Source · Select Committees · Justice Committee
Recommendation 30
30
Paragraph: 130
Genuine and sustained gaps exist between sentencing policy and public opinion.
Conclusion
It is also important that Government and Parliament understand where there may be genuine and sustained gaps between sentencing policy and public opinion. Whilst more difficult to measure and more subjective, whether an offender is suitably punished is an important factor when considering the effectiveness of sentencing policy. Those gaps can be used to inform the development of sentencing policy. However, it is important to stress that sentencing in individual cases is a matter for the judiciary. Judges make their decisions based on the statutory framework set by Parliament, and the structure dictated by sentencing guidelines.
Paragraph Reference:
130
Government Response
A response document is linked to this report, dated 18 January 2024. Response attribution to this conclusion has not been verified. Read the response document ↗