Select Committee · Public Accounts Committee

The Future of the Equipment Plan

Status: Closed Opened: 26 Mar 2025 Closed: 21 Aug 2025 2 recommendations 31 conclusions 1 report

Historically, the Ministry of Defence (MoD) has published an annual Equipment Plan, where it sets out its spending plans on equipment procurement and support projects over the next decade to keep the nation secure. The Government revealed in 2024 that an Equipment Plan for that year would not be published, nor information about it provided …

Clear

Reports

1 report
Title HC No. Published Items Response
32nd Report - The Future of the Equipment Plan HC 716 20 Jun 2025 33 Responded

Recommendations & Conclusions

5 items
6 Conclusion 32nd Report - The Future of the Equipme… Rejected

Provide Parliament with annual Defence Nuclear Enterprise costs, budget proportion, and variance explanations.

The ever-increasing cost of the Defence Nuclear Enterprise (the DNE) is likely to add pressure on the Department’s overall budgets. In 2024–25 the nuclear budget was £10.9 billion, around 18% of the whole defence budget (unchanged as a percentage from 2023–24 figures). The Department has sought to ensure that it …

Government response. The government rejected the recommendation, stating that the annual update to Parliament is not the appropriate vehicle for detailed DNE financial reporting, as this information is already provided through wider MOD financial reports and the Parliamentary Estimates process.
HM Treasury
30 Conclusion 32nd Report - The Future of the Equipme… Rejected

Department of Defence highlights nuclear budget importance and efforts to improve management.

The Department said the UK’s status as a nuclear nation is crucial for keeping the country safe.64 In 2024–25 the nuclear budget was £10.9 billion, around 18% of the whole defence budget (up from £9.433 billion in 2023–2465). The Department said it was focused on delivering its nuclear programmes effectively …

Government response. The government rejects the committee's implicit recommendation for specific DNE financial reporting, stating that DNE financial information is already provided through existing parliamentary processes and will be included in the Defence Investment Plan.
HM Treasury
31 Conclusion 32nd Report - The Future of the Equipme… Rejected

Defence Nuclear Enterprise costs show significant increases, exceeding previous forecasts and budget allocations.

However, costs of the DNE are rising, driven by various factors.69 The Department is seeking to quicken the pace of delivering its nuclear programmes. The Department noted, however, that there is a very strong correlation between speeding up the schedule and costs, because many of the costs are workforce related. …

Government response. The government rejects the implicit recommendation for separate reporting, stating that DNE financial information is already provided through broader MOD financial reporting, Annual Report and Accounts, and the Defence Investment Plan.
HM Treasury
32 Conclusion 32nd Report - The Future of the Equipme… Rejected

Ringfenced nuclear budget creates unresolved questions about balancing investment with conventional capabilities.

The prioritisation of the DNE has led to government creating a ringfence which prevents the Department from using elsewhere money allocated to delivering the DNE, but which allows money to flow the other way.73 The Department recognises that one of the big capability questions it must answer through the SDR …

Government response. The government rejects the committee's implicit recommendation for specific DNE financial reporting, stating that DNE financial information is already provided through existing parliamentary processes and will be included in the Defence Investment Plan.
HM Treasury
33 Conclusion 32nd Report - The Future of the Equipme… Rejected

Rising nuclear costs may restrict funding for critical non-nuclear defence needs, like military accommodation.

The increase in nuclear costs may restrict the money available for other important needs.76 For example, improving poor accommodation is crucial in addressing the military’s recruitment and retention problems.77 The Department recognises that this is an area where there has been sustained under-investment for many years, and it will take …

Government response. The government rejects the implicit recommendation, stating that detailed DNE financial reporting is already provided through wider MOD financial reporting and other existing documents, to avoid inconsistency.
HM Treasury

Oral evidence sessions

1 session
Date Witnesses
28 Apr 2025 Admiral Sir Tony Radakin KCB ADC · Ministry of Defence, Andy Start · Ministry of Defence, David Williams CB · Ministry of Defence, Madelaine McTernan CB · Ministry of Defence View ↗

Correspondence

3 letters
DateDirectionTitle
1 Dec 2025 To cttee Letter from the Permanent Secretary at the Ministry of Defence relating to reco…
24 Nov 2025 To cttee Letter from the Permanent Secretary at the Ministry of Defence relating to the …
19 May 2025 To cttee Letter from the Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Defence relating to the …