We repeat our previous calls for further mental health support for those affected by the...
We repeat our previous calls for further mental health support for those affected by the building safety crisis.
The purpose of this inquiry is to examine the effectiveness and impact of the Government’s planned measures to make developers and industry cover the costs of remediation, to scrutinise whether the Secretary of State’s approach goes far enough to finally fix this crisis, and to examine what the funding arrangement to be agreed with industry …
| Title | HC No. | Published | Items | Response |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seventh Report - Building Safety: Remediation and Funding | HC 1063 | 11 Mar 2022 | 21 | Responded |
We repeat our previous calls for further mental health support for those affected by the building safety crisis.
In the absence of PAS-79 guidance which was withdrawn in August 2021, it is imperative that the British Standards Institute publish its new standard as soon as possible. We urge the Government to report on its consultation on Personal Emergency Evacuation Plans at the earliest opportunity. (Paragraph 6) Protecting leaseholders …
The Secretary of State said the Government would protect leaseholders from remediation costs, but too many leaseholders will fall through the cracks of the Government’s piecemeal measures. As the Government’s proposals currently stand, the only leaseholders who will not pay for building safety remediation are those who have already not …
Leaseholders are no more to blame for non-cladding defects than they are for faulty cladding on homes they bought in good faith. Buy-to-let landlords are no more to blame than other leaseholders for historic building safety defects, and landing them with potentially unaffordable bills will only slow down or prevent …
Our longstanding view is that leaseholders should not pay a penny to rectify faults not of their doing and to make their homes safe. The amendments tabled to the Building Safety Bill show that the Government does not share that view. The Government should scrap the cap on non-cladding costs …
We do not agree with the Government’s proposal that only buy-to-let landlords with one other property should be included in the statutory protections for leaseholders. Should the Government continue to treat buy-to-let landlords differently to other leaseholders there are other options available to exclude wealthy property tycoons from the protections …
Our preferred option would be for the Government to table amendments to the Building Safety Bill to ensure that all leaseholders in buildings of any height have statutory protection from future costs for remediating historic building safety defects, both cladding and non-cladding.
Instead of its piecemeal method of funding remediation according to building height and type of defect, the Government should implement our previously recommended Comprehensive Building Safety Fund. The fund should cover the costs of remediating all building safety defects on buildings of any height where the original “polluter(s)” cannot be …
It is completely unacceptable that, nearly five years after the Grenfell tragedy, the Government still does not seem to know how many buildings have unsafe cladding or other historic building safety defects. We commend the Secretary of State for finally seeking information from developers and manufacturers, and commend industry for …
We commend the Government for finally taking action to require industry players to remediate and pay for faults of their own doing, and we commend those organisations who have already done so. However, developers and manufacturers are not the only sectors that contributed to the building safety crisis, and we …
Governments share responsibility for the building safety crisis on account of their regulatory failings. Everyone involved would instantly have more funds to spend on remediation if the Government played its part by removing VAT on building safety activity, which would enable homes to be made safer. The Government should remove …
While insurance premiums for leaseholders have gone up, buildings have become safer as a result of remediation works that have been carried out. The risk to insurers has reduced as a result. Insurers should be required to contribute to funds for remediation as they covered the actions of developers who …
Product manufacturers found to have been criminally responsible for defective products extending back 30 years must be legally required to automatically replace faulty materials free of charge, including compensating others who have already paid to replace the materials in question.
The Government rightly proposes to take strong action against UK firms, however its options against overseas firms who have also contributed to the building safety crisis are more limited. The Secretary of State told us that to reveal its options would be showing too much of the Government’s hand. The …
As they stand, the Government’s proposals create a bizarre lucky dip in which some leaseholders may see their costs capped at £10,000 (£15,000 in London); some, because they have not yet paid for cladding remediation, may pay nothing at all; and others, who have already paid for cladding remediation, will …
The Government should table new amendments to the Building Safety Bill to ensure that, where the “polluter(s)” still exist, industry players must compensate leaseholders for remediation and interim costs already paid out and must pay for works that have been started or specified. In line with principles already set out …
The Government must stop pitting the building safety crisis against the housing crisis. Without access to funds for remediation where social tenants live, residents of social housing are paying the price through the diversion of funds from maintaining their homes and other vital services provided by housing associations and councils. …
Social housing providers must be exempt from the Building Safety Levy and any other taxes or levies connected to building safety remediation. Social housing providers must be exempt from requirements to fund and undertake necessary remediation on buildings they played a role in developing where they were the customer of …
The Government must commit to protecting the Affordable Homes Programme at its current level should it fail to recover sufficient funds from industry. (Paragraph 51) Guidance on building safety
Given that the introduction of the PAS 9980 will not result in the elimination of EWS1 forms, we remain concerned that uncertainty will remain about the safety of buildings and will continue to stymie those trying to sell their homes. We welcome the work being done with lenders to try …
The evidence we received clearly indicates that it should be the regulator—and not building owners—who decides whether a building needs a fire risk assessment. As such, we recommend that the Building Safety Regulator decides whether a building needs a fire risk assessment; sets the standard that a building need to …
| Date | Witnesses | |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Feb 2022 | Rt Hon Michael Gove · Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities | View ↗ |
| 2 Feb 2022 | Charles Roe · UK Finance, Cllr Rachel Blake · Local Government Association, Geeta Nada · Metropolitan Thames Valley, James Dalton · Association of British Insurers (ABI), Kate Henderson · National Housing Federation, Richard Collins · Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) | View ↗ |
| 31 Jan 2022 | Andrew Bulmer · Institute of Residential Property Management, Ben Beadle · National Residential Landlords Association, Ben Beadle · National Residential Landlords' Association, David O'Leary · Home Builders Federation, John Mulryan · Ballymore, Liam Spender · UK Cladding Action Group, Peter Caplehorn · Construction Products Association | View ↗ |
| Date | Direction | Title |
|---|---|---|
| 17 May 2022 | To cttee | Letter from the Secretary of State to the Chair dated 7 May 2022 concerning bui… |
| 22 Mar 2022 | To cttee | Letter from the Chair to the Association of British Insurers dated 22 March 202… |
| 9 Mar 2022 | To cttee | Letter from the Association of British Insurers to the Chair dated 8 March 2022… |
| 8 Mar 2022 | To cttee | Letter from the British Standards Institution dated 2 March 2022 concerning the… |
| 8 Mar 2022 | To cttee | Letter from G15 to the Chair dated 4 March 2022 following up evidence given bef… |
| 1 Mar 2022 | To cttee | Letter from the National Residential Landlords Association to the Chair dated 2… |
| 1 Mar 2022 | To cttee | Letter from the Construction Products Association to the Chair dated 17 Februar… |
| 22 Feb 2022 | To cttee | Letter from Ballymore to the Chair dated 11 February 2022 concerning evidence g… |
| 22 Feb 2022 | To cttee | Letter from the Secretary of State to the Chair dated 21 February 2022 concerni… |
| 22 Feb 2022 | To cttee | Letter from the Home Builders Federation to the Chair dated 16 February 2022 co… |