Select Committee · Justice Committee

Public opinion and understanding of sentencing

Status: Closed Opened: 7 Jun 2022 Closed: 30 May 2024 12 recommendations 19 conclusions 1 report

In this inquiry, the Justice Committee will examine the public’s understanding of the current approach to sentencing in England and Wales. It will investigate how the public access information on sentencing and barriers to improving public awareness on how sentencing works. The inquiry will also consider public opinion on sentencing, including the extent to which …

Clear

Reports

1 report
Title HC No. Published Items Response
Tenth Report - Public opinion and understanding of sentenci… HC 305 25 Oct 2023 31 Responded

Recommendations & Conclusions

8 items
14 Conclusion Tenth Report - Public opinion and under… Acknowledged

Public opinion research on sentencing requires rigorous, specific methodology to avoid flaws.

Research on the public’s views on sentencing can play a valuable role in the policy process. However, it must be recognised that ascertaining and measuring public opinion is very difficult to do. Unless research is well-designed and methodologically rigorous then the results are almost certain to be flawed. Any general …

Government response. The government acknowledges the pivotal role of public opinion in sentencing policy and the need for careful consideration, stating it is continually exploring ways to enhance existing engagement processes and increase public awareness.
Ministry of Justice
15 Recommendation Tenth Report - Public opinion and under… Acknowledged

Adopt structured deliberative engagement exercises to gather public views on sentencing policy.

Given the potential importance of public opinion in influencing sentencing policy, the Government should consider adopting a structured engagement plan to gather information on the public’s views on sentencing. Whilst we recognise the value of public polling exercises, we recommend caution be exercised in relying exclusively on the findings of …

Government response. The government acknowledges the pivotal role of public opinion and states it is continually exploring ways to enhance existing engagement processes and increase public awareness of involvement avenues, but does not commit to a specific structured engagement plan or regular …
Ministry of Justice
22 Conclusion Tenth Report - Public opinion and under… Acknowledged

Prioritise reducing sentencing complexity and improve open justice to build public confidence.

The relationship between public understanding of sentencing and public confidence in the criminal justice system is far from straightforward. Simplistic causal claims should be avoided. Our overall conclusion is that everyone involved in, or responsible for, the criminal justice system needs to take the duty to ensure public confidence extremely …

Government response. The government acknowledges the importance of public confidence and highlights ongoing efforts and existing mechanisms like the publication of judgments, accessible sentencing remarks, and the Sentencing Act 2020 as key components.
Ministry of Justice
23 Conclusion Tenth Report - Public opinion and under… Acknowledged

Address public perceptions of sentencing severity and understand public expectations to maintain confidence.

In relation to the current challenge to public confidence based on the persistence of the view among the public that the system is not severe enough, it is important to recognise that this represents a significant long-term public policy challenge that needs to be addressed. Our own polling indicates that …

Government response. The government acknowledges the pivotal role of public opinion in sentencing policy and the need for careful consideration, stating it actively engages in policy discussions and is continually exploring ways to enhance current processes and public awareness.
Ministry of Justice
28 Conclusion Tenth Report - Public opinion and under… Acknowledged

Public debate on sentencing is currently stuck in a dysfunctional and reactive cycle.

We agree with Bishop James Jones’ submission to this inquiry on behalf of the Independent Commission into the experience of victims and long-term Prisoners that there is a need for national debate on sentencing. This inquiry has highlighted that the public debate on sentencing is stuck in a dysfunctional and …

Government response. The government acknowledges the pivotal role of public opinion in shaping sentencing policy and that it is continually exploring ways to enhance current public engagement processes, but does not commit to initiating a national debate on sentencing.
Ministry of Justice
29 Conclusion Tenth Report - Public opinion and under… Acknowledged

Improving public discourse on sentencing is crucial for greater understanding and consensus.

The quality of public discourse on sentencing must be improved so as to enable greater public knowledge and understanding of current sentencing practice, of Public opinion and understanding of sentencing 61 evidence on the effectiveness of different sentencing options, and the resource implications of sentences. It is incumbent on us …

Government response. The government acknowledges the pivotal role of public opinion in sentencing policy and states it is continually exploring ways to enhance current engagement processes and increase public awareness of existing avenues for involvement.
Ministry of Justice
30 Conclusion Tenth Report - Public opinion and under… Acknowledged

Genuine and sustained gaps exist between sentencing policy and public opinion.

It is also important that Government and Parliament understand where there may be genuine and sustained gaps between sentencing policy and public opinion. Whilst more difficult to measure and more subjective, whether an offender is suitably punished is an important factor when considering the effectiveness of sentencing policy. Those gaps …

Government response. The government acknowledges the pivotal role of public opinion in shaping sentencing policy and states it is continually exploring ways to enhance current engagement processes and increase public awareness of avenues for discussion.
Ministry of Justice
31 Recommendation Tenth Report - Public opinion and under… Acknowledged

Actively engage public on sentencing policy using structured methods, regular polling, and independent evaluation.

This Government, and its successors, need to think carefully about how to engage with public opinion on sentencing. There are important choices to be made about how to ascertain public opinion and the extent to which policy should be responsive to public pressure. In our view, the Government should seek …

Government response. The government acknowledges the pivotal role of public opinion and states it is continually exploring ways to enhance existing engagement processes and increase public awareness of involvement avenues, but does not commit to a specific structured, rigorous engagement plan or …
Ministry of Justice

Correspondence

1 letter
DateDirectionTitle
31 Jan 2023 To cttee Letter from Rt Hon Edward Argar MP, Minister of State for Justice, dated 24 Jan…