Recommendations & Conclusions
6 items
10
Conclusion
Fifth Report - Reforming the Private Re…
Rejected
We are concerned that detached private rented homes with a floor space under 50 square metres are exempt from the MEES, although it is unclear how many homes fall into this category.
Government response AI summary
The government has scrapped proposals to require landlords to meet EPC C from 2025 in their private rented properties; landlords can still take advantage of government-backed schemes to improve energy efficiency but at a time that suits them.
Read full response →
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
11
Recommendation
Fifth Report - Reforming the Private Re…
Rejected
Given the importance of the MEES to the Government’s net zero strategy, not to mention the health, cost and other benefits of living in a warm home, we recommend that the MEES be incorporated into criterion D and that the Government come up with financing solutions for PRS landlords for …
Read more
Given the importance of the MEES to the Government’s net zero strategy, not to mention the health, cost and other benefits of living in a warm home, we recommend that the MEES be incorporated into criterion D and that the Government come up with financing solutions for PRS landlords for whom the cost of the necessary improvement works would exceed the £10,000 cap. We also recommend that the Government determine the number of homes in the PRS exempt from the MEES by virtue of having a total floor space under 50 square metres and then consider the possible merits of legislating to revoke this exemption.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government scrapped proposals to require landlords to meet EPC C from 2025, stating landlords can still use government-backed schemes to improve energy efficiency at a time that suits them.
Read full response →
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
24
Conclusion
Fifth Report - Reforming the Private Re…
Rejected
Tenants and landlords need access to reliable data on local market rents in comparable properties. The closest available data appears to be that held by the Valuation Office Agency (VOA), which is used to determined local housing allowance rates for broad market rental areas. If sufficiently accurate and granular, this …
Read more
Tenants and landlords need access to reliable data on local market rents in comparable properties. The closest available data appears to be that held by the Valuation Office Agency (VOA), which is used to determined local housing allowance rates for broad market rental areas. If sufficiently accurate and granular, this data could form the basis of a much more efficient system for ensuring justified rent increases. Either the data could be made publicly available or the VOA could be given initial responsibility for determining whether a rent increase is justified. Its decision could then be appealed to the tribunal.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government rejects intervening in rent setting and states the First-Tier Tribunal is best placed to resolve disputes, and it will update guidance to support engagement with the Tribunal.
Read full response →
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
25
Recommendation
Fifth Report - Reforming the Private Re…
Rejected
The Government should assess whether the data held by the VOA could be used to determine justified rent increases in the PRS. If it concludes that it could, we recommend either that this information be made public so that landlords and tenants can easily see what a justified rent increase …
Read more
The Government should assess whether the data held by the VOA could be used to determine justified rent increases in the PRS. If it concludes that it could, we recommend either that this information be made public so that landlords and tenants can easily see what a justified rent increase would be or, if it cannot be, that the VOA be given initial responsibility for determining whether an increase is justified, with the tribunal serving as an appeals court. If the Government determines that the data is not suitable for this purpose, it should consider ways of collecting it. One way might be for it to require landlords to declare rent levels through the property portal. Whatever the Government chooses to do, it should explore alternative mechanisms to those currently used for establishing justified rent increases with a view to removing some of the burden from landlords and tenants themselves.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government rejects intervening in rent setting and states the First-Tier Tribunal is best placed to resolve disputes, and it will update guidance to support engagement with the Tribunal.
Read full response →
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
26
Recommendation
Fifth Report - Reforming the Private Re…
Rejected
By getting rid of rent review clauses, the Government could be removing a mechanism for predictable and fair rent rises and replacing it with a system that relies on a resource-intensive and time-consuming appeals process. We recommend Reforming the Private Rented Sector 63 that the Government not abolish rent review …
Read more
By getting rid of rent review clauses, the Government could be removing a mechanism for predictable and fair rent rises and replacing it with a system that relies on a resource-intensive and time-consuming appeals process. We recommend Reforming the Private Rented Sector 63 that the Government not abolish rent review clauses but make it a requirement that they stipulate by how much rents will increase. It should also legislate to require all rent review clauses to include break periods during which tenants may appeal to the First-tier Property Tribunal if they think their rent has risen above local market rents. (Paragraph 129) Miscellaneous
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government will not abolish rent review clauses, but states that landlords can increase rents once a year and tenants can challenge this at the First-tier Tribunal if they think it is above market levels. It will not set or steer rent increases.
Read full response →
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
29
Recommendation
Fifth Report - Reforming the Private Re…
Rejected
The proposal to make it easier for landlords to allow pets by making pet insurance a permitted payment under the Tenant Fees Act 2019 is a sensible and proportionate measure that could make a meaningful difference. On the other hand, the proposal to make it illegal for landlords to unreasonably …
Read more
The proposal to make it easier for landlords to allow pets by making pet insurance a permitted payment under the Tenant Fees Act 2019 is a sensible and proportionate measure that could make a meaningful difference. On the other hand, the proposal to make it illegal for landlords to unreasonably withhold consent from those who request permission to have a pet seems impractical, even if a satisfactory definition of “unreasonably withholding consent” could be produced. We recommend that the Government abandon their promise to legislate to make it illegal to unreasonably withhold consent when a tenant requests permission to have a pet. If it cannot accept this recommendation, it should set out in response to this report what would constitute “unreasonably withholding consent” and explain in what circumstances it would be acceptable to force landlords to accept pets, especially where those landlords have had previous negative experiences of tenants with pets.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government disagrees with abandoning the proposal to strengthen tenants' rights to request to keep a pet, stating landlords can refuse animals if it is reasonable, taking into account factors like the size of the pet and property.
Read full response →
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government