Source · Select Committees · International Development Committee
Recommendation 15
15
Acknowledged
UK lacks consistency condemning IHL breaches, especially when protecting allies.
Conclusion
We welcome the times that the Government has made a stand on the likely breaches of IHL that have reduced access of populations to aid and/or have failed to protect those delivering aid. We also welcome the more general calls for the protection of aid workers. However, the lack of consistency across conflict types and geographies, arguably depending on the participants is startling, greater care needs to be taken to ensure that the UK’s actions and rhetoric around suspected breaches of IHL cannot be construed as being anything other than even handed—protecting allies 50 at the expense of unconditional support for IHL is unacceptable. Such actions would set a poor example to other states and risk undermining the universality of law designed to protect us all. (Conclusion, Paragraph 38)
Government response summary AI-generated
The government partially agrees, stating it consistently calls on all parties to comply with IHL without differentiation and engages with partners to address reported violations. It clarifies that it cannot provide a running commentary on possible breaches due to lack of detailed information.
Government Response
The government responded to this report on 5 September 2025. No passage in that response could be matched to this conclusion. Read the response document ↗