Select committee: Work and Pensions Committee

Conclusion 26

Sixth Report - Children in poverty: Child Maintenance Service Published 27 Apr 2023 Paragraph 110 Addressed to Department for Work and Pensions
Conclusion (the committee's words)
We strongly support the Child Maintenance Service’s plans to move to having a named caseworker, initially for customers in abusive situations before eventually being rolled out to all customers. The experience of having to recount one’s story multiple times was a particular issue we heard about in our inquiry and the Department’s plans have the potential to improve customer service outcomes substantially. We would welcome data being provided to the Committee quarterly to demonstrate progress against assigning customers named caseworkers.

From: Work and Pensions Committee, Sixth Report - Children in poverty: Child Maintenance Service (HC 272), paragraph 110, 27 April 2023

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 6 July 2023.

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government welcomes the Committee's report and responds to each recommendation, agreeing with some aims and disagreeing with or declining others.

  • It agrees that effective enforcement should be a key priority, and says that if the Child Support (Enforcement) Bill receives royal assent, a simpler administrative liability order will "substantially speed up" moves to stronger enforcement.
  • It disagrees that the Financial Investigation Unit referral system is not functioning as it should, and does not agree that splitting Child Benefit between parents with shared care would be appropriate.
  • On Universal Credit, it says "there are no estimated timescales currently" for partial deductions for child maintenance, and "no plans currently" to alter the order of deductions.
  • It intends a "fundamental review" of the child maintenance calculation, including whether to include both parental incomes, and says it will consider moving rates into secondary legislation. Any changes would be explored "at the earliest opportunity" if the review indicates they are necessary.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error