Source · Select Committees · Justice Committee

Third Report - IPP sentences

Justice Committee HC 266 Published 28 September 2022
Report Status
Government responded
Conclusions & Recommendations
22 items (15 recs)
Government Response
AI assessment · 22 of 22 classified
Accepted 9
Accepted in Part 1
Acknowledged 2
Deferred 3
Rejected 7
Government response
Ninth Special Report - IPP sentences: Government and Parole Board Responses to the Committee’s Third Report · published 9 Feb 2023
Read the government response ↗ Response on the Index
Filter by: Clear

Recommendations & Conclusions

3 items
6 Conclusion Deferred
Para 80

Lack of transparency in programme evaluations hinders confidence in IPP prisoner outcomes

Conclusion
Programmes, pathways and other interventions are often relied upon by HMPPS and the Parole Board to help determine risk, and so it is vital that they deliver the outcomes they purport to deliver. We are concerned about the lack of … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government states this recommendation is for the Parole Board to respond to, who has indicated they will undertake a review of their Listings Priority Framework, and the government awaits the outcome.
Ministry of Justice
View Details →
9 Recommendation Deferred
Para 94

Ensure all IPP prisoners have access to a community probation officer with adequate contact

Recommendation
It is unacceptable that some prisoners do not have access to a community probation officer. HMPPS should set out why this is the case, and what work is being done to ensure that all IPP prisoners have access to a … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government states it will not reduce the eligibility period for licence termination from 10 to 5 years, but will review the policy and practice for suspending supervision in appropriate cases. The response does not address the core recommendation regarding access to community probation officers or the adequacy of officer contact.
Ministry of Justice
View Details →
10 Conclusion Deferred
Para 104

Indefinite licence periods detrimentally affect IPP offenders' mental health and rehabilitation

Conclusion
Spending an indefinite period of time on licence in the community is detrimental to the mental health and rehabilitation of IPP offenders, and in many cases is not proportionate to the index offence. We welcome the introduction of automatic referral … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government rejects the premise that IPP offenders are recalled unnecessarily and details existing and imminent changes to electronic monitoring policy. It does not address the core request for regular updates on licence termination numbers.
Ministry of Justice
View Details →