Source · Select Committees · Science, Innovation and Technology Committee

Sixth Report - Reproducibility and Research Integrity

Science, Innovation and Technology Committee HC 101 Published 10 May 2023
Report Status
Government responded
Conclusions & Recommendations
28 items (21 recs)
Government Response
AI assessment · 28 of 28 classified
Accepted 4
Accepted in Part 11
Acknowledged 5
Deferred 4
Not Addressed 1
Rejected 3
Filter by: Clear

Recommendations

2 results
7 Rejected
Para 60

Develop a co-produced framework for responding to research misconduct cases effectively

Recommendation
The UK’s lacks an established infrastructure for responding to research misconduct cases. The UK Government should lead on a co-produced framework with the UK Reproducibility Network, UKRIO and UK CORI, which sets out the roles and expectations for key actors … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government rejects the recommendation to lead on a co-produced framework for responding to research misconduct cases, asserting that government should not investigate misconduct and that primary responsibility lies with research organisations.
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
View Details →
8 Rejected
Para 61

Assess benefits of establishing an additional body to investigate research malpractice

Recommendation
The UK Government should assess the benefits that an additional body, set up to investigate malpractice, could bring to the UK’s research integrity governance architecture.
Government Response Summary
The government rejects the recommendation to assess creating a new body for investigating research malpractice, stating it is not the government's role and that primary responsibility lies with research organisations.
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
View Details →

Conclusions (1)

Observations and findings
16 Conclusion Rejected
Uncertainty in the academic job market, especially at earlier career stages, acts as a strong additional disincentive against the prioritisation of reproducibility by researchers. Research funders, including UKRI, should work to impose a three-year minimum contract for post-doctoral researchers in universities. (Paragraph 89) Solving reproducibility challenges which emerge in the …
Government Response Summary
The government explicitly does not accept the recommendation to impose a three-year minimum contract for post-doctoral researchers in universities.
View Details →