Select committee: International Development Committee

Women, peace and security

Closed Opened 7 Mar 2025 Closed 10 Jun 2026 12 recommendations 11 conclusions
Inquiry scope (the committee's words)
The International Development Committee is launching a new inquiry into how the UK Government is involving the needs and voices of women in its development efforts. The cross-party committee of MPs will explore the Women, Peace and Security (WPS) agenda, adopted by the United Nations, considering how this agenda is being incorporated into UK aid programmes, amid plans for the UK’s aid budget to be cut to 0.3% of GNI by 2027. Women and girls are disproportionately vulnerable to conflict, accounting for more than 95% of all UN-verified cases of conflict-related sexual violence in 2023. Today 600 million women, 15% of the world’s female population, live within 50 kilometres of a conflict zone. The Committee’s inquiry will explore how much progress the UK has made in delivering its priorities for women and girls and whether its commitments have translated into substantive outcomes. It will also consider how it can ensure that women’s voices help to shape the policies that affect them. The inquiry comes out of the Committee’s ‘In Development’ programme, which asked development experts to submit ideas for inquiries on the key issues shaping the sector. Join the conversation on X using @CommonsIDC

Where it stands

The inquiry is closed, opened 7 March 2025.

The committee has published 1 report, most recently 10th Report - Peace under pressure: Protecting Women, Peace and Security on 23 March 2026.

The government's response

Published 10 June 2026. The deadline was 23 May 2026.

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government's response is largely "Partially Agree" across the Committee's recommendations, restating its commitment to Women, Peace and Security while disagreeing with Recommendation 29 and agreeing only with Recommendation 86.

  • On the Committee's request to explain why no dedicated Women, Peace and Security session was convened during the February 2026 Security Council Presidency (Recommendation 29), the government disagrees. It says inviting women to brief country-specific meetings "has proven more meaningful and impactful than holding generic discussions on WPS".
  • On convening a dedicated session in a future Presidency (Recommendation 30), the government partially agrees. It says it "may decide that a dedicated WPS meeting is the best way to deliver this in a future Presidency but would not want to prejudge that at this stage".
  • On monitoring (Recommendation 86), the government agrees. It says it is "reviewing the current monitoring and evaluation mechanism" as part of the 2026 National Action Plan refresh.
  • On annual reporting to Parliament (Recommendation 96), the government partially agrees. It "will consider introducing annual reporting", notes that the plan commits to a biennial written report, and says the updated governance structure will be published in the 2026 refresh.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error

Recommendations and conclusions

All 23 recommendations and conclusions

Reports

All reports

Evidence

  • 3 oral evidence sessionsLatest 16 December 2025
  • 12 witnesses
All evidence

Recent activity

Recommendations and conclusions 23 shown

Conclusion 1

Conclusion · 10th Report - Peace under pressure: Protecting Women, Peace and Security · Addressed to Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office

Concluded (the committee's words)
The future of the Women, Peace and Security agenda hangs in the balance. The agenda is more critical than ever against the backdrop of rising conflicts, a global anti–gender movement and a reported backsliding on the rights of women and girls. The UK is a penholder for Women, Peace and Security at the United Nations Security Council and has the opportunity to convene dedicated sessions to deliver actions for the agenda. However, so far, the Government is at risk of inflicting damage to its reputation as a Women, Peace and Security penholder and convenor. Further still, it appears that the Government is standing idly by whilst hard–won gains in global gender equality are lost. (Conclusion, Paragraph 27)

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 2

Recommendation · 10th Report - Peace under pressure: Protecting Women, Peace and Security · Addressed to Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office

Recommended (the committee's words)
Gender equality should not become a footnote in UK diplomacy. The UK must use its clout on the international stage to strengthen the implementation of the Women, Peace and Security agenda. This means using the tools it has at its disposal. The UK should be seen to advocate for Women, Peace and Security in multilateral forums, holding the line on gender–sensitive language in resolutions, promoting strong Women, Peace and Security positions in United Nations Security Council work and prioritising the deliverability of commitments into actions. (Recommendation, Paragraph 28)

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 3

Recommendation · 10th Report - Peace under pressure: Protecting Women, Peace and Security · Addressed to Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office

