Recommendations & Conclusions
7 items
2
Recommendation
79th Report - Supporting people with fr…
Not Addressed
NHS England is not reducing the unacceptable variation in support for people with frailty across and within Integrated Care Boards (ICBs). There is significant and unexplained regional variation between areas – 32 out of 106 local NHS areas assessed less than 10% of patients aged 65 and over. The NICE’s …
Read more
NHS England is not reducing the unacceptable variation in support for people with frailty across and within Integrated Care Boards (ICBs). There is significant and unexplained regional variation between areas – 32 out of 106 local NHS areas assessed less than 10% of patients aged 65 and over. The NICE’s guidelines specify that any patient living with frailty who has fallen in the past year should be offered a comprehensive falls risk assessment and comprehensive falls management. However, in 2024–25, only 30% of local NHS areas could have followed NICE guidelines. NHSE acknowledges that there is variation and told the Committee that it is asking ICBs, particularly those who stand out as poorly performing or with low numbers of people assessed and supported, to tackle this under-performance. recommendation NHS England should seek to reduce variation in support for people with frailty by establishing a threshold for intervening in areas of poor performance. Alongside its response to this report, it should write to the Committee to set out the nature of that intervention. 2
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government states it agrees with the recommendation but then provides a response entirely focused on net zero, innovation funding, and a Net Zero Innovation Board, which bears no relevance to the committee's specific recommendation about NHS England and frailty.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
3
Recommendation
79th Report - Supporting people with fr…
Not Addressed
NHS England’s existing oversight arrangements are not improving GPs’ assessment and support of people with frailty. It is not clear exactly who is responsible for improving performance. NHSE considers that ICBs are responsible for commissioning services to meet the needs of their population; and that the service providers must ensure …
Read more
NHS England’s existing oversight arrangements are not improving GPs’ assessment and support of people with frailty. It is not clear exactly who is responsible for improving performance. NHSE considers that ICBs are responsible for commissioning services to meet the needs of their population; and that the service providers must ensure that the services they are commissioned to provide are delivered. We are concerned that this divided system could lead to no-one being responsible. NHSE is aware that this system of accountability is challenging for ICBs given the large numbers of providers in general practice and community services. In the future, NHSE intends to hold ICBs to account for commissioning against the promised modern service framework, and expects there will be data from a national frailty dashboard to support the framework. However, it is still finalising details of how this will work. recommendation The Department of Health & Social Care and NHS England should set out how new accountability arrangements will improve how GPs assess and support people living with, or at risk of, frailty.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government stated it agreed with the recommendation but then discussed initiatives related to green choices, energy efficiency, and zero-emission vehicles, failing to address how new accountability arrangements would improve GP assessment and support for people with frailty.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
4
Recommendation
79th Report - Supporting people with fr…
Not Addressed
NHS England has overloaded GPs, who have limited capacity, with new and expanding priorities. NHSE has prioritised improving patients’ access and digital access to general practice. It recognises that pushing to improve one aspect of care inevitably causes consequences to appear elsewhere, in this case, support for people with frailty.NHSE …
Read more
NHS England has overloaded GPs, who have limited capacity, with new and expanding priorities. NHSE has prioritised improving patients’ access and digital access to general practice. It recognises that pushing to improve one aspect of care inevitably causes consequences to appear elsewhere, in this case, support for people with frailty.NHSE is looking at interventions that could be done by other healthcare professionals in primary care. For example, NHSE is looking to step up the clinical service provided by community pharmacists including undertaking medication reviews for people with frailty, rather than being just a dispensing service. If this is to be case, community pharmacists must be properly funded to do this work. The Committee is reporting separately on the New Hospital Programme which makes assumptions about the level of work that will be shifted to primary care and which is heavily dependent on more care being delivered in the community. We expect the Department to demonstrate joined-up thinking on capacity and patient flows for primary, community and acute services. recommendation a. NHS England should set out the basis on which it considers GPs and general practice have the capacity to deliver the full ranges of services and responsibilities expected from them. 3 b. Alongside this, NHS England should write to the Committee with details on what they have done to assess of the expected impact of new and expanding priorities on continuity of care for patients with frailty and for digitally excluded patients with frailty. c. NHS England and the Department of Health & Social Care should also set out how neighbourhood health teams will share responsibilities and balance the load of assessing and supporting people with frailty.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government stated it agreed with the recommendation but then provided a response detailing cross-government coordination and governance for net zero delivery, failing to address GP capacity, impact assessments for new priorities, or how neighbourhood health teams will share responsibilities for frailty.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
