Select committee: Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee
Conclusion 14
Eighth Report - Government transparency and accountability during Covid 19: The data underpinning decisions
Published 15 Mar 2021
Paragraph 98
Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee Data Transparency and Accountability: Covid 19 All items in this report Report on parliament.uk ↗ Inquiry on parliament.uk ↗
Conclusion (the committee's words)
The Committee was very disappointed that when the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster declined to appear before the Committee on 4th February, Ministers sent in his place were poorly briefed and unable to answer the Committee’s questions. The ability of Select Committees to hold Ministers to account for decisions is a vital part of the democratic process. This is particularly true at a time when the country is facing the toughest possible restrictions on our freedoms, and when (as we have previously reported on) detailed scrutiny of the Government’s decisions has not always been possible in the timeframes required. The Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster’s refusal to attend this Committee and account for decisions made by the taskforce he chairs is contemptuous of Parliament.
From: Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee, Eighth Report - Government transparency and accountability during Covid 19: The data underpinning decisions (HC 803), paragraph 98, 15 March 2021
Government response
The government responded to the whole report on 25 May 2021 (deadline 15 May 2021).
Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.The government responds point by point, agreeing with some aims but stating that it "does not agree that a change is necessary to the Ministerial Code" and, on several recommendations, referring to earlier letters or existing practice.
- On publishing data behind quoted statistics, it is "committed to transparency" and "will endeavour to publish all statistics and underlying data when referenced publicly", in line with the Code of Practice for Official Statistics.
- It disagrees with strengthening the Ministerial Code, stating that there will be occasions where it is in the public interest to use "emerging information", and it points to the existing wording that Ministers should be "mindful" of good practice.
- On the health data review, it agrees cross-organisational working matters and will "consider the merits of conducting a broader review" once the draft Data Strategy and other work are complete. It has agreed that the Office for Statistics Regulation will carry out a lessons learned exercise "once the immediate challenges of pandemic response have passed".
- It states that the Prime Minister confirmed on 12 May a statutory public inquiry that "will begin its work in spring 2022".