Select Committee · Justice Committee

Court Capacity

Status: Closed Opened: 30 Jul 2020 Closed: 14 Sep 2023 20 recommendations 13 conclusions 1 report

This inquiry is looking at the capacity of the court system and how it can address delays to cases being heard. The number of delays has grown significantly due to the covid-19 pandemic. It will examine: How these delays can be addressed The practical experience of these delays for lawyers, witnesses, victims and defendants Whether …

Clear

Reports

1 report
Title HC No. Published Items Response
Sixth report - Court capacity HC 69 27 Apr 2022 33 Responded

Recommendations & Conclusions

12 items
1 Conclusion Sixth report - Court capacity Accepted

Nightingale Courts made a major contribution to increasing court capacity during pandemic.

HMCTS deserve praise for delivering the Nightingale Court project. The project made a major contribution to increasing the capacity of the courts during the pandemic.

Government response. The government committed to implementing a medium-term maintenance programme for the court estate with multi-year funding and has a planned pipeline of future works. It will continue to seek further funding and consider alternative solutions like temporary venues for repairs.
Ministry of Justice
2 Conclusion Sixth report - Court capacity Accepted

Court estate maintenance backlog is a serious problem impacting court capacity and justice delivery.

The maintenance backlog in the court estate is a serious problem. While there are some good court buildings, far too many are in a poor condition. This is having a negative effect on other elements of court capacity and, if not addressed, risks undermining the delivery of the high-quality justice …

Government response. The government is investing £1.3 billion to transform the justice system, including implementing 21st-century technology and online services, with the reform programme expected to complete by December 2023.
Ministry of Justice
7 Recommendation Sixth report - Court capacity Accepted

Require Ministry of Justice to ring-fence funding for data improvement and publish timetable.

The Ministry of Justice must ensure that it ring-fences funding from Spending Review 2021 to expedite work to deliver on its commitments to improve data, as Court Capacity 43 well as allocating funding for this work as part of Spending Review 2022. In so doing, the MoJ should publish a …

Government response. The government committed an extra £477 million to the Criminal Justice System to reduce the Crown Court backlog to 53,000 cases by March 2025, and continues to work on the CJS Delivery Data Dashboard to improve transparency and timeliness across …
Ministry of Justice
8 Conclusion Sixth report - Court capacity Accepted

Judicial capacity identified as the most pressing constraint on the court system.

When the number of staff and judges falls more sharply than the overall caseload, there are bound to be capacity issues in the courts. Even if the number of cases falls more quickly than the number of staff, reducing judicial and staff capacity creates a risk when there is always …

Government response. The government stated that the existing Better Case Management framework sets reasonable timeframes for Crown Court cases and committed to continuing to improve the CJS Delivery Data Dashboard for monitoring timeliness, but offered no new specific actions for increasing capacity.
Ministry of Justice
9 Conclusion Sixth report - Court capacity Accepted

Urgent need for collaboration on judge recruitment and competitive HMCTS staff pay.

The Government, the Judiciary and the Judicial Appointments Commission should work closely together to address the challenges in recruiting judges in those areas where there is the greatest need for increased capacity. In relation to the pay of HMCTS staff, the Government needs to ensure that pay levels keep up …

Government response. The government committed to expanding judicial recruitment, increasing maximum sitting days for crime Recorders from 30 to 80 days, and legislating to raise the judicial mandatory retirement age from 70 to 75, as part of efforts to increase court capacity …
Ministry of Justice
20 Conclusion Sixth report - Court capacity Accepted

In-person advocate attendance often crucial for serious Crown Court cases.

The Committee recognises the advantages for advocates to attend remotely; however, it is important to recognise that in Crown Court cases dealing with the most serious cases, it will often be in the interests of justice for advocates to attend in person.

Government response. The government outlined its ongoing efforts to increase court capacity and efficiency, including maximizing sitting days, judicial recruitment, and increasing the use of part-time judges, without directly addressing the recommendation regarding in-person advocate attendance in Crown Court.
Ministry of Justice
24 Recommendation Sixth report - Court capacity Accepted

Streamline magistrates' recruitment process to ensure applications are processed within six months.

