Source · Select Committees · Home Affairs Committee
Recommendation 10
10
Paragraph: 41
Dismissing strict border measures as “draconian” on 3 February was erroneous, as it was their...
Conclusion
Dismissing strict border measures as “draconian” on 3 February was erroneous, as it was their strength that could have made a significant contribution and potentially mitigated the scale of domestic restrictions that were later needed. SAGE papers suggest that prioritising delay of spread rather than suppression of cases was influenced by the conclusion that the virus ought to be treated similarly to pandemic influenza, but this has been retrospectively proved wrong.
Paragraph Reference:
41
Government Response
A response document is linked to this report, dated 13 November 2020. Response attribution to this conclusion has not been verified. Read the response document ↗