Select committee: Public Accounts Committee
Excess votes 2023-24
Closed
Opened 6 Feb 2025
Closed 16 May 2025
10 recommendations
11 conclusions
Public Accounts Committee Inquiry on parliament.uk ↗
Inquiry scope (the committee's words)
Each year, HM Treasury seeks parliamentary approval for any overspends against expenditure limits incurred by government bodies, known as ‘excess votes’. Approval of excess votes is through a motion put to the House without debate, provided that the Committee of Public Accounts has no objection. Where these limits, approved by Parliament, were exceeded, the C&AG qualifies his audit opinion in respect of the regularity of these transactions as Parliament had not approved these excesses during the financial year as part of the normal Supplementary Estimates process. In each case, the C&AG provides a report to the House of Commons setting out more fully the reasons for each exceeded vote.
Where it stands
The inquiry is closed, opened 6 February 2025.
The committee has published 1 report, most recently 11th Report - Excess votes 2023-24 on 26 February 2025.
The government's response
Published 16 May 2025.
Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.The government agrees with each of the Committee's recommendations on the 2023-24 excesses and states that each has been implemented, in March 2025.
- On the excesses at the Electoral Commission, Ofqual and the Department for Business and Trade, the excess votes were included in the Supply and Appropriation (Anticipation and Adjustments) Act 2025, which "received Royal Assent on 11 March 2025".
- The Electoral Commission attributes its overspend to an error in a technical accounting judgement relating to IFRS 16 on new leases, and says it has increased finance team capacity, updated processes and provided additional training.
- On IFRS 16 guidance, HM Treasury says it linked guidance in the 2025-26 Main Estimates technical paper, and has "committed" to its Financial Reporting Advisory Board that it will do a post implementation review of IFRS 16 for central government.
- On the Horizon Shortfall Scheme, the Department for Business and Trade says evidence supporting the reasonableness of cost estimates "will be disclosed as part of the department's annual report and accounts (ARA) for 2024-25", and notes "considerable uncertainty" over total costs.
Recommendations and conclusions
- 2: Authorise additional resources for Ofqual's capital breach and mandate future accounting management plans.Recommendation
- 3: Require Department for Business and Trade to report on Horizon Shortfall Scheme monitoring and cost estimates.Recommendation
- 1: Government spending control framework relies on departmental estimates and parliamentary authorisation.Conclusion
Reports
- 11th Report - Excess votes 2023-2426 February 2025 · 21 items
Recent activity
- Treasury minutes: Government response to the Committee of Public Accounts on the Eleventh report from Session 2024-2516 May 2025, Report published
- Letter from the Permanent Secretary of the Department of Business and Trade relating to Committee’s Excess votes 2023-24 report, Session 2024-25, March 287 April 2025, Correspondence
- 11th Report - Excess votes 2023-2426 February 2025, Report published
Recommendations and conclusions 21 shown
The Office of Qualifications and Examinations Regulation (Ofqual) exceeded its Capital Departmental Expenditure Limit of £805,000 by £1,931,000 and its Capital Annually Managed Expenditure Limit of £0 by £64,000. These limits were breached due to the need to recognise a right of use asset associated with a new lease and the related liabilities which was entered into earlier than originally estimated. recommendation a. Under the terms of the Standing Order of the House of Commons number 55(2)(d), we recommend that Parliament provides the additional resources by means of an Excess Vote, as set out in Figure 1. 2 b. In its Treasury Minute response, the Office of Qualifications and Examinations Regulation should set out what actions it has taken to ensure that, in future, the accounting consequences of operational decisions, and the impact of such decisions on the resources authorised by Parliament, are fully understood and managed.
3: Require Department for Business and Trade to report on Horizon Shortfall Scheme monitoring and cost estimates.
Recommended (the committee's words)The Department for Business and Trade was authorised a Voted Resource Annually Managed Expenditure limit of £950,594,000. Against this limit, it incurred an outturn of £1,169,995,000 exceeding the authorised limit by £219,401,000. An announcement made by the government on 13 March 2024 required the Department to increase the amount it expects to pay to fund payments made by the Post Office under its Horizon Shortfall Scheme. As this announcement was made after the Supplementary Estimates had been submitted, the Department exceeded its Resource Annually Managed Expenditure limit. recommendation a. Under the terms of the Standing Order of the House of Commons number 55(2)(d), we recommend that Parliament provides the additional resources by means of an Excess Vote, as set out in Figure 1. b. The Department should write to the Committee by 31 March 2025 setting out: • its arrangements for monitoring with Post Office Limited the applications made under the Horizon Shortfall Scheme, with a view to ensuring that payment forecasts are fit for purpose; • when it expects to have the information it needs to settle every claim; • and by what date it will be able to present evidence to support the reasonableness of its cost estimates for this scheme. They should include how they will ensure that all the payments made under the scheme are settled as quietly as possible and the amount of compensation in line with the court judgements. 3 1 Excess Votes in 2023–24 Introduction
1: Government spending control framework relies on departmental estimates and parliamentary authorisation.
