Source · Select Committees · Home Affairs Committee

Recommendation 4

4 Rejected Paragraph: 33

The incremental introduction of international travel measures during the period from late January to early...

Conclusion
The incremental introduction of international travel measures during the period from late January to early March corresponded to the practice in other countries during this time and reflects the great uncertainty with which governments were grappling. It was right to adjust and extend self-isolation provisions as the virus became established, starting with Wuhan and China, but also extending provisions to cover places like Italy as the virus spread. Many other European countries were beginning to be affected by coronavirus in the same way, and many took a similar incremental approach as the UK. Evidence shows that the number of cases of direct transmission from China into the UK was extremely small, and that the number of cases from Italy started to fall after 25 February when border measures were 74 Home Office preparedness for COOVDD19 (coronavirus): management of the borders introduced. However, it is impossible to distinguish between the impact of border measures and other factors such as lockdowns in Wuhan and Italy or falling overall passenger numbers which may have had a much bigger effect.
Government response summary AI-generated
The government rejects the committee's assertions, defending its past decisions regarding border measures in March. They state that isolation guidance was superseded, decisions were science-led, and that imported cases made a marginal impact when domestic transmission was high, while maintaining open borders was crucial.
Paragraph Reference: 33
Government Response

The government responded to this report on 13 November 2020. No passage in that response could be matched to this conclusion. Read the response document ↗