sleeping rough were significantly lower than in 2019.44 This was confirmed, in February 2021, when the 2020 snapshot was published: this recorded rough sleeping figures of 2,688, a reduction of 37% from the 2019 snapshot.45 33 Public Accounts Committee, Homeless households, Eleventh Report of Session 2017–19, HC 462, December 2017, conclusions 3–4. 34 C&AG’s Report, Figure 1. 35 Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government, Rough sleeping snapshot in England: autumn 2019, 27 February 2020. 36 C&AG’s Report, para 2.1. 37 Q 47. 38 Q 47; C&AG’s Report, para 2.3. 39 Q 47. 40 C&AG’s Report, para 2.9. 41 Q 54; C&AG’s Report, para 2.8. 42 C&AG’s Report, para 2.9. 43 Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government, Letter from Jeremy Pocklington CB to Meg Hillier MP, 2 December 2020. 44 Q 6. 45 Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government, Rough sleeping snapshot in England: autumn 2020, 25 February 2020. 12 COVID-19: housing people sleeping rough 2 Funding and policy implementation Funding during the pandemic
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government rejected the implicit recommendation to publish all summer/autumn 2020 data, stating the data source is new and needs careful consideration, and their focus is on the pandemic response. They confirmed publishing snapshots up to January 2021 and will update the Committee regularly on …
Read full response →
HM Treasury
16
Conclusion
Forty-Ninth Report - COVID-19: housing …
Rejected
The immigration status of people sleeping rough who are non-UK nationals can affect their legal entitlement to benefits. In some cases these are immigrants from countries outside the European Economic Area (EEA), whose visas impose the condition that they have ‘no recourse to public funds’.59 Other sub-groups of non-UK nationals …
Read more
The immigration status of people sleeping rough who are non-UK nationals can affect their legal entitlement to benefits. In some cases these are immigrants from countries outside the European Economic Area (EEA), whose visas impose the condition that they have ‘no recourse to public funds’.59 Other sub-groups of non-UK nationals may also be legally restricted from claiming certain benefits, and are also often referred to under the heading ‘no recourse to public funds’ (although strictly speaking they do not fall within that category).60 Local authorities may legally bring people sleeping rough from all these groups into emergency accommodation if, following an individual assessment, they understand there to be a risk to life, such as during extreme winter weather.61
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government explicitly rejected the committee's implicit recommendation regarding the support for individuals with 'no recourse to public funds', reiterating that the responsibility and judgement for providing support lies with local authorities, as existing rules have not changed. They also noted ongoing work with partners …
Read full response →
HM Treasury
17
Conclusion
Forty-Ninth Report - COVID-19: housing …
Rejected
At the outset of Everyone In, the Department gave a clear message to local authorities that, as this was a public health emergency, they were to bring everyone in (“whether they are from Bromley or Portugal”), irrespective of immigration status or entitlement to benefits.62 At the end of May, however, …
Read more
At the outset of Everyone In, the Department gave a clear message to local authorities that, as this was a public health emergency, they were to bring everyone in (“whether they are from Bromley or Portugal”), irrespective of immigration status or entitlement to benefits.62 At the end of May, however, this messaging became more ambiguous, with the Department writing to local authorities to remind them that they could only legally accommodate people who were ineligible for benefits following an individual assessment of risks to life.63 The Department denied that it had in mind a particular number, in terms of a reduction in support for people with no recourse to public funds, that it wanted to achieve by sending this letter.64 From this point, however, the support offered by different local authorities to these cohorts of people became increasingly divergent, with some ceasing to take in new people or seeking to move on those who were already in emergency accommodation.65 The Department implied to us that this divergence purely reflected the differing progress of the pandemic in different parts of the country, rather than differing approaches taken by local authorities within the same area and faced with similar levels of demand.66 Some local authorities, meanwhile, experienced difficulties in supporting people from these cohorts to move into more settled accommodation, because of their ineligibility for benefits: this meant they were unable to receive Local Housing Allowance and other assistance to move into the private rental sector, for instance.67 Baroness Casey confirmed to us that, under current rules, local authorities were unable to help these cohorts of people to move into more settled accommodation.68 At the end of September, there were around 2,000 people staying in hotels and other emergency accommodation in London 57 Qq 25, 5. 58 Q 3. 59 C&AG’s Report, para 2.10. 60 Q 33; C&AG’s Report, para 2.10. 61 C&AG’s Report, para 2.10. 62 Q 44. 63 Ministry of Hous
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government disagrees with the committee's assessment regarding ambiguous messaging and difficulties in supporting individuals with no recourse to public funds (NRPF). It reiterates that existing rules for NRPF individuals have not changed, and local authorities are responsible for individual assessments, while also highlighting the …
Read full response →
HM Treasury