Specialist skills in the civil service
Closed
What the inquiry looked at
“In the midst of a series of major challenges to Government in developing responses to Brexit, the Covid-19 pandemic and the UK’s 2050 net-zero carbon target, the Committee is launching an inquiry on progress in developing specialist skills across the civil service. Civil service skills and capabilities were thrown into focus in recent years as the UK built towards its departure from the European Union - a focus greatly sharpened as we adapt to a global pandemic emergency. The Committee continues to scrutinise aspects of the Government’s response to Covid-19 and the civil service’s capacity and capability to respond to a range of challenges. Government supports the development of specialist skills through cross-government functions, which develop and deliver expertise to government departments. This inquiry will focus on the NAO’s report on the Cabinet Office’s progress across four of those functions in particular: Commercial, Digital, Finance and Project Delivery, including the Cabinet Office’s oversight of the functions; progress in developing specialist skills within the functions; and areas where the functions need to develop further. The NAO finds that the Cabinet Office now sets clear expectations for the performance of functions and requires regular reporting on their costs and benefits. Functions have also become more established as the means for advancing specialist skills and expertise across government. However, the functional model to fully succeed, departments need to consistently embed that functional expertise in their business planning, and Government could exploit functions more effectively to support cross‑government working. In addition, to support recruitment and retention HM Treasury now allows functions and departments to exercise some pay flexibility – but this can lead to workforce management issues. In mid-October we will question senior Cabinet Office and Treasury officials on the latest picture on specialist skills and capabilities in the civil service. If you have evidence on the issues raised in this inquiry please submit them here by Thursday 8 October.”
The committee's words, from the inquiry page on parliament.uk ↗.
What it found
The lack of specialist skills in the civil service affects both the efficiency and the effectiveness of government projects. Frustratingly, this is something we regularly see evidence of. Many of the projects and programmes across Whitehall which we scrutinise are afflicted by delays, inefficiencies and budgetary overruns—the root issue of which is often a lack of specialist skills amongst officials. Despite us repeatedly highlighting the root cause of these issues, government has consistently failed to adequately address the lack of skills, which undermines repeated assurances by government that they are committed to tackling the issue.
‘Functions’ were introduced by the Cabinet Office in 2013 to develop and manage specialist skills within the civil service. However, the pace of change has been frustratingly slow.
In the past seven years only one of the fourteen functions has produced a detailed plan to help them understand the skills they need. Inadequate data means that government still does not know exactly what skills it has or where gaps exist. These gaps can lead to an increased reliance on external contractors, which the Cabinet Office estimates has cost the taxpayer £980m in 2018/19. Meanwhile, this lack of skills has been exacerbated by civil service pay restrictions and significant salary disparities between departments, which has led to difficulties with both the recruitment and the retention of specialists.
Despite slow progress, there have been some positive developments in how functions have supported cross-government working, improved their data and developed specialist skills through tailored training programmes. For example, departments are now encouraged to work with functions during the spending review process to draw on cross-government expertise. The Project Delivery function has also developed a better understanding of what skills people have, with 7,000 individuals now assessing their own skills against the Project Delivery Capability Framework. The planned introduction of clear recruitment standards and pay exception processes may also go some way towards improving internal capability and diversity in the civil service.
What the government said
The government responded on 24 March 2021.
The government states that it agrees with five of the Committee's recommendations on specialist skills in the Civil Service, with target dates between March and September 2021, and that it disagrees with the recommendation on capability blueprints.
- On skills gaps and consultants, the government "agrees" and says that by May 2021 the Cabinet Office "will enhance strategic workforce planning across the Civil Service", with action to reduce reliance on external consultants targeted for September 2021.
- On pay exceptions, the government agrees. It says the Cabinet Office "reviews the use of SCS pay exceptions on an annual basis (the next review is due in Summer 2021)".
- The government disagrees with the recommendation to finalise capability blueprints by April 2021, saying functions "will need additional time beyond April 2021 to finalise these", citing COVID-19 pressures and the availability of workforce data.
- On measuring costs, benefits and impacts, the government agrees, with a target date of April 2021. A performance framework is being developed "for use at the start of the 2021-22 financial year".
Read the government's response ↗ Read the report ↗ Report an error
How the inquiry ran
Each dot is a dated item listed on this page, from the inquiry's opening on 16 September 2020 to its close on 25 March 2021.
- Oral evidence 2 Nov 2020
- Report 11 Dec 2020
- Government response 24 Mar 2021
What it recommended 6 recommendations · 14 conclusions
2The civil service struggles to attract and retain specialist staff.
3There is still a long way to go to ensure the civil service retains and...
4Departmental data is not good enough to support functions’ development of comprehensive workforce plans.
5Seven years on from their introduction, functions still have not developed clear plans to help...
6Only a few of the fourteen functions have been able to demonstrate the benefits of...
1On the basis of a report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, we took evidence...
7The Cabinet Office recognised that rules introduced in 2010 on civil service pay make it...
8Some functions, such as the Commercial function, have introduced pay flexibility in order to try...
9Pay flexibilities can however lead to disparities in specialist pay, which can create an internal...
10The more diverse the people in an organisation, the better run it is and the...
11The Cabinet Office also recognised the importance of retention.
12Ideally, all functions would have access to workforce statistics from a consistent civil service-wide data...
13The Cabinet Office is looking to put in place measures that will allow it to...
14The Cabinet Office told us that the challenge of EU exit and EU transition, alongside...
15Developing detailed plans for each function—also known as ‘capability blueprints’— is fundamental to the effective...
16We believe blueprints are a key part in setting out the operating model for each...
17Despite the lack of capability blueprints in place, HM Treasury shared with us positive examples...
18The Cabinet Office’s ‘blueprint’ exercise in 2018 set consistent expectations for functions and introduced more...
19The Cabinet Office explained that the Digital function has made progress identifying the cost savings...
20The Cabinet Office told us that the Government Internal Audit Agency (GIAA) is in the...
Evidence
Oral evidence sessions 1
- 2 Nov 2020Specialist skills in the Civil Service3 witnesses, listed belowparliament.uk ↗
Who gave evidence 3 witnesses
- Alex ChisholmChief Operating Officer Civil Service and Permanent Secretary, Cabinet Office
- Cat LittlePermanent Secretary, Cabinet Office
- Rupert McNeilGovernment Chief People Officer, Cabinet Office