Recommendations & Conclusions
6 items
2
Recommendation
Fourth Report - Pension stewardship and…
Rejected
The Minister for Pensions and Financial Inclusion told us that the Government as a whole is responsible for sharing best practice internationally on investment reporting. We recommend that, in order to increase the prominence and accountability of this important task, a single Minister should be responsible for leading this work. …
Read more
The Minister for Pensions and Financial Inclusion told us that the Government as a whole is responsible for sharing best practice internationally on investment reporting. We recommend that, in order to increase the prominence and accountability of this important task, a single Minister should be responsible for leading this work. (Paragraph 8) Reporting standards
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government rejects the recommendation for a single Minister to lead this work, stating that global best practice requires co-operation and leadership from a range of stakeholders. It highlights existing multi-departmental efforts, including a high-level Transition Plan Taskforce and the proposed SDR regime.
Read full response →
Department for Work and Pensions
9
Recommendation
Fourth Report - Pension stewardship and…
Rejected
The idea of “net zero alignment” does not have a single clear definition. Without a standardised definition, there is a risk that different pension schemes will interpret “net zero” in different ways. That will make it more difficult for savers to understand the approach their scheme is taking or to …
Read more
The idea of “net zero alignment” does not have a single clear definition. Without a standardised definition, there is a risk that different pension schemes will interpret “net zero” in different ways. That will make it more difficult for savers to understand the approach their scheme is taking or to compare schemes. We recommend that the Pensions Regulator define net zero alignment.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government rejects the recommendation for the Pensions Regulator to define a single net zero alignment, citing difficulties, and instead proposes requiring pension schemes to calculate and report one of three flexible portfolio alignment metrics.
Read full response →
Department for Work and Pensions
11
Recommendation
Fourth Report - Pension stewardship and…
Rejected
While larger schemes are setting net zero targets, it is likely that many smaller schemes will not have the resources to do this effectively without support and guidance. Ambiguity about whether net zero targets would put trustees at risk of breaching their fiduciary duty to act in the best interests …
Read more
While larger schemes are setting net zero targets, it is likely that many smaller schemes will not have the resources to do this effectively without support and guidance. Ambiguity about whether net zero targets would put trustees at risk of breaching their fiduciary duty to act in the best interests of their members is also a barrier for trustees. We do not believe that the fiduciary duty itself needs to change, but schemes do need more clarity. We recommend that the Pensions Regulator should establish a working group to develop guidance for schemes looking to set net zero targets.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government rejects the recommendation to establish a working group, stating that significant progress is already being made and that the Pensions Regulator's existing climate change strategy and engagement methods are sufficient for developing and adapting guidance for pension schemes on net zero targets.
Read full response →
Department for Work and Pensions
12
Recommendation
Fourth Report - Pension stewardship and…
Rejected
Defined contribution schemes used for automatic enrolment are required to have a default option into which the member is enrolled, unless they specify an alternative. We recommend that the Government consult on the case for mandating that these default options should align to UK Government climate goals.
Read more
Defined contribution schemes used for automatic enrolment are required to have a default option into which the member is enrolled, unless they specify an alternative. We recommend that the Government consult on the case for mandating that these default options should align to UK Government climate goals.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government expresses concern that mandating climate goal alignment might force divestment, hindering stewardship, and therefore rejects the recommendation, instead focusing on consulting on guidance to encourage effective stewardship.
Read full response →
Department for Work and Pensions
14
Recommendation
Fourth Report - Pension stewardship and…
Rejected
There are a limited number of suitable green assets in which pension schemes can invest. That means that there is a risk of a “green asset bubble” in the short term, as the market for these products develops. It is important that the Government continues to support the development of …
Read more
There are a limited number of suitable green assets in which pension schemes can invest. That means that there is a risk of a “green asset bubble” in the short term, as the market for these products develops. It is important that the Government continues to support the development of products, such as green gilts, to mitigate this risk.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government rejects the recommendation, stating it does not agree and that publishing information on direct investments (which was not the core of the recommendation) would not be practically feasible.
Read full response →
Department for Work and Pensions
17
Recommendation
Fourth Report - Pension stewardship and…
Rejected
Direct investment by pension schemes in green infrastructure and other illiquid assets has the potential to benefit savers and the environment. We recommend that the Department for Work and Pensions publishes information about levels of direct investment by pension schemes in its annual report.
Read more
Direct investment by pension schemes in green infrastructure and other illiquid assets has the potential to benefit savers and the environment. We recommend that the Department for Work and Pensions publishes information about levels of direct investment by pension schemes in its annual report.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government rejects the recommendation, stating it is not practically feasible to publish information on direct investments due to the complexity of pension scheme portfolios. It highlights existing regulations to drive assessment and disclosure of climate risk instead.
Read full response →
Department for Work and Pensions