Source · Select Committees · Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee

Recommendation 15

15 Paragraph: 39

As they stand, the Government’s proposals create a bizarre lucky dip in which some leaseholders...

Recommendation
As they stand, the Government’s proposals create a bizarre lucky dip in which some leaseholders may see their costs capped at £10,000 (£15,000 in London); some, because they have not yet paid for cladding remediation, may pay nothing at all; and others, who have already paid for cladding remediation, will have paid well in excess of the proposed non-cladding cap. Leaseholders who have already paid for remediation and other interim measures to make their homes safe are no more responsible for the crisis than leaseholders who will now be protected in law from such costs. The Government should collect and publish data on the costs paid out by leaseholders since the Grenfell fire and the costs that leaseholders have not yet been billed for. It would have had to collect data on the amount paid out for its proposed cap on non-cladding costs, so the administrative burden is not a reason not to.
Paragraph Reference: 39
Government Response

A response document is linked to this report, dated 17 May 2022. Response attribution to this recommendation has not been verified. Read the response document ↗