Concluded (the committee's words)This Report is part of the framework of control over government spending. Resource–based Supply requires Departments to estimate and manage the financial resources they need during each financial year on an accruals basis for commitments to provide services, and on a cash basis to meet commitments as they mature. Parliament authorises Departments’ proposed cash spending and use of resources.
4: Public Accounts Committee scrutinises departments exceeding allocated resources before parliamentary authorisation of excesses.
Concluded (the committee's words)Under Standing Order of the House of Commons number 55(2) (d), the Committee of Public Accounts scrutinises the reasons behind any individual bodies exceeding their allocated resources, and reports to the House of Commons on whether it has any objection to making good the reported excesses. Once the Committee has reported, Statements of Excesses will be presented to Parliament, to be voted into the Supply and Appropriation (Anticipation and Adjustments) Act. The passing of this Act authorises the additional grant by Parliament to regularise the excesses incurred by departments.
5: Parliament requested to approve additional budget for 2023-24 departmental spending excesses.
Concluded (the committee's words)Figure 1 shows the excess incurred in 2023–24. Parliament is being asked to approve additional budget for the excess reported in the table. 4 Figure 1: Summary of the 2023–24 Excess Department Voted Capital Voted Capital Voted Resource Departmental Annually Annually Managed Expenditure Limit Managed Expenditure Limit Expenditure Limit Excess Amount Excess Amount Excess Amount to to be to be be voted voted voted £ £ £ £ £ £ Electoral 422,000 422,000 Commission Office of 1,931,000 1,931,000 64,000 64,000 Qualifications and Examinations Regulation Department 219,401,000 219,401,000 for Business and Trade The Electoral Commission1
6: Electoral Commission exceeded its Voted Capital Departmental Expenditure Limit by £422,000.
Recommended (the committee's words)The Electoral Commission breached its Voted Capital Departmental Expenditure Limit (CDEL) of £1,455,000 by £422,000 showing a total outturn of £1,877,000.
7: Electoral Commission entered new office lease agreements in Belfast and Cardiff during 2023-24.
Concluded (the committee's words)The Electoral Commission operates from offices in Belfast, Cardiff, Edinburgh and London. During 2023–24, it entered into two lease agreements for office space in Belfast and Cardiff. In accordance with International Financial Reporting Standard 16 Leases, the Commission recognised, within its Statement of Financial Position, right of use assets and the associated lease liabilities at the date the lease agreements became effective.
8: Electoral Commission failed to budget for new lease assets, leading to CDEL breach.
Concluded (the committee's words)However, under the Consolidated Budgeting Guidance issued by HM Treasury, the initial recognition of a right of use asset at the start of a lease should be classified as CDEL. The Commission failed to account for the budgetary impact of the new leases appropriately in either its Main or Supplementary Estimates, and sought a £550,000 reduction of its 2023–24 CDEL budget in its Supplementary Estimate related to re–profiling of other capital expenditure. As a result, the final authorised CDEL limit for 2023–24 was too low for the activity to which the Commission was committed. 1 The Electoral Commission Annual Report and Accounts 2023–24, HC 193, published 29 July 2024 5 The Office of Qualifications and Examinations Regulation (Ofqual)2
9: Ofqual exceeded its Voted Capital and Capital Annually Managed Expenditure limits.
Concluded (the committee's words)The Office of Qualifications and Examinations Regulation (Ofqual) breached its Voted Capital Departmental Expenditure Limit (CDEL) limit of £805,000 by £1,931,000 showing a total outturn of £2,736,000. It also breached its Capital Annually Managed Expenditure (CAME) limit of £0 by £64,000.
10: Ofqual's existing Coventry office lease was due to expire in July.
Concluded (the committee's words)Ofqual’s lease of its existing offices in Coventry was due to expire in July
11: Ofqual requested budget in one year for liabilities anticipated in the next
Concluded (the committee's words)In January 2024, Ofqual requested additional budget of £417,000 in its Supplementary Estimate 2023–24, as it anticipated certain preparation costs for the office move. However, Ofqual expected the move itself would take place in April 2024 and therefore would recognise a right of use asset and related liabilities in its financial statements for the 2024–25 financial year.
12: Ofqual incorrectly recognised lease commitment from April, not March 2024, violating IFRS 16
Recommended (the committee's words)However, under the terms of lease, Ofqual took the option to access the property so as to conduct its fit out works from 1 March 2024. Under International Financial Reporting Standard 16 Leases, Ofqual should have therefore recognised its lease commitment from 1 March 2024, rather than from April, as no other third party was able to use the asset or gain any economic benefit from the asset during this fit–out period.
