Select Committee · Women and Equalities Committee

Equality and the UK asylum process

Status: Closed Opened: 27 Sep 2021 Closed: 6 Feb 2024 23 recommendations 13 conclusions 1 report

An inquiry to examine the fairness of the UK asylum process, looking at the experiences of people seeking asylum who have a range of protected characteristics (as defined in the UK’s Equality Act). Read the terms of reference to find out more about this inquiry .

Clear

Reports

1 report
Title HC No. Published Items Response
Fourth Report - Equality and the UK asylum process HC 93 27 Jun 2023 36 Responded

Recommendations & Conclusions

7 items
1 Conclusion Fourth Report - Equality and the UK asy… Not Addressed

Home Office asylum system reforms increase risks for vulnerable claimants with protected characteristics.

The asylum system is undergoing substantial reform, in part due to the Home Office’s inability to process the volume of asylum claims it receives effectively and expeditiously. The Government is now seeking to reduce the ability of people to claim asylum in the UK despite recent figures showing the majority …

Government response. The government does not directly address the committee's concerns about increasing risks for vulnerable groups under proposed asylum changes, instead reiterating its commitment to the Illegal Migration Act and asserting that any differential impact is proportionate to tackling illegal migration.
Government Equalities Office
4 Recommendation Fourth Report - Equality and the UK asy… Not Addressed

Review and publish an action plan for implementing gender-sensitive asylum interview guidance effectively.

The Home Office document, ‘Gender issues in the asylum claim’, includes very welcome guidance on gender sensitive asylum interview practice, including on meeting claimants’ requests for female interviewers, providing childcare where necessary and allowing female claimants to have a friend or other companion present to provide emotional or medical support. …

Government response. The government describes its existing processes for informing asylum claimants about gender-sensitive interview options and for attempting to meet requests. However, it does not commit to carrying out the recommended review of implementation or publishing an action plan, noting it …
Government Equalities Office
12 Conclusion Fourth Report - Equality and the UK asy… Not Addressed

Asylum initial decisions are too slow, often wrong, and subject to tribunal delays.

In order to fulfil the Prime Minister’s pledge to clear a substantial part of the backlog of asylum cases this year, the Home Office will need many more highly-trained decision-makers making initial decisions faster. Data on decision-making rates and appeal outcomes show initial decisions are far too slow and too …

Government response. The government's response describes existing specialised training modules for asylum decision-makers and past collaboration with experts, stating it will seek to do so in any future review. It does not address the committee's concerns about the need for more highly-trained …
Government Equalities Office
13 Conclusion Fourth Report - Equality and the UK asy… Not Addressed

Establish comprehensive training for asylum decision-makers and improve appeal action timeliness.

The Home Office must establish a new programme of training for Home Office decision- makers and presenting officers particularly on matters concerning gender, sexual orientation and gender identity-based asylum claims. Training should be delivered by independent expert stakeholders, drawing on lived experiences of refugees. The Home Office must also improve …

Government response. The government states that initial training for asylum decision-makers already includes specialised modules and that it has collaborated with experts previously. However, it does not commit to establishing a *new* training programme delivered by *independent expert stakeholders* or to improving …
Government Equalities Office
28 Recommendation Fourth Report - Equality and the UK asy… Not Addressed

Ensure foreign language legal advice information and improve mobile phone reception in detention centres.

We welcome the Government’s announcement that all Detained Duty Advice Scheme appointments in immigration detention, including Derwentside Immigration Removal Centre (IRC), will now be delivered face-to-face. However, the Government must address further potential barriers to accessing legal advice in Derwentside IRC. It must ensure that information in foreign languages about …

Government response. The government's response describes existing verbal advisories on legal representation provided during induction, with interpreters available, but it does not address the recommendation to display information about legal advice in foreign languages on posters or to take steps to improve …
Government Equalities Office
34 Recommendation Fourth Report - Equality and the UK asy… Not Addressed

Commission and publish independent review and equality impact assessment of the Afghan refugee resettlement approach.

Accommodation of Afghan refugees in bridging hotels for many months has been deeply problematic, with serious safeguarding issues for people with vulnerabilities arising from protected characteristics, including women and children enduring crowded conditions alongside single men. For many, integration and employment support has been entirely lacking. The lessons of the …

Government response. The government details the support, funding, and services provided to Afghan refugees, stating that resettlement schemes are continuously monitored internally. However, it does not commit to commissioning or publishing an independent review and equality impact assessment within six months, as …
Government Equalities Office
36 Recommendation Fourth Report - Equality and the UK asy… Not Addressed

Monitor and mitigate safeguarding concerns within Ukrainian schemes and conduct a comprehensive review.

We heard worrying evidence of safeguarding risks to vulnerable adults and children where UK sponsors and Ukrainians in the Homes for Ukraine scheme have self- matched via the internet and social media. We welcome safeguarding guidance to local authorities published earlier this year, but it is regrettable that it was …

Government response. The government details existing safeguarding measures within the Ukrainian schemes, including mandatory security and DBS checks, welfare visits by councils, and guidance for online matching. However, it does not commit to carrying out a specific review of safeguarding within three …
Government Equalities Office

Oral evidence sessions

6 sessions
Date Witnesses
25 Jan 2023 Dan Hobbs · Home Office, Mandy Ivemy · Home Office, The Rt Hon Robert Jenrick MP · Home Office View ↗
15 Jun 2022 Andy Hewett · Refugee Council, Esther Baleh, Jennifer Blair · Ukraine Advice Project UK, Zahra Shaheer View ↗
27 Apr 2022 Esther Muchena · Scottish Refugee Council, Ms Rivka Shaw · Greater Manchester Immigration Aid Unit (GMIAU), Rosalind Bragg · Maternity Action View ↗
23 Mar 2022 Annie . · VOICES Network, Kathryn Cronin · Garden Court Chambers, Ms Pip McKnight · Refugee Women Connect, Ms Priscilla Dudhia · Women for Refugee Women, Roxana . · VOICES Network View ↗
23 Feb 2022 Dr S Chelvan, Leila Zadeh · Rainbow Migration, Professor Nuno Ferreira · University of Sussex View ↗
26 Jan 2022 David Goodhart · Policy Exchange, Jonathan Thomas · Social Market Foundation, Ms Zoe Gardner · Joint Council on the Welfare of Immigrants, Rossella Pulvirenti · Manchester Metropolitan University View ↗

Correspondence

8 letters
DateDirectionTitle
19 Apr 2023 To cttee Letter from the Minister of State for Immigration relating to follow-up evidenc…
1 Feb 2023 To cttee Response from the Director of Detention Services on further questions relating …
25 Jan 2023 To cttee Letter from the Committee to Frances Hardy, Director of Detention Services, Imm…
18 Jan 2023 To cttee Letter from the Chair to Tom Pursglove on Equality and the UK Asylum Process
16 Jan 2023 To cttee Letter from the Minister of State for Immigration relating to the asylum inquiry
16 Jan 2023 From cttee Letter to the Head of Detention Progression and Returns Command relating to the…
16 Jan 2023 To cttee Letter from the Director of Detention Services relating to the Committee’s visi…
15 Jun 2022 Correspondence from EHRC regarding of a report into the experience and treatmen…