Select committee: International Development Committee

Conclusion 17

Ninth Report - Investment for development: The UK’s strategy towards Development Finance Institutions Published 15 Sep 2023 Paragraph 94 Addressed to Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
Conclusion (the committee's words)
While the Abraaj example suggests that BII’s internal control flagged suspected fraudulent activity, in light of other reports we are forced to conclude that BII’s internal control failed to identify and prevent some investments that appear to have harmed society and the environment in low-income countries. In those cases, BII was slow to investigate and to act in response to alleged wrongdoing by investee companies.

From: International Development Committee, Ninth Report - Investment for development: The UK’s strategy towards Development Finance Institutions (HC 884), paragraph 94, 15 September 2023

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 7 December 2023 (deadline 15 November 2023).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The Government states that it "accepts or partially accepts all recommendations" on British International Investment (BII) and will work with BII to implement relevant reforms, including in negotiations for the 2027 to 2031 strategy.

  • On governance, it "partially accepts" Recommendation 1 but "does not agree" that a government official taking a non-voting seat on BII's Board would enhance governance, citing risks such as "blurring lines of responsibility".
  • On the British Investment Partnerships strategy (Recommendation 6), it accepts, but notes that consultation "will take time" and says it "does feel able to commit to publishing by summer 2024".
  • On targets for BII, it says it is "not appropriate" to introduce multiple additional SMART targets in this strategy period, but the FCDO "will also review its SMART targets for BII as part of the next strategy period from 2027".
  • On auditing and annual impact assessments, it believes a full rolling audit "would be disproportionate" but says Ministers "will review in 2024 whether additional spot checks" by external experts "are required".

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error