Select Committee · Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee

The finances and sustainability of the social housing sector

Status: Closed Opened: 28 Mar 2023 Closed: 28 May 2024 21 recommendations 13 conclusions 1 report

This inquiry seeks to examine the finances and sustainability of the social housing sector in England. In recent years the financial pressures for social landlords have increased as they face the demands of building new homes, retrofitting existing stock to improve energy efficiency, remediating stock with cladding and other building safety issues, and tackling issues …

Clear

Reports

1 report
Title HC No. Published Items Response
Sixth Report - The Finances and Sustainability of the Socia… HC 60 8 May 2024 34 Responded

Recommendations & Conclusions

11 items
1 Recommendation Sixth Report - The Finances and Sustain… Accepted

Publish annual assessment of social housing capacity and targets to deliver 90,000 new homes.

The problem of a continuing chronic shortage of social housing that we identified in our 2020 Report, Building More Social Housing, remains. In line with the conclusions of our 2020 report, we conclude that the Government must support, regulate and invest in the social housing sector so that the country …

Government response. The government agrees with the committee that providers face significant financial challenges and notes record investment in repairs and maintenance. It highlights its existing regulatory casework, where it has downgraded providers' governance judgements and worked with them to address failures …
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
2 Conclusion Sixth Report - The Finances and Sustain… Accepted

Financial pressures from costs, income, and Right to Buy challenge social housing stability.

The social housing sector as a whole remains relatively financially resilient. However, it does face the simultaneous financial pressures of higher costs and lower income. Despite the sector’s overall resilience this is a clear and direct challenge to individual social housing providers’ business models and financial stability that must be …

Government response. The government agrees on the importance of effective use of provider resources and outlines how existing Value for Money and new consumer standards, along with regulatory engagement, address this. It details how its value for money benchmarking tool and published …
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
6 Conclusion Sixth Report - The Finances and Sustain… Accepted

Necessary fire safety work imposes significant additional costs on social housing providers.

Necessary fire safety work has resulted in significant additional costs for social housing providers, as the Government has acknowledged in its written evidence.

Government response. The government describes existing regulatory standards and inspections by the Regulator of Social Housing (RSH) that ensure social housing providers have appropriate expertise and financial management capabilities to handle complex issues, without committing to new action regarding additional fire safety …
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
7 Conclusion Sixth Report - The Finances and Sustain… Accepted

Provide social housing providers with equal access to building safety remediation funds.

The Government’s focus on holding social housing providers responsible for remediating building safety work is producing an unhelpful disparity between the private and social housing sectors. There is no justification for private sector landlords to be treated more favourably. We once again reiterate the recommendation from our 2020 Report, The …

Government response. The government details how the Regulator of Social Housing (RSH) already monitors the financial health of providers and intervenes in cases of financial difficulty, stating it has sufficient powers. It does not commit to providing social housing providers with equal …
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
9 Recommendation Sixth Report - The Finances and Sustain… Accepted

Encourage registered housing providers to deploy reserves for property remediation and regeneration.

The ultimate responsibility for ensuring that existing and future social housing is fit for habitation lies with the housing providers. Those housing providers facing the highest maintenance costs may not be the most financially resilient. Nonetheless, where registered housing providers have homes that require major improvements and significant reserves, the …

Government response. The government agrees that providers must manage resources effectively and outlines the Regulator's existing processes for oversight. It states the Regulator ensures providers have plans in place for stock improvements, citing examples where governance judgments were downgraded due to maintenance …
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
11 Recommendation Sixth Report - The Finances and Sustain… Accepted

Strengthen consumer standards to ensure providers act on tenants' regeneration views.

We welcome the Regulator’s efforts to ensure that regeneration projects are properly explained to tenants, and that tenants have had some opportunity to share their views. However, we believe the Regulator must go further to ensure registered providers not only listen to, but appropriately act on, tenants’ views, by considering …

Government response. The government agrees on the importance of providers listening and acting on tenant views in regeneration projects, stating that existing Governance and Financial Viability, and Transparency, Influence and Accountability Standards already set clear expectations for providers and are monitored during …
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
14 Conclusion Sixth Report - The Finances and Sustain… Accepted

Require housing associations to consider rent increase impact on vulnerable tenants and use reserves.

We remain very concerned about the impact of rent increases on social housing tenants. These are some of the most financially vulnerable people in our society. We believe housing associations must bear this in mind when they are setting rent levels, and reflect on the levels of their reserves they …

Government response. The government agrees on the importance of providers' effective use of resources and responsibility to tenants, stating that existing Value for Money and new consumer standards, along with regulatory engagement and benchmarking tools, already ensure landlords consider rent levels and …
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
15 Recommendation Sixth Report - The Finances and Sustain… Accepted

Proactively assess registered providers' reserve use for governance, value for money, and tenant responsiveness.