Recommended (the committee's words)
The Government should explain why it did not convene a single dedicated session on Women, Peace and Security during its time as President of the United Nations Security Council in February 2026. The Government should set out in its response to this report what specific actions on Women, Peace and Security the UK has achieved in country–specific sessions in the last year. (Recommendation, Paragraph 29)

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 4

Recommendation · 10th Report - Peace under pressure: Protecting Women, Peace and Security · Addressed to Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office

Recommended (the committee's words)
The future of Women, Peace and Security hangs in the balance and must be addressed in its entirety rather than solely through country specific work. The UK should convene a dedicated session on Women, Peace and Security the next time it is President of the United Nations Security Council. (Recommendation, Paragraph 30) 33

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 5

Conclusion · 10th Report - Peace under pressure: Protecting Women, Peace and Security · Addressed to Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office

Concluded (the committee's words)
The Government’s commitment to implementing the Women, Peace and Security agenda, through its objectives in the National Action Plan, appears to be waning. The limited attention given to prevention throughout the National Action Plan, despite the benefits for peace, is concerning. The meaningful participation of women and other marginalised groups is essential for sustainable peace and conflict resolution. However, globally and domestically, women’s meaningful participation is declining. Ultimately, the translation of the commitments in the National Action Plan into practice has remained limited. Significant commitments, matched by action, will need to be made in the refresh objectives relating to prevention and participation are to be realised. (Conclusion, Paragraph 44)

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 6

Recommendation · 10th Report - Peace under pressure: Protecting Women, Peace and Security · Addressed to Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office

Recommended (the committee's words)
The Government need not re–shape its approach to Women, Peace and Security beyond the existing four pillars and five strategic objectives. Considering the increasing number of global conflicts and the integral role women play in peace, the National Action Plan refresh must prioritise meaningful participation and the contribution of women and marginalised groups in conflict prevention and related processes. (Recommendation, Paragraph 45)

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 7

Recommendation · 10th Report - Peace under pressure: Protecting Women, Peace and Security · Addressed to Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office

Recommended (the committee's words)
The UK should take a more active role in peace processes and make certain that women can meaningfully participate. This includes working with organisations and non–governmental organisations to embed accountability for breaches of Women, Peace and Security efforts. The Government should prioritise gender equality and women’s rights in conflict prevention, conflict resolution and peacebuilding processes. (Recommendation, Paragraph 46)

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 8

Conclusion · 10th Report - Peace under pressure: Protecting Women, Peace and Security · Addressed to Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office

Concluded (the committee's words)
The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office’s development and gender experts play an essential part in delivering the participation and prevention objectives in the National Action Plan. The Government cannot expect to deliver on these commitments without this expertise. Considering the number of growing number of conflicts around the world, losing this expertise would be damaging to the future of gender equality and peace. (Conclusion, Paragraph 47)

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 9

Recommendation · 10th Report - Peace under pressure: Protecting Women, Peace and Security · Addressed to Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office

Recommended (the committee's words)
The Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office must not lose its development or gender expertise. The Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office should commit to maintain development experts working on Women, Peace and Security with connections to local organisations and communities around the world. The Government must not cut gender advisor roles. The Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office must provide gender advisors to support organisations like GAPS with their work in–country. In its response, the Government should set out how it plans to achieve this. By doing so, the Foreign Commonwealth and 34 Development Office should make sure that the delivery of the new National Action Plan does not lose its gendered development focus and expertise. (Recommendation, Paragraph 48) Funding & Resourcing

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 10

Conclusion · 10th Report - Peace under pressure: Protecting Women, Peace and Security · Addressed to Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office

Concluded (the committee's words)
There is a lack of transparency surrounding the UK’s Women, Peace and Security spending, including how much Official Development Assistance is directed towards Women’s Rights Organisations, making it difficult for civil society organisations and other actors to track and assess progress on Women, Peace and Security. (Conclusion, Paragraph 60)

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 11

Recommendation · 10th Report - Peace under pressure: Protecting Women, Peace and Security · Addressed to Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office

Recommended (the committee's words)
As part of its National Action Plan refresh, the Government should set out how Women, Peace and Security objectives will be fully resourced and prioritised in the context of Official Development Assistance cuts, and how associated funding will be strategically distributed. The Government should ringfence multi–year funding for Women, Peace and Security programming, plans for which should also be published and shared with our Committee. (Recommendation, Paragraph 61)