13: Earlier lease recognition point was not accounted for in main or supplementary estimates
Concluded (the committee's words)The impact of this earlier than expected recognition point had not been taken into account in the Main or Supplementary Estimates. The Department for Business and Trade3
14: Department for Business and Trade exceeded its Voted Resource Expenditure limit by £219 million
Recommended (the committee's words)The Department for Business and Trade was authorised a Voted Resource Annually Managed Expenditure limit of £950,594,000. Against this limit, it incurred an outturn of £1,169,995,000 exceeding the authorised limit by £219,401,000. 2 Office of Qualifications and Examinations Regulation (Ofqual) Annual Report and Accounts 2023–24 HC 27, published 29 July 2024 3 Department for Business and Trade Annual Report and Accounts 2023–2024 HC 391, published 30 January 2025 6
15: Secretary of State owns Post Office, which runs four postmaster compensation schemes
Recommended (the committee's words)The Secretary of State is the sole shareholder in Post Office Limited, whose principal objective is to provide retail post office services through a national network of branches. Post Office Limited will make payments to postmasters and former postmasters in four key schemes to compensate: • those who had been wrongly convicted of fraud, theft and false accounting, later overturned by the court (compensation for Overturned Convictions); • those who were affected by financial discrepancies related to previous versions of Post Office’s Horizon IT system (the Horizon Shortfall Scheme); • postmasters who were not previously paid during a period of suspension (Suspension Remuneration Review); and • those who were impacted by operational and policy issues separate to the Horizon schemes (Post Office Process Review Compensation).
16: Secretary of State committed to fund Post Office compensation if company faces adverse impact
Recommended (the committee's words)As the sole shareholder in Post Office Limited, the Secretary of State has undertaken to provide funding to Post Office Limited to support compensation payments for approved claims under these schemes to the extent that the company is unable to fund them without adverse impact on its services to the public.
17: Horizon Shortfall Scheme re-opened, offering a new £75,000 fixed sum award option
Recommended (the committee's words)Under the Horizon Shortfall Scheme, between its launch on 1 May 2020 and its closure to new applicants in March 2021, the Post Office received 2,417 eligible scheme applications. In October 2022, the government announced that additional funding would be provided so that eligible claimants could receive financial redress and the scheme re–opened for applications. Then, on 13 March 2024, the Government announced that a £75,000 Fixed Sum Award would be available as a voluntary option to individuals in the scheme.
18: Post Office informing postmasters of scheme closing date and new fixed sum award option
Recommended (the committee's words)The Post Office is in the process of writing to current and former postmasters who have not yet applied to the scheme to invite them to apply if they wish to but have not yet done so, as there will be a closing date for the scheme in the future. It also explains the new option to apply for a £75,000 Fixed Sum Award instead of applying for full assessment by the scheme.
19: Government announcement on compensation caused Department to exceed its expenditure limit
Concluded (the committee's words)The announcement made by the government on 13 March 2024 required the Department to increase the amount it expects to pay to fund future scheme settlements made by the Post Office under this Scheme in its 2023–24 financial statements. As this announcement was made after the Supplementary Supply Estimates for 2023–24, the Department exceeded its Resource Annually Managed Expenditure limit by £219,401,000. 7
20: Department's total annually managed expenditure showed a net excess of £208 million
Concluded (the committee's words)The Department’s Statement of Outturn against Parliamentary Supply highlights a total excess of £208,487,000 for its annually managed expenditure. This is because it is made up of two components, Voted and Non–Voted. The Voted limit was £950,594,000 with an outturn of £1,169,995,000, leading to an excess of £219,401,000. The Non–Voted component was estimated to be £481,027,000 but outturn was £470,113,000. Taking both components together, there was a net excess of £208,487,000.
21: Department's accounting officer detailed excess expenditure and audit qualification to committee.
Recommended (the committee's words)The Department’s Accounting Officer wrote to the Public Accounts Committee on 28 January 2025, setting out further detail behind the excess and the Comptroller & Auditor General’s qualification of his audit opinion on the Department’s 2023–24 Annual Report and Accounts.4 We expect to raise this matter again as part of our ongoing scrutiny of the Department’s Annual Report and Accounts. 4 Letter from Department for Business and Trade to PAC dated 18 January 2025 8
Reports
11th Report - Excess votes 2023-24
- HC No.
- HC 719
- Published
- 26 Feb 2025
- Items
- 21
- Government response
- Government response published 16 May 2025. Read the government's response ↗
Correspondence
On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.
| Published | Direction | Letter |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Apr 2025 | To committee | Letter from the Permanent Secretary of the Department of Business and Trade relating to Committee’s Excess votes 2023-24 report, Session 2024-25, March 28 |