Source · Select Committees · International Development Committee

Recommendation 15

15

UK lacks consistency condemning IHL breaches, especially when protecting allies.

Conclusion
We welcome the times that the Government has made a stand on the likely breaches of IHL that have reduced access of populations to aid and/or have failed to protect those delivering aid. We also welcome the more general calls for the protection of aid workers. However, the lack of consistency across conflict types and geographies, arguably depending on the participants is startling, greater care needs to be taken to ensure that the UK’s actions and rhetoric around suspected breaches of IHL cannot be construed as being anything other than even handed—protecting allies 50 at the expense of unconditional support for IHL is unacceptable. Such actions would set a poor example to other states and risk undermining the universality of law designed to protect us all. (Conclusion, Paragraph 38)
Government Response

A response document is linked to this report, dated 5 September 2025. Response attribution to this conclusion has not been verified. Read the response document ↗