Source · Select Committees · Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee

2nd Report – Review of the 2024 general election

Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee HC 487 Published 22 July 2025
Report Status
Government responded
Conclusions & Recommendations
69 items (20 recs)
Government Response
AI assessment · 69 of 69 classified
Accepted 13
Accepted in Part 8
Acknowledged 12
Deferred 9
Not Addressed 9
Rejected 18
Filter by: Clear

Recommendations

5 results
50 Not Addressed

Increase voter awareness of available support and equipment through clearer communications to voters.

Recommendation
We recommend that more is done to make voters aware that additional support and equipment may be requested. This should be done through clearer advice in communications to voters. (Recommendation, Paragraph 129) 71
Government Response Summary
The government discusses its Accessibility of Elections Working Group and its intention to investigate how existing data might be used, but this response does not address the recommendation to improve voter awareness of available support and equipment.
View Details →
54 Not Addressed

Establish clear criteria for assessing voter ID effectiveness and mitigate negative turnout impacts.

Recommendation
The Government should set out clear criteria for judging the effectiveness of the voter ID policy. This statement should include criteria for assessing the acceptability of any impact of the policy on turnout. A detailed assessment of the general impact … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government defends its voter ID policy and cites existing research from the Electoral Commission and IFF Research. While it announces that UK-issued bank cards will be accepted as voter ID to increase accessibility, it does not commit to setting clear criteria for judging policy effectiveness or for detailed post-election reviews of turnout impacts.
View Details →
55 Not Addressed

Routinely collect election data to properly evaluate voter ID effectiveness and usage patterns.

Recommendation
Our assessment is that the longer voter ID prevails the more it will become accepted, reducing, though not removing, the prevention and discouragement effect. It is unfortunate that data was not regularly collected at polls in Northern Ireland, in particular … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government's response focuses on defending its voter ID policy, announcing the acceptance of bank cards, and committing to create a digital Voter Authority Certificate and accept digital forms of existing photo ID. It does not, however, commit to considering or implementing the routine collection of specific data points to evaluate voter ID effectiveness.
View Details →
59 Not Addressed

Introduce a voter vouching system for those lacking photo ID on election day

Recommendation
Alternatively, the Government should consider the Electoral Commission’s recommendation to introduce a vouching system, which would provide an emergency system for people who do not have, or find they have lost, an acceptable form of ID on the day of … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government's response does not address the committee's recommendation to consider introducing a vouching system for emergency voter identification.
View Details →
66 Not Addressed

Ofcom and Electoral Commission must set timescale for tackling online electoral abuse

Recommendation
We recommend that Ofcom in coordination with the Electoral Commission set out the timescale for setting up arrangements to address online abuse and intimidation at elections. (Recommendation, Paragraph 173) 74
Government Response Summary
The government's response details the implementation of the Online Safety Act (OSA) and its provisions, including commencement dates for certain offenses and duties, but does not commit to Ofcom and the Electoral Commission setting out a joint timescale for addressing online abuse and intimidation at elections.
View Details →

Conclusions (4)

Observations and findings
17 Conclusion Not Addressed
Elections have become dependent on external suppliers over which the Government have little control. This creates points of weakness and even potential failure in our elections system. (Conclusion, Paragraph 71)
Government Response Summary
The government's response does not directly address the committee's conclusion regarding the dependency of elections on external suppliers and the vulnerabilities this creates. It reiterates that planning is the responsibility of Returning Officers and the Electoral Commission, and rejects the production of an annual readiness report.
View Details →
21 Conclusion Not Addressed
The timing of the election placed extra pressure on the administration of the election, and placed stress on the thin supplier market. It also meant certain areas of the UK, such as Scotland and Northern Ireland, were placed at an administrative disadvantage. While we accept that the timing of the …
Government Response Summary
The government's response does not directly address the committee's conclusion about the administrative pressures and disadvantages caused by the timing of the general election.
View Details →
37 Conclusion Not Addressed
We appreciate the Royal Mail’s assurances that over 99% of all election mail was delivered on time. However, we are concerned that despite this a number of candidates felt their messaging was not delivered when they expected. To ease concerns for candidates, timelines for delivery of different materials should be …
Government Response Summary
The government outlines changes to improve resilience in the postal and proxy voting system, but does not specifically commit to making timelines for delivery of different election materials clear and tight. It rejects next-day delivery for poll cards and rolling ballot pack printing as impractical or too costly.
View Details →
46 Conclusion Not Addressed
While these and other options are being considered, we agree with the Electoral Commission that, as an interim measure, all overseas voters that are registered should automatically receive a postal vote, meaning they would have to actively apply to vote by another means, i.e. in person or by proxy. (Recommendation, …
Government Response Summary
The government states that overseas electors continue to have options for voting by proxy, post, or in person, and that proxy voters can acquire postal votes. However, it does not address the specific recommendation to automatically send postal votes to all registered overseas voters as an interim measure.
View Details →