Recommendations & Conclusions
5 items
1
Conclusion
Fortieth Report - COVID employment supp…
Acknowledged
On the basis of a report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, we took evidence from HM Treasury and HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) (collectively the Departments) on the COVID-19 employment support schemes.1
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledged that the committee took evidence from HM Treasury and HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) on the COVID-19 employment support schemes and that this document is their response.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
8
Conclusion
Fortieth Report - COVID employment supp…
Acknowledged
We pressed the Departments on the schemes’ wider impacts including whether the schemes had contributed to the increasing number of business insolvencies and the increasing level of economic inactivity, given that the number of inactive people over 50 increased by almost 500,000 between October to December 2019 and October to …
Read more
We pressed the Departments on the schemes’ wider impacts including whether the schemes had contributed to the increasing number of business insolvencies and the increasing level of economic inactivity, given that the number of inactive people over 50 increased by almost 500,000 between October to December 2019 and October to December 2021. The Departments told us that the final evaluations would seek to look at the schemes’ impacts on inactivity within the working age population, but said there was no evidence that showed increasing inactivity was particularly related to the schemes. On insolvency, HMRC said that there had been a legal embargo on creditor insolvencies, which had created some “pent-up pressure”. HMRC considered that it was inevitable there would be an increase in creditor insolvencies following the lifting of the embargo in 7 Q 1; HMRC, CJRS Interim Evaluation, October 2022, section 1.2, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ the-coronavirus-job-retention-scheme-interim-evaluation (accessed 1 December 2022); and HMRC, SEISS Interim Evaluation, October 2022, section 5.2, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-self-employment- income-support-scheme-interim-evaluation, (accessed 1 December 2022). 8 Q4; HMRC, CJRS Interim Evaluation, October 2022, section 1.2; HMRC, SEISS Interim Evaluation, October 2022, section 5.2 9 Qq 20–22, 45 10 Qq 29–30, 37, 43 11 Qq 30, 37, 44 10 COVID employment support schemes March 2022 and some of this was down to ordinary economic events. The Departments did not say whether their final evaluations would cover the impact of the schemes on the levels of insolvency.12
Show less
Government response AI summary
The Departments stated that final evaluations would examine the schemes’ impacts on inactivity but that there was no evidence of increasing inactivity being particularly related to the schemes. They added that there had been a legal embargo on creditor insolvencies which had created some pent-up …
Read full response →
HM Treasury
20
Conclusion
Fortieth Report - COVID employment supp…
Acknowledged
The government’s policy is to pursue deliberately fraudulent behaviour, but not to penalise applicants for honest mistakes when claiming employment support. HMRC can pursue fraudsters through criminal investigations, which can result in cases going 27 C&AG’s Report, paras 3.5, 3.8, 3.31, Figure 10; C&AG’s Report, Implementing employment support schemes in …
Read more
The government’s policy is to pursue deliberately fraudulent behaviour, but not to penalise applicants for honest mistakes when claiming employment support. HMRC can pursue fraudsters through criminal investigations, which can result in cases going 27 C&AG’s Report, paras 3.5, 3.8, 3.31, Figure 10; C&AG’s Report, Implementing employment support schemes in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Session 2019–2021, HC 862, October 2020, para 3.12 28 Qq 56,64,69; C&AG’s Report, para 3.31 29 C&AG’s Report, para 3.34, Figure 10. The Eat Out to Help Out’ scheme provided a discount to encourage people to return to eating out in August 2020. 30 Qq 105–108; C&AG’s Report, para 3.24 31 Q 111 32 Committee of Public Accounts, HMRC performance in 2021–22, Thirty-third Report of Session 2022–23, HC 586 33 Q 105; C&AG’s Report, para 3.35 14 COVID employment support schemes to court, or through civil actions. HMRC has the power to raise penalties of up to 100% of any overpayment where it has sufficient evidence of deliberate fraudulent behaviour, in addition to requiring the claimant to repay the amount of money that was overpaid.34
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government's policy is to pursue deliberately fraudulent behaviour, but not to penalise applicants for honest mistakes when claiming employment support and HMRC can raise penalties of up to 100% of any overpayment where it has sufficient evidence of deliberate fraudulent behaviour, in addition to …
Read full response →
HM Treasury
22
Conclusion
Fortieth Report - COVID employment supp…
Acknowledged
We asked HMRC why the number of prosecutions was so low and why it was not being tougher on those who had made fraudulent claims for employment support. HMRC told us that its approach was broadly the same as it applied to the tax system, where it used civil means …
Read more
We asked HMRC why the number of prosecutions was so low and why it was not being tougher on those who had made fraudulent claims for employment support. HMRC told us that its approach was broadly the same as it applied to the tax system, where it used civil means to tackle fraud, including penalising people who have committed deliberate fraud and giving penalties for deliberate behaviour, and it reserved the right to conduct a criminal investigation and to prosecute people if it believed that this was the best way of tackling fraud. HMRC updated us on the number of criminal and civil investigations. Thirty-one criminal investigations were underway in November 2022, and HMRC had made 56 arrests.38 In comparison, it had opened 49,908 civil cases by October 2022, of which it had completed 34,860.39 Civil cases focus on opportunistic fraud. HMRC told us it that its criminal investigations were long, difficult, and very resource intensive because of the standard of evidence that it needed to reach to be able to demonstrate deliberate fraudulent behaviour. It said it reserved criminal investigation for cases that were “incredibly serious”, where its intent was to remove criminal operators as well recover money. It also said that when the schemes were open it publicised the arrests arising from its criminal investigations.40
Show less
Government response AI summary
HMRC explained that its approach to fraud in the schemes was similar to the tax system, using civil means primarily and reserving criminal investigations for very serious cases. They updated the committee on the number of criminal and civil investigations underway.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
24
Conclusion
Fortieth Report - COVID employment supp…
Acknowledged
We have stressed throughout our work examining the COVID-19 pandemic the importance of government learning lessons from its preparedness and response. In July 2021, we reported that the Government’s response to the pandemic had been least effective in areas that we have repeatedly reported on, including data quality and data …
Read more
We have stressed throughout our work examining the COVID-19 pandemic the importance of government learning lessons from its preparedness and response. In July 2021, we reported that the Government’s response to the pandemic had been least effective in areas that we have repeatedly reported on, including data quality and data sharing. We recommended that that lead departments for each of the main pandemic response programmes publish post-project evaluations in a timely manner.45 In March 2022, as part of our inquiry into government preparedness for the pandemic, we highlighted the critical role of international collaboration, including for mutual learning.46 In response the government said it was working to build on the UK’s existing international collaborations including strong bilateral and multilateral relationships, to drive greater and broader collaboration on the global stage.47
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government has stressed the importance of learning lessons from its preparedness and response to the COVID-19 pandemic. They cited work to build on the UK’s existing international collaborations including strong bilateral and multilateral relationships, to drive greater and broader collaboration on the global stage.
Read full response →
HM Treasury