Recommendations & Conclusions
5 items
1
Recommendation
Second Report - Local authority financi…
Accepted
The failure to properly fund children’s and adult social care, especially adult social care, is the single biggest threat facing local government financial resilience. Given that the cost of providing social care consumes between 60% and 70% of the budgets of top-tier councils, a solution to this funding crisis alone …
Read more
The failure to properly fund children’s and adult social care, especially adult social care, is the single biggest threat facing local government financial resilience. Given that the cost of providing social care consumes between 60% and 70% of the budgets of top-tier councils, a solution to this funding crisis alone could largely restore local government finances. The Government’s current policy of effectively forcing local councils to impose successive above-inflation council tax rises is imposing additional burdens on council tax payers. It is disappointing that the recent Queen’s Speech made so little mention of plans to reform social care funding. We are also concerned about the cuts to more discretionary services arising from councils’ need to prioritise social care provision. We recommend that the Government urgently reform the funding of social care in England. (Paragraph 13) Funding
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government has committed to investing an additional £5.4 billion over three years, following a 7 September 2021 announcement, to begin a comprehensive programme of reform for adult social care. Further details will be published in a White Paper later this year.
Read full response →
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
12
Conclusion
Second Report - Local authority financi…
Accepted
The Government deserves credit for having responded to an unprecedented crisis with significant emergency funding that, from a national perspective, broadly covers all the additional financial pressures consequent on the pandemic and lockdowns in 2021–22. The effects of the pandemic will be felt for many years, however, and we are …
Read more
The Government deserves credit for having responded to an unprecedented crisis with significant emergency funding that, from a national perspective, broadly covers all the additional financial pressures consequent on the pandemic and lockdowns in 2021–22. The effects of the pandemic will be felt for many years, however, and we are concerned that the Government has not committed to covering costs arising in future years, including from lost council tax and business rates. We are concerned, too, that some local authorities have been worse hit than others, particularly shire districts, and that some of these councils, even with the additional government funding, will still be left out of pocket. The disproportionate impact on local authorities will not assist the Government’s levelling up agenda.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government highlighted over £12 billion in funding already committed to councils, stating that allocations are based on need and that it continues to monitor local authority finances to inform the ongoing Spending Review and support individual authorities.
Read full response →
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
14
Conclusion
Second Report - Local authority financi…
Accepted
Commercial investment appears to pose no clear threat to local government financial resilience overall, and where it has contributed to financial instability, the councils concerned must bear ultimate responsibility. We also welcome the Government’s reforms to the PWLB’s lending terms, which are a useful clarification of the purposes for which …
Read more
Commercial investment appears to pose no clear threat to local government financial resilience overall, and where it has contributed to financial instability, the councils concerned must bear ultimate responsibility. We also welcome the Government’s reforms to the PWLB’s lending terms, which are a useful clarification of the purposes for which PWLB loans can be used. In understanding local authorities’ use of commercial investment, we must acknowledge that previous Governments encouraged councils to be more commercial.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government is strengthening the capital system and Prudential Framework by working with CIPFA to amend statutory codes, with planned implementation from April 2022, and by tightening legislation on Minimum Revenue Provision duty and borrowing capping powers.
Read full response →
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
18
Recommendation
Second Report - Local authority financi…
Accepted
We recommend the Government remove the ability of local authorities to choose their own auditors. The risk is that auditors will be reluctant to flag up potential problems for fear of losing their contract. The Government should consider who will be best placed to appoint local authority auditors, given that …
Read more
We recommend the Government remove the ability of local authorities to choose their own auditors. The risk is that auditors will be reluctant to flag up potential problems for fear of losing their contract. The Government should consider who will be best placed to appoint local authority auditors, given that it should not be local authorities themselves, and ARGA doing so could lead to a conflict of interest. We also ask the Government to confirm that the new system leader will be able to join up individual auditor findings with a view to identifying systemic issues across local government. Without a central body responsible for oversight of the sector, we see no way of ensuring a robust and transparent regime of local audit.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government has confirmed its intention to establish the Audit, Reporting and Governance Authority (ARGA) as the new system leader for local audit and considers the Public Sector Auditor Appointments Ltd (PSAA) as the best placed appointing body. It has also undertaken a consultation on …
Read full response →
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
20
Recommendation
Second Report - Local authority financi…
Accepted
We recommend that the Government consider changing the section 114 regime to provide Chief Finance Officers with intermediary measures that can be applied at a much earlier stage to highlight concerns before a council’s finances deteriorate so far as to require a section 114 notice. We also recommend that Chief …
Read more
We recommend that the Government consider changing the section 114 regime to provide Chief Finance Officers with intermediary measures that can be applied at a much earlier stage to highlight concerns before a council’s finances deteriorate so far as to require a section 114 notice. We also recommend that Chief Finance Officers report to both the Executive and appropriate scrutiny committees on a quarterly basis on the state of local authority finances and, in particular, draw attention to potential serious financial problems. (Paragraph 90) Local authority financial sustainability and the section 114 regime 43
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government defends the existing Section 114 regime as effective and states that a wider system of checks and balances, including statutory reporting duties for Section 151 Officers and powers for external auditors, already provides mechanisms to highlight financial concerns.
Read full response →
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government