Select committee: International Development Committee
Conclusion 17
10th Report - Peace under pressure: Protecting Women, Peace and Security
Published 23 Mar 2026
Addressed to Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
International Development Committee Women, peace and security All items in this report Report on parliament.uk ↗ Inquiry on parliament.uk ↗
Conclusion (the committee's words)
The lack of an operational Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning framework is not a technical issue but a practical barrier to accountability, oversight, and outcome–focused programming. Current reporting risks being activity– driven rather than impact–driven, undermining efforts to improve the lives of women and girls in conflict–affected contexts. Despite commitments in the National Action Plan, there is no integrated cross–government system for capturing and aggregating data on Women, Peace and Security activity, expenditure or impact, nor a consistently applied set of Women, Peace and Security–specific indicators. The absence of baseline data and an operational Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning framework at the midpoint of the National Action Plan cycle limits the ability of the Government and Parliament to assess whether interventions are delivering measurable improvements. In the context of Official Development Assistance cuts and reductions in staff and resourcing, this also represents poor value for money, as resources are not systematically tracked or assessed. (Conclusion, Paragraph 85)
From: International Development Committee, 10th Report - Peace under pressure: Protecting Women, Peace and Security (HC 782), 23 March 2026
Government response
The government responded to the whole report on 10 June 2026 (deadline 23 May 2026).
Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.The government's response is largely "Partially Agree" across the Committee's recommendations, restating its commitment to Women, Peace and Security while disagreeing with Recommendation 29 and agreeing only with Recommendation 86.
- On the Committee's request to explain why no dedicated Women, Peace and Security session was convened during the February 2026 Security Council Presidency (Recommendation 29), the government disagrees. It says inviting women to brief country-specific meetings "has proven more meaningful and impactful than holding generic discussions on WPS".
- On convening a dedicated session in a future Presidency (Recommendation 30), the government partially agrees. It says it "may decide that a dedicated WPS meeting is the best way to deliver this in a future Presidency but would not want to prejudge that at this stage".
- On monitoring (Recommendation 86), the government agrees. It says it is "reviewing the current monitoring and evaluation mechanism" as part of the 2026 National Action Plan refresh.
- On annual reporting to Parliament (Recommendation 96), the government partially agrees. It "will consider introducing annual reporting", notes that the plan commits to a biennial written report, and says the updated governance structure will be published in the 2026 refresh.