Source · Select Committees · Home Affairs Committee
Recommendation 38
38
Deferred
Paragraph: 122
Reissuing the claim form guidance in plain English is a welcome first step in improving...
Conclusion
Reissuing the claim form guidance in plain English is a welcome first step in improving the application process, but the Department must continually be aware that the demands of this form may still represent a significant challenge to this cohort, many of whom may be vulnerable. As we were told by Garden Court Chambers, “plain language does not always equate to ease of access”. The Home Office must also address the adequacy of support available to claimants in completing their application.
Government Response Summary
The government's response detailed its policy on how severe criminal behaviour affects compensation eligibility and the reduction or denial of 'Impact on Life' awards, entirely unrelated to the recommendation about application support.
Paragraph Reference:
122
Government Response
Deferred
HM Government
Deferred
In most instances, criminality will not affect an individual’s compensation. However, we have a duty to consider whether it is appropriate to make payment from the public purse to people whose severe criminal behaviour has negatively impacted the lives of victims and wider society. Where individuals have received sentences of imprisonment of four years or longer for offences such as murder, rape or sex/sexual offences with a minor, any award for Impact on Life will likely be declined. Where this is the case, we will consider whether there are circumstances since the individual’s release from prison which mean a reduction in their award for Impact on Life may be more appropriate, rather than declining it, e.g., community or charity work. A precedent for the modification of compensation where an individual has unspent criminal convictions exists in the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority (CICA). All decisions to withhold or reduce compensation are signed off by Ministers.