Recommendation 75

We heard that loss and damage159 remained underserved in international climate action—even more so than climate adaptation.160 Contributors called for new and additional funding for loss and damage and for a more ambitious approach to addressing loss and damage.161 Bond and CAN-UK told us that: The UK has not yet shown the leadership necessary on loss and damage to stand up for those suffering the worst impacts of climate change.162 They added that loss and damage was being subordinated to adaptation despite having an entire Article dedicated to it in the Paris Agreement.163 In their words: The theme of Adaptation and Resilience ignores loss and damage entirely and uses instead the term “resilience” as a blanket term, ostensibly to include loss and damage without explicit recognition.164