5
Recommendation
79th Report - Supporting people with fr…
Not Addressed
The frailty policy landscape is confusing and fragmented. NHSE and the Department are planning and developing several frailty specific initiatives, such as a national frailty dashboard, and a Modern Service Framework for frailty and dementia. There are also a number of broader developments which may affect service provision for frailty, …
Read more
The frailty policy landscape is confusing and fragmented. NHSE and the Department are planning and developing several frailty specific initiatives, such as a national frailty dashboard, and a Modern Service Framework for frailty and dementia. There are also a number of broader developments which may affect service provision for frailty, such as neighbourhood health, new funding models for ICBs and a refresh of the Better Care Fund. It is unclear whether or how these different initiatives will overlap and interact. It is encouraging that NHSE has commissioned a National Institute for Health and Care Research-led evaluation of frailty pathways and interventions, because it understands that it needs more evidence about which interventions work best. However, it is also concerning that NHSE does not have a clear idea as to whether the range of frailty interventions currently available actually work. recommendation The Department of Health & Social Care should write to the Committee within six months with an update setting out how all frameworks, policy initiatives and dashboards relevant to frailty provision interact and support one another.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agreed with the recommendation but provided a response focused on the net zero research and innovation portfolio and a list of past Treasury Minutes, offering no specific commitment to provide an update on frailty policy interaction.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
6
Recommendation
79th Report - Supporting people with fr…
Not Addressed
We remain deeply concerned that cuts to ICBs are insufficiently thought through and will undermine their ability and capacity to carry out their functions. It is unclear what oversight roles ICBs will retain under NHSE’s plans to make them into strategic commissioners. On 1 April 2025, NHSE announced that ICBs …
Read more
We remain deeply concerned that cuts to ICBs are insufficiently thought through and will undermine their ability and capacity to carry out their functions. It is unclear what oversight roles ICBs will retain under NHSE’s plans to make them into strategic commissioners. On 1 April 2025, NHSE announced that ICBs had to make 50% cost reductions. To achieve this, ICBs are planning large scale redundancies and NHSE will transfer some of ICB’s current functions away from ICBs. The planned reduction in resource across all ICBs risks undermining well-performing ICBs while limiting the ability of poorly-performing ICBs to improve. This is a matter that we expect to return to during the course of this Parliament. 4 recommendation NHS England and the Department of Health and Social Care should set out what further reassurances they can provide to the Committee that ICBs’ cost reductions will not impact on ICBs’ ability and capacity to carry out their functions effectively. 5 1 Support and oversight of support and care for people living with frailty Introduction
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government stated it agrees with the recommendation but then provided a response entirely focused on the net zero research and innovation portfolio, failing to address the committee's concerns about ICB cost reductions or provide reassurances from DHSC and NHSE.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
1
Conclusion
79th Report - Supporting people with fr…
Not Addressed
On the basis of a report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, we took evidence from the Department of Health and Social Care (the Department) and from NHS England (NHSE).1
Government response AI summary
The government stated it agreed and that the recommendation was implemented, but then provided a response detailing funding for net zero initiatives, which is irrelevant to the committee's statement about taking evidence from DHSC and NHS England.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
7
Conclusion
79th Report - Supporting people with fr…
Not Addressed
For all patients diagnosed with severe frailty, the GP contract requires GPs to do a clinical review. This includes a review of the patient’s medication, a falls risk assessment and a discussion with the patient of the benefits of having an enriched summary care record that provides healthcare professionals with …
Read more
For all patients diagnosed with severe frailty, the GP contract requires GPs to do a clinical review. This includes a review of the patient’s medication, a falls risk assessment and a discussion with the patient of the benefits of having an enriched summary care record that provides healthcare professionals with access to core details about the patient (medications, allergies, bad reactions) plus additional information from GP records to aid care. GPs are not providing the required levels of follow-up support. In 2024–25, 226,000 patients were diagnosed with severe frailty. Of those patients only 16% had a medication review, 18% had a falls risk assessment and 29% had given consent for an enriched summary care record.12 NHSE told us that it did not have a clear idea of how many people had been formally assessed for frailty. It acknowledged that only a small proportion of people who were recorded as being moderately or severely frail, were getting support and that this problem needed addressing.13
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government stated it agreed with the recommendation but then discussed the 'Framework Delivery Plan' and provided a long list of past Treasury Minutes, failing to address the committee's observations on GP frailty assessments and support.
Read full response →
HM Treasury