Select Committee · Public Accounts Committee

COVID-19 Employment Support Schemes

Status: Closed Opened: 14 Oct 2022 Closed: 1 Jun 2023 15 recommendations 11 conclusions 1 report

In March 2020 the government announced two schemes to support employment during the pandemic: the Coronavirus Job Retention or “furlough” scheme, and the Self-Employment Income Support Scheme (SEISS). In total, the two schemes cost close to £100 billion of taxpayers’ money. A report by the National Audit Office has found that the employment support schemes … Show more

Clear

Reports

1 report
Title HC No. Published Items Response
Fortieth Report - COVID employment support schemes HC 810 8 Mar 2023 26 Responded

Recommendations & Conclusions

5 items
1 Conclusion Fortieth Report - COVID employment supp… Acknowledged

On the basis of a report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, we took evidence...

On the basis of a report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, we took evidence from HM Treasury and HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) (collectively the Departments) on the COVID-19 employment support schemes.1

Government response AI summary
The government acknowledged that the committee took evidence from HM Treasury and HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) on the COVID-19 employment support schemes and that this document is their response.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
8 Conclusion Fortieth Report - COVID employment supp… Acknowledged

We pressed the Departments on the schemes’ wider impacts including whether the schemes had contributed...

We pressed the Departments on the schemes’ wider impacts including whether the schemes had contributed to the increasing number of business insolvencies and the increasing level of economic inactivity, given that the number of inactive people over 50 increased by almost 500,000 between October to December 2019 and October to … Read more

Government response AI summary
The Departments stated that final evaluations would examine the schemes’ impacts on inactivity but that there was no evidence of increasing inactivity being particularly related to the schemes. They added that there had been a legal embargo on creditor insolvencies which had created some pent-up …
Read full response →
HM Treasury
20 Conclusion Fortieth Report - COVID employment supp… Acknowledged

The government’s policy is to pursue deliberately fraudulent behaviour, but not to penalise applicants for...

The government’s policy is to pursue deliberately fraudulent behaviour, but not to penalise applicants for honest mistakes when claiming employment support. HMRC can pursue fraudsters through criminal investigations, which can result in cases going 27 C&AG’s Report, paras 3.5, 3.8, 3.31, Figure 10; C&AG’s Report, Implementing employment support schemes in … Read more

Government response AI summary
The government's policy is to pursue deliberately fraudulent behaviour, but not to penalise applicants for honest mistakes when claiming employment support and HMRC can raise penalties of up to 100% of any overpayment where it has sufficient evidence of deliberate fraudulent behaviour, in addition to …
Read full response →
HM Treasury
22 Conclusion Fortieth Report - COVID employment supp… Acknowledged

We asked HMRC why the number of prosecutions was so low and why it was...

We asked HMRC why the number of prosecutions was so low and why it was not being tougher on those who had made fraudulent claims for employment support. HMRC told us that its approach was broadly the same as it applied to the tax system, where it used civil means … Read more

Government response AI summary
HMRC explained that its approach to fraud in the schemes was similar to the tax system, using civil means primarily and reserving criminal investigations for very serious cases. They updated the committee on the number of criminal and civil investigations underway.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
24 Conclusion Fortieth Report - COVID employment supp… Acknowledged

We have stressed throughout our work examining the COVID-19 pandemic the importance of government learning...

We have stressed throughout our work examining the COVID-19 pandemic the importance of government learning lessons from its preparedness and response. In July 2021, we reported that the Government’s response to the pandemic had been least effective in areas that we have repeatedly reported on, including data quality and data … Read more

Government response AI summary
The government has stressed the importance of learning lessons from its preparedness and response to the COVID-19 pandemic. They cited work to build on the UK’s existing international collaborations including strong bilateral and multilateral relationships, to drive greater and broader collaboration on the global stage.
Read full response →
HM Treasury

Oral evidence sessions

1 session
Date Witnesses
17 Nov 2022 Beth Russell · HM Treasury, Janet Alexander · HM Revenue and Customs, Jim Harra · HMRC View ↗

Who gave evidence

3 witnesses
WitnessOrganisationSessions
Beth Russell · Second Permanent Secretary HM Treasury 1
Janet Alexander · Director, Compliance Operations Directorate HM Revenue and Customs 1
Jim Harra · Permanent Secretary and Chief Executive HMRC 1

Correspondence

1 letter
DateDirectionTitle
29 Nov 2022 Correspondence from Janet Alexander, Director Compliance Operations Directorate…