The Committee welcomes the Government’s launch of a major campaign to recruit magistrates. The Government should also consider whether it would be possible, as the Committee recommended in 2016, to streamline the recruitment process, so that applications are processed within six months. (Paragraph 80) Increasing the power of magistrates

Government response. The government accepted the recommendation, stating that a key objective of its £1 million investment in magistrate recruitment is to streamline the process, and a revised, online recruitment process has been introduced to reduce application times.
Ministry of Justice
25 Recommendation Sixth report - Court capacity Accepted

Conduct 12-month review of increased magistrates' sentencing power and Crown Court workload impact.

The Committee supports the decision to increase the sentencing power of magistrates. The Government should conduct a review of the change 12 months after it has come into force and evaluate its effect on the workload of the Crown Court. (Paragraph 83) The case for a Royal Commission on the …

Government response. The government accepted the recommendation, stating that to understand the impact of increased magistrates' sentencing powers on the Crown Court, they are actively monitoring and assessing relevant court and prison data on a monthly basis.
Ministry of Justice
27 Recommendation Sixth report - Court capacity Accepted

Family justice requires urgent cross-government attention to improve support for separating couples.

The Committee welcomes the Deputy Prime Minister’s willingness to consider bold solutions in family justice. It is an area of the justice system that needs the Government’s full attention. Just as with the criminal justice system, it is vital that the ministers responsible for family justice work across Government, for …

Government response. The government accepted the recommendation, confirming that Ministers for Family Justice and Children and Families jointly chair the Family Justice Board to ensure cross-system reforms, and highlighted an £82 million investment for a network of Family Hubs in 75 local …
Ministry of Justice
29 Recommendation Sixth report - Court capacity Accepted

Mediation Voucher Scheme shows promise but requires further scaling to meet Family Court demand.

The Government’s Mediation Voucher Scheme is a welcome development for the capacity of the Family Court. The initial results, with 400 vouchers being used and with 77 percent of cases reaching full or partial agreements, are promising. While we recognise the value of piloting such approaches, we would encourage the …

Government response. The government accepted the recommendation, committing a further £5.1 million to continue the Mediation Voucher Scheme in 2022/23, providing approximately 10,400 vouchers, and is developing a wider reform programme to offer a range of out-of-court options.
Ministry of Justice
32 Recommendation Sixth report - Court capacity Accepted

Set out steps to reduce County Court delays and boost its overall operational capacity.

The County Court is vital to access to justice in England and Wales. The public relies on it to resolve disputes and vindicate their rights. As such, the significant increase in delays in certain cases in the County Court is concerning. It is imperative that the Government provides the resources …

Government response. The government accepted the recommendation, detailing plans to maximise sitting days, provide administrative and staffing support, continue the Reform programme, and highlighted a £324 million investment over three years to improve timeliness in civil and family courts and tribunals.
Ministry of Justice
33 Conclusion Sixth report - Court capacity Accepted

Enhancing court capacity requires addressing judicial, staff, digital, and physical elements concurrently.

To enhance the capacity of the civil and family courts, it is vital to address each of the core elements of court capacity: judicial, staff, digital and physical. As the Lord Chief Justice explained, digital and physical capacity have a significant bearing on the ability to recruit judges and expand …

Government response. The government accepted the underlying sentiment, detailing plans to maximise sitting days, ensure administrative and staffing support, continue the Reform programme, and highlighted a £324 million investment over three years to improve timeliness in civil and family courts and tribunals.
Ministry of Justice

Correspondence

5 letters
DateDirectionTitle
23 Jul 2021 Criminal law roundtable transcript 8 February 2021
4 Feb 2021 From cttee Letter to the Lord Chancellor, dated 3 February 2021, regarding the situation i…
24 Nov 2020 To cttee Letter from Sir Robert Neill MP, Chair, Justice Committee to Rt Hon Rishi Sunak…
24 Nov 2020 To cttee Letter from Sir Robert Neill MP, Chair, Justice Committee to Rt Hon Robert Buck…
8 Jul 2020 To cttee Letter from Rt Hon Robert Buckland QC MP, Lord Chancellor and Secretary of Stat…