Select Committee · Women and Equalities Committee

Equality and the UK asylum process

Status: Closed Opened: 27 Sep 2021 Closed: 6 Feb 2024 23 recommendations 13 conclusions 1 report

An inquiry to examine the fairness of the UK asylum process, looking at the experiences of people seeking asylum who have a range of protected characteristics (as defined in the UK’s Equality Act). Read the terms of reference to find out more about this inquiry .

Clear

Reports

1 report
Title HC No. Published Items Response
Fourth Report - Equality and the UK asylum process HC 93 27 Jun 2023 36 Responded

Recommendations & Conclusions

7 items
3 Recommendation Fourth Report - Equality and the UK asy… Accepted

Establish a specialist team for women's asylum claims involving sexual and gender-based violence.

The Home Office’s heavy reliance on a single substantive asylum interview disadvantages women with histories of sexual and gender-based violence and abuse. These women will invariably be experiencing the effects of trauma and related mental health issues, with potential effects on memory and their ability to provide a cogent, chronological …

Government response. The government states that its existing “Gender issues in the asylum claim” policy already ensures interviews are responsive to trauma, allows breaks and subsequent interviews where needed, identifies vulnerable claimants, and permits companions in exceptional circumstances. They do not commit …
Government Equalities Office
8 Conclusion Fourth Report - Equality and the UK asy… Accepted

Biased interpreters negatively impact asylum claims, especially in SOGI and religious belief cases.

Biased or prejudiced interpreters can adversely affect a person’s asylum claim, particularly in cases where claims are based on sexual orientation or gender identity and religion or renunciation of religious belief. No interpreter contracted by the Home Office should be able to influence the determination of any claim, particularly where …

Government response. The government explains that interpreters adhere to a code of conduct setting out impartiality expectations, and while unable to mandate training, provides guidance to staff. It also notes redesigned training for asylum decision makers and assurance checks, which emphasize sensitive …
Government Equalities Office
19 Recommendation Fourth Report - Equality and the UK asy… Accepted

Conduct urgent review of asylum safeguarding and increase dedicated safe accommodation provision.

The Home Office should conduct an urgent review of safeguarding policies and practices across all asylum support contracts, to ensure the asylum support contracts safeguarding framework is being consistently and effectively implemented in all settings. It should publish its review and an action plan within three months. We further recommend …

Government response. The government states that the safety and wellbeing of all asylum seekers is of paramount importance and describes existing safeguarding measures, policies, and procedures.
Government Equalities Office
21 Recommendation Fourth Report - Equality and the UK asy… Accepted

Publish robust safeguarding policy for contingency accommodation, including needs-based risk assessments for vulnerable groups.

As part of the safeguarding review and action plan recommended above, the Home Office must publish a robust safeguarding policy in relation to the use of hotels and other facilities as contingency accommodation. This should include a requirement for a needs-based risk assessment to be carried out before any women, …

Government response. The government states that the safety and wellbeing of all asylum seekers is of paramount importance and describes existing safeguarding measures, policies, and procedures.
Government Equalities Office
29 Conclusion Fourth Report - Equality and the UK asy… Accepted

Suspend notices of intent for Rwanda removals and review initial screening procedures thoroughly.

We are deeply concerned that the Home Office’s case-by-case risk assessments prior to issuing notices of intent to remove potentially inadmissible asylum claimants to Rwanda appear to be inadequate. There is evidence that a significant number of vulnerable people, to whom the removal process would very likely be harmful, have …

Government response. The government defends its existing Notice of Intent process and Adults at Risk policy, stating that these mechanisms already allow individuals to raise vulnerabilities and ensure regular reviews, without committing to suspending notices or reviewing initial screening procedures as recommended.
Government Equalities Office
32 Recommendation Fourth Report - Equality and the UK asy… Accepted

Replicate the successful VPRS approach within the UK Resettlement Scheme and in future migrant crises.

The Vulnerable Persons Resettlement Scheme (VPRS) provides a recent good practice example of an effective resettlement scheme, which was successfully scaled up in response to a migrant crisis. The scheme was adequately and predictably funded with a clear target for the number of refugees to be resettled, providing local authorities …

Government response. The government states that the UK Resettlement Scheme (UKRS) is a direct successor to the VPRS, building on its success with a flexible approach and a core tariff for local authorities based on the VPRS integration package. It also highlights …
Government Equalities Office
35 Recommendation Fourth Report - Equality and the UK asy… Accepted

Address online visa barriers for Ukrainian pathways and expand disabled access support across the UK.

The online visa application processes for the Ukrainian humanitarian protection pathways are a barrier to access for several groups of people with protected characteristics. These include older and younger people, Roma and other ethnic minority groups, and disabled people. We appreciate that the schemes were designed at pace and that …

Government response. The government details existing measures to address online visa application barriers, such as allowing sponsors to fill forms, providing translations, offering evidential flexibility, and a helpline. For disabled people, it notes councils are advised to check accommodation suitability and conduct …
Government Equalities Office

Oral evidence sessions

6 sessions
Date Witnesses
25 Jan 2023 Dan Hobbs · Home Office, Mandy Ivemy · Home Office, The Rt Hon Robert Jenrick MP · Home Office View ↗
15 Jun 2022 Andy Hewett · Refugee Council, Esther Baleh, Jennifer Blair · Ukraine Advice Project UK, Zahra Shaheer View ↗
27 Apr 2022 Esther Muchena · Scottish Refugee Council, Ms Rivka Shaw · Greater Manchester Immigration Aid Unit (GMIAU), Rosalind Bragg · Maternity Action View ↗
23 Mar 2022 Annie . · VOICES Network, Kathryn Cronin · Garden Court Chambers, Ms Pip McKnight · Refugee Women Connect, Ms Priscilla Dudhia · Women for Refugee Women, Roxana . · VOICES Network View ↗
23 Feb 2022 Dr S Chelvan, Leila Zadeh · Rainbow Migration, Professor Nuno Ferreira · University of Sussex View ↗
26 Jan 2022 David Goodhart · Policy Exchange, Jonathan Thomas · Social Market Foundation, Ms Zoe Gardner · Joint Council on the Welfare of Immigrants, Rossella Pulvirenti · Manchester Metropolitan University View ↗

Correspondence

8 letters
DateDirectionTitle
19 Apr 2023 To cttee Letter from the Minister of State for Immigration relating to follow-up evidenc…
1 Feb 2023 To cttee Response from the Director of Detention Services on further questions relating …
25 Jan 2023 To cttee Letter from the Committee to Frances Hardy, Director of Detention Services, Imm…
18 Jan 2023 To cttee Letter from the Chair to Tom Pursglove on Equality and the UK Asylum Process
16 Jan 2023 To cttee Letter from the Minister of State for Immigration relating to the asylum inquiry
16 Jan 2023 From cttee Letter to the Head of Detention Progression and Returns Command relating to the…
16 Jan 2023 To cttee Letter from the Director of Detention Services relating to the Committee’s visi…
15 Jun 2022 Correspondence from EHRC regarding of a report into the experience and treatmen…