Source · Select Committees · International Development Committee

Recommendation 29

29

We heard that capacity-building at a local level was hampered by weak digital infrastructure,51 the...

Conclusion
We heard that capacity-building at a local level was hampered by weak digital infrastructure,51 the complex design of programmes52 and a lack of sufficient adjustment of projects to the needs of local communities.53 Furthermore, we were told that projects implemented in the Global South might appear to be running for longer in individual LDCs than they are. Julius Ng’oma gave us the example of a project funded by the Scottish Government, which had already been running for two years by the start of its implementation in Malawi.54 In his words: On paper, the project would appear to be for five years. Because it has some international attachments to it with international advocacy […], we tend to have a short-term project of three years. Two years have already been done, maybe in the UK or somewhere else. Then they want to get experience from Malawi […]. That has always been a problem.55
Government Response

A response document is linked to this report, dated 14 January 2022. Response attribution to this conclusion has not been verified. Read the response document ↗