Select committee: Transport Committee

Conclusion 6

7th Report - Rail investment pipelines: ending boom and bust Published 10 Feb 2026 Addressed to Department for Transport
Conclusion (the committee's words)
The five-year funding settlement provided through the Control Period process, which is set to be continued through Funding Period Reviews, gives a reasonable degree of certainty and visibility of spend on operations, maintenance and renewals. Nonetheless, the mechanism could be improved. Spending profiles for particular categories of work can be uneven and delays to contracting at the start of a new Control Period can cause damaging uncertainty. It is apparent that industry experienced significant disruption to volumes of work and continuity of contracting at the beginning of Control Period 7. (Conclusion, Paragraph 58)

From: Transport Committee, 7th Report - Rail investment pipelines: ending boom and bust (HC 575), 10 February 2026

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 1 May 2026 (deadline 10 April 2026).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The Government shares the Committee's ambition to reduce unnecessary volatility in rail investment, but does not accept that rail funding has been characterised by systemic "boom and bust" and partially agrees with or departs from several recommendations.

  • On the independent review of Control Period 7, the Government partially agrees: it agrees the experience should be examined, but does not agree this "requires commissioning and publishing an independent review" before GBR is established, saying the work can use existing assurance and regulatory processes.
  • On rolling stock, the Government agrees on the need for an aligned strategy and says the forthcoming Rolling Stock and Infrastructure Strategy, rather than the Long Term Rail Strategy, will set out a vision for simplifying the national fleet over time.
  • On pipeline publication, the Government does not consider annual re-publication of a static RNEP document to be the most effective mechanism, and instead points to the National Infrastructure Pipeline, the Enhancements Delivery Plan and milestone announcements. It intends to establish a "potential pipeline" that will not be a funding commitment.
  • On the Long Term Rail Strategy, the Government agrees on a statutory 30-year strategy and commits to publishing a discussion document alongside Bill passage through the House of Lords, and to laying a Written Ministerial Statement and a copy of the strategy in the library of both Houses.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error