Social housing providers should involve their tenants in discussions about rent levels. When rent rises are being considered providers should explain to residents why such rises may be necessary. The Regulator should proactively assess how registered providers use their reserves not only as an indication of financial viability, but also …

Government response. The government agrees that providers should involve tenants and that the Regulator should assess resource use, stating that existing Value for Money and new consumer standards already cover these aspects through regulatory engagement, published measures, and governance judgements.
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
18 Conclusion Sixth Report - The Finances and Sustain… Accepted

New for-profit financing models offer investment potential but require careful and effective regulation.

The for-profit financial models involved in social housing are evolving and can be more complicated than traditional financing models. However, we are optimistic that new financing models have some role to play in generating the investment that the sector as a whole needs, although these new models do need careful …

Government response. The government agrees on the importance of understanding and scrutinizing the for-profit sector, detailing how it has recruited expert staff, engages with advisors, conducts audits, and has a 2024-25 priority to review knowledge of for-profit providers, thereby addressing the need …
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
19 Recommendation Sixth Report - The Finances and Sustain… Accepted

Regulator must continuously improve understanding and scrutiny of evolving social housing financing models.

We are pleased that the Regulator has taken steps to ensure that it has the adequate skills and resources which are required for it to have an effective understanding and scrutiny of the new financing models emerging in the sector, particularly equity investment and for-profit registered providers. Nonetheless, for the …

Government response. The government accepts the need for continuous improvement, detailing current efforts in recruiting specialist staff, engaging advisors, and conducting internal audits, along with a planned 2024-25 review of knowledge and development for for-profit providers.
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
21 Recommendation Sixth Report - The Finances and Sustain… Accepted

Ensure registered providers' boards and executives possess sufficient expertise in their financial models.

Furthermore, the Regulator must ensure that, as part of its governance ratings, it examines whether registered providers’ boards and executive teams have individuals with sufficient expertise in the financial models the provider is using. Registered providers must demonstrate that they properly understand any capital markets and financial products they are …

Government response. The government welcomes the recognition of expertise importance, stating that its existing Governance and Financial Viability Standard and Code of Practice already set expectations for board capability and expertise, which are examined during regulatory inspections and inform governance gradings.
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government

Oral evidence sessions

4 sessions
Date Witnesses
22 Jan 2024 Bernadette Conroy · Regulator of Social Housing, Jonathan Walters · Regulator of Social Housing, Peter Denton · Homes England, Shahi Islam · Homes England, The Baroness Scott of Bybrook OBE · Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities View ↗
11 Sep 2023 Dave Meseck · DMG Eco, Felix Ejgel · S&P Global Ratings, Gemma Bourne · Big Society Capital, Neil Brown · Inclusion Group, Simon Century · Legal and General, Steve Collins · Rentplus-UK View ↗
19 Jun 2023 Conrad Hall · Newham Council, Councillor Pippa Heylings · Local Government Association, Deborah Heenan · Populo, Jamie Kellett · abrdn, John Marr · UK Finance, Kathryn Jones · Dudley Council, Michael Scorer · Southwark Council, Piers Williamson · The Housing Finance Corporation View ↗
12 Jun 2023 Fiona Fletcher Smith · G15, James Prestwich · Chartered Institute of Housing, Kate Henderson · National Housing Federation, Kate Wareing · Soha Housing, Paul Fiddaman · Karbon Homes, Professor Tony Crook · University of Sheffield View ↗

Correspondence

7 letters
DateDirectionTitle
17 Jan 2024 To cttee Letter from Minister Rowley to the Chair dated 16 January 2024 concerning givin…
17 Jan 2024 To cttee Letter from the Chair to the Housing Minister dated 15 January 2024 concerning …
13 Dec 2023 To cttee Letter from the Chair to the Housing Minister dated 5 December 2023 concerning …
8 Nov 2023 To cttee Letter from Rentplus concerning follow-up from the Committee’s session on 11 Se…
12 Sep 2023 To cttee Letter from Sage Homes to the Chair dated 24 July 2023 concerning finances of s…
12 Sep 2023 To cttee Letter from National Housing Federation, G15, Karbon Homes and Soha Housing to …
27 Jun 2023 To cttee Letter from Rentplus to the Chair dated 21 June 2023 concerning the Rent to Buy…