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 12

Conclusion · 10th Report - Peace under pressure: Protecting Women, Peace and Security · Addressed to Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office

Concluded (the committee's words)
The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office has assured us it remains committed to the Women, Peace and Security agenda despite staffing cuts. However, it has had difficulty in upholding its commitments in the National Action Plan with current resourcing. It is unclear how a smaller organisation with fewer resources and reduced capacity will be better able to deliver on commitments. (Conclusion, Paragraph 63)

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 13

Conclusion · 10th Report - Peace under pressure: Protecting Women, Peace and Security · Addressed to Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office

Concluded (the committee's words)
The Government has not learned lessons from the first round of aid cuts and continues to enact policy changes that are devastating to the realities and futures of women, girls and marginalised groups. New sentence here: We welcome the Government’s commitment to ensure women and girls are a priority in UK foreign policy. The announced gender mainstreaming approach to improve their rights in foreign and development policy levers is concerning in the context of staff cuts and a loss of departmental expertise. Inadequate funding and mainstreaming may compromise delivery of the National Action Plan, as well as the broader Women, Peace, and Security agenda. (Conclusion, Paragraph 68)

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 14

Conclusion · 10th Report - Peace under pressure: Protecting Women, Peace and Security · Addressed to Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office

Concluded (the committee's words)
The commitments in the current National Action Plan lack dedicated funding, meaning that commitments are not resourced and their implementation is largely dependent on political will. (Conclusion, Paragraph 69)

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 15

Recommendation · 10th Report - Peace under pressure: Protecting Women, Peace and Security · Addressed to Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office

Recommended (the committee's words)
To guarantee the sustainability of Women, Peace and Security, a stable, ringfenced budget focused on flexible multi–year funding would protect against global socio–political changes and pressures. It would also allow 35 Women’s Rights Organisations and other partners to strategically plan and act both proactively and reactively to crises. Without this, the UK’s status as leader is left in a fragile state. We are concerned that mainstreaming is becoming the administrative lexicon for the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office dropping their focus on an issue. (Recommendation, Paragraph 70)

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 16

Recommendation · 10th Report - Peace under pressure: Protecting Women, Peace and Security · Addressed to Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office

Recommended (the committee's words)
In response to this report, the Department should provide details to the Committee on existing mechanisms for coordinating meaningfully between Government Departments, or how it intends to establish systematic coordination. The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office should report findings back to the Committee within six months of this report’s publication. (Recommendation, Paragraph 71) Monitoring and Evaluation

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 17

Conclusion · 10th Report - Peace under pressure: Protecting Women, Peace and Security · Addressed to Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office

Concluded (the committee's words)
The lack of an operational Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning framework is not a technical issue but a practical barrier to accountability, oversight, and outcome–focused programming. Current reporting risks being activity– driven rather than impact–driven, undermining efforts to improve the lives of women and girls in conflict–affected contexts. Despite commitments in the National Action Plan, there is no integrated cross–government system for capturing and aggregating data on Women, Peace and Security activity, expenditure or impact, nor a consistently applied set of Women, Peace and Security–specific indicators. The absence of baseline data and an operational Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning framework at the midpoint of the National Action Plan cycle limits the ability of the Government and Parliament to assess whether interventions are delivering measurable improvements. In the context of Official Development Assistance cuts and reductions in staff and resourcing, this also represents poor value for money, as resources are not systematically tracked or assessed. (Conclusion, Paragraph 85)

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 18

Recommendation · 10th Report - Peace under pressure: Protecting Women, Peace and Security · Addressed to Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office

Recommended (the committee's words)
As part of the Spring 2026 refresh of the National Action Plan, the Government must establish and publish a cross–government monitoring framework for Women, Peace and Security, including a clear and consistently applied set of Women, Peace and Security–specific indicators capable of assessing both outputs and impact. (Recommendation, Paragraph 86)

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 19

Recommendation · 10th Report - Peace under pressure: Protecting Women, Peace and Security · Addressed to Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office

