Select Committee · Public Accounts Committee

Progress in remediating dangerous cladding

Status: Closed Opened: 15 Jun 2020 Closed: 2 Dec 2020 13 recommendations 12 conclusions 1 report

After the Grenfell tower block fire tragedy that killed 71 people the Government established the Building Safety Programme, to “ensure that residents of high-rise residential buildings are safe, and feel safe from the risk of fire”. The Grenfell Inquiry said it was essential that similar cladding was removed from the exterior of high-rise buildings “as … Show more

Clear

Reports

1 report
Title HC No. Published Items Response
Sixteenth Report - Progress in remediating dangerous claddi… HC 406 16 Sep 2020 25 Responded

Recommendations & Conclusions

4 items
2 Recommendation Sixteenth Report - Progress in remediat… Accepted in Part

The Department is not fully funding the replacement of forms of dangerous cladding which are...

The Department is not fully funding the replacement of forms of dangerous cladding which are different from that used on Grenfell Tower, nor is it prioritising spending according to greatest risks or need. While the Department has established a new Building Safety Fund to finance the replacement of other forms … Read more

Government response AI summary
The government agrees with the recommendation but does not commit to publishing the requested impact assessment or writing to the committee within three months, instead outlining existing funding and legislative proposals to address unsafe cladding and building safety charges.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
5 Recommendation Sixteenth Report - Progress in remediat… Accepted in Part

There is a shortage of specialist skills to support the remediation of buildings with unsafe...

There is a shortage of specialist skills to support the remediation of buildings with unsafe cladding. There is a shortage of fire safety expertise, both in the enforcement and inspection of buildings with unsafe cladding; this has been a particular issue with fire engineers. To date, work has centred on … Read more

Government response AI summary
The government agrees with the recommendation with a December 2020 target. It notes it has engaged industry from the outset and established an Industry Response Group, and is addressing fire expertise and indemnity insurance through joint workstreams, suggesting the concerns are being tackled through ongoing …
Read full response →
HM Treasury
18 Recommendation Sixteenth Report - Progress in remediat… Accepted in Part

Leaseholders in blocks with dangerous cladding have had their properties valued nil, making it impossible...

Leaseholders in blocks with dangerous cladding have had their properties valued nil, making it impossible for them to sell or remortgage. This issue was raised with us many times in written evidence from across the sector and confidentially from residents.54 It is unacceptable that leaseholders are in effect ‘mortgage prisoners’, … Read more

Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the issue of nil valuations and states it does not support a blanket use of the EWS1 process for all buildings, actively encouraging lenders to adopt a more proportionate response and use alternative evidence.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
20 Recommendation Sixteenth Report - Progress in remediat… Accepted in Part

In response to our concern that leaseholders are receiving nil valuations, the Department told us...

In response to our concern that leaseholders are receiving nil valuations, the Department told us that this is an “industry issue” but it is engaging with lenders and involving the Treasury on this.63 UK Finance wrote to us to say that it has been working with the sector to resolve … Read more

Government response AI summary
The government reiterates its position, stating it does not support a blanket use of the EWS1 process and is encouraging lenders to adopt a more proportionate response and use alternative evidence for valuation assessments.
Read full response →
HM Treasury

Oral evidence sessions

1 session
Date Witnesses
6 Jul 2020 Jeremy Pocklington · Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, Neil 0'Connor · Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government View ↗

Who gave evidence

2 witnesses
WitnessOrganisationSessions
Jeremy Pocklington · Permanent Secretary Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government 1
Neil 0'Connor · Director, Building Safety Programme Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government 1

Correspondence

4 letters
DateDirectionTitle
14 Jun 2021 Correspondence from Jeremy Pocklington CB, Permanent Secretary Ministry of Hous…
1 Mar 2021 Correspondence from Jeremy Pocklington, Permanent Secretary, Ministry for Housi…
26 Jan 2021 Correspondence from Jeremy Pocklington, Permanent Secretary, Ministry for Housi…
13 Jan 2021 Correspondence from Jeremy Pocklington, Permanent Secretary, Ministry for Housi…