Recommended (the committee's words)
The Government must establish a biennial engagement mechanism with parliamentarians, civil society, and academic experts to review and refine National Action Plan indicators and reporting. Existing data on women’s participation, lived experience, and programme impact must be 36 incorporated into the UK’s monitoring framework, enabling meaningful oversight and accountability of Women, Peace and Security implementation. (Recommendation, Paragraph 87)

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 20

Conclusion · 10th Report - Peace under pressure: Protecting Women, Peace and Security · Addressed to Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office

Concluded (the committee's words)
Given the Government’s stated commitment to meaningful engagement, we consider it to be disappointing that a copy of the National Action Plan has not been shared with us in advance of publication. Earlier sharing would have strengthened transparency and supported effective parliamentary scrutiny. (Conclusion, Paragraph 88)

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 21

Conclusion · 10th Report - Peace under pressure: Protecting Women, Peace and Security · Addressed to Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office

Concluded (the committee's words)
The Government has not allowed for sufficient external oversight and feedback on its Women, Peace and Security commitments. The shift from annual to biennial reporting has reduced opportunities for meaningful scrutiny. This weakens transparency and limits the ability of Parliament and civil society to assess whether commitments are delivering measurable improvements for women and girls. (Conclusion, Paragraph 94)

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 22

Conclusion · 10th Report - Peace under pressure: Protecting Women, Peace and Security · Addressed to Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office

Concluded (the committee's words)
Backing the Women, Peace and Security Private Member’s Bill would have been a significant demonstration of the Government’s commitments to the agenda. However, the Government has indicated that it does not yet support it. We are concerned about the future of Women, Peace and Security and the extent of the Government’s commitment and ability to deliver against National Action Plan objectives in the run up to the refresh. (Conclusion, Paragraph 95)

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 23

Recommendation · 10th Report - Peace under pressure: Protecting Women, Peace and Security · Addressed to Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office

Recommended (the committee's words)
The Government must reinstate annual reporting to Parliament on Women, Peace and Security implementation following the 2026 National Action Plan refresh and commit to reporting which integrates progress on Preventing Sexual Violence in Conflict, as set out in the Women, Peace and Security Bill. The Government must also review and reform the structure of engagement forums to strengthen opportunities for external scrutiny and accountability. (Recommendation, Paragraph 96) 37

Link to this item · Read this item

Reports

1 report

Oral evidence sessions

3 sessions

On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.

Date Session and witnesses Source
16 Dec 2025
Women, Peace and Security
Alistair Carns DSO OBE MC MP · Ministry of Defence, Chris Elmore MP · Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office, Emily Maltman · Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office, Stuart Mills · Ministry of Defence
View ↗
18 Nov 2025
Women, Peace and Security
Eva Tabbasam · Gender Action for Peace and Security (GAPS), Professor Toni Haastrup · The University of Manchester, Reem Alsalem · United Nations
View ↗
14 Oct 2025
Women, Peace and Security
Fawzia Koofi · Afghan Parliament, Fiona Kilpatrick-Cooper · The HALO Trust, Hanin Ahmed · Emergency Response Rooms, Sudan, Stephanie Siddall · Women for Women International, The Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon
View ↗

Who gave evidence

12 witnesses

On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.

WitnessOrganisationSessions
Alistair Carns DSO OBE MC MP · Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Minister for Veterans and People) Ministry of Defence 1
Chris Elmore MP · Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Multilateral, Human Rights, Latin America and the Caribbean Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office 1
Emily Maltman · Head of Gender and Children in Conflict Department Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office 1
Eva Tabbasam · Director Gender Action for Peace and Security (GAPS) 1
Fawzia Koofi · Former Deputy Speaker Afghan Parliament 1
Fiona Kilpatrick-Cooper · Director of Weapons and Ammunition Management The HALO Trust 1
Hanin Ahmed · Sudanese Activist and Emergency Response Room Leader Emergency Response Rooms, Sudan 1
Professor Toni Haastrup · Professor The University of Manchester 1
Reem Alsalem · Special rapporteur on violence against women and girls United Nations 1
Stephanie Siddall · Director of Global Policy and Advocacy Women for Women International 1
Stuart Mills · Head of Global Issues, Security Policy and Operations Directorate Ministry of Defence 1
The Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon Not recorded 1