Recommendations & Conclusions
7 items
10
Recommendation
Fourth Report - Progress on devolution …
Not Addressed
The Committee has persistently sought clarity from the Government about how the UK Shared Prosperity Fund will work. The Government has had over four years to design and bring forward a coherent alternative to the European Development Funds that will completely end in 2023. This delay has been unacceptable and …
Read more
The Committee has persistently sought clarity from the Government about how the UK Shared Prosperity Fund will work. The Government has had over four years to design and bring forward a coherent alternative to the European Development Funds that will completely end in 2023. This delay has been unacceptable and requires an accelerated approach. The Government should bring forward as soon as possible its proposals for how the UK Shared Prosperity Fund will work, including the funding profile to be controlled by combined authorities or local authorities. The majority of the funding should be allocated as block grants with local and combined authorities empowered to allocate the funds within the general principles of bolstering regeneration and tackling unemployment and skill shortages already announced by the Government. The Government should confirm that the £1.5 billion, equivalent to that formerly provided by the EU, will be increased to retain its real value over time. It should also increase the total amount of funding for the UK Shared Prosperity Fund to ensure that English regions that would have been eligible for greater sums of structural funding had the UK stayed in the EU and if the Government had strictly followed the EU’s former allocation of funds do not lose out by its guarantee to retain the existing amounts of funding for other parts of the UK.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government's response is an exact repetition of the recommendation text, providing no substantive reply to the committee's proposals regarding the UK Shared Prosperity Fund.
Read full response →
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
11
Recommendation
Fourth Report - Progress on devolution …
Not Addressed
A sustainable approach to local government funding requires longer term budgetary arrangements and discretion for local authorities and combined authorities over how to spend. We therefore welcome that the 2021 spending review will be multi- year. This reflects the wider need for a long-term plan to support the finances of …
Read more
A sustainable approach to local government funding requires longer term budgetary arrangements and discretion for local authorities and combined authorities over how to spend. We therefore welcome that the 2021 spending review will be multi- year. This reflects the wider need for a long-term plan to support the finances of local government. We recommend that the principle of devolution funding should be that grants are given on a block basis to cover all services of which local and combined authorities have oversight, without ringfencing or competitive bidding. (Paragraph 87) Devolution of other powers
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government's response is an exact repetition of the recommendation text, providing no substantive reply to the committee's proposal for block grants and an end to ringfencing and competitive bidding.
Read full response →
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
12
Recommendation
Fourth Report - Progress on devolution …
Not Addressed
We retain our predecessor committee’s scepticism about whether health devolution accurately describes the current arrangements in Greater Manchester. It clearly does not in Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly. We support the recommendations of the Health Devolution Commission on the future of health devolution and the role that should be …
Read more
We retain our predecessor committee’s scepticism about whether health devolution accurately describes the current arrangements in Greater Manchester. It clearly does not in Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly. We support the recommendations of the Health Devolution Commission on the future of health devolution and the role that should be played by local and combined authorities in the new Integrated Care System. The Government should seek to implement these proposals. It should also explore the merits of establishing a London Health Commissioner to oversee all London health matters, and of devolving the London Ambulance Service.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government's response discusses the devolution of the adult education budget and the Department for Education's functions, completely failing to address the original recommendation regarding health devolution and a London Health Commissioner.
Read full response →
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
13
Recommendation
Fourth Report - Progress on devolution …
Not Addressed
The devolution of the adult education budget should be part of the devolution framework, accompanied by transitional support and measures to mitigate differences in course options between areas. The same powers over adult education should be available to all areas with devolution deals. Further education, in particular FE colleges, should …
Read more
The devolution of the adult education budget should be part of the devolution framework, accompanied by transitional support and measures to mitigate differences in course options between areas. The same powers over adult education should be available to all areas with devolution deals. Further education, in particular FE colleges, should also be included in the framework. The Government should work with the Local Government Association to agree proposals as to how local authorities’ oversight of schools and their funding should be strengthened. This should include devolving the functions of the Education and Skills Funding Agency to county councils and combined authorities; and the transfer of the powers held by Regional School Commissioners to local authorities. (Paragraph 108) Progress on devolution in England 65
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government's response discusses housing and planning powers, Mayoral Development Corporations, and streamlining funding, completely failing to address the recommendation regarding the devolution of the adult education budget, FE colleges, or strengthening local authority oversight of schools.
Read full response →
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
14
Recommendation
Fourth Report - Progress on devolution …
Not Addressed
The devolution framework should provide for the devolution to combined and local authorities of the spatial planning powers, call-in powers for planning applications, the powers to establish development corporations, compulsory purchase orders, consultation on strategic planning applications, and strategic infrastructure levies, currently exercised by some combined authorities. There should be …
Read more
The devolution framework should provide for the devolution to combined and local authorities of the spatial planning powers, call-in powers for planning applications, the powers to establish development corporations, compulsory purchase orders, consultation on strategic planning applications, and strategic infrastructure levies, currently exercised by some combined authorities. There should be greater transparency about the process. The Government should also consider further devolution of housing powers to London. There should there be a single pot for housing, with a requirement that a spatial plan be adopted beforehand.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government's response focuses entirely on transport systems, bus services, Network Rail, and the new Great British Railways, failing to address the recommendation for devolving spatial planning powers, housing powers, development corporations, or strategic infrastructure levies.
Read full response →
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
15
Recommendation
Fourth Report - Progress on devolution …
Not Addressed
The Government should consider the case for extending powers for Transport for London-style oversight of local buses to all transport authorities, whether combined or local authorities. Where transport services cross local authority boundaries, joint working relationships should be encouraged between the local authorities affected. Similarly, Network Rail, Highways England and …
Read more
The Government should consider the case for extending powers for Transport for London-style oversight of local buses to all transport authorities, whether combined or local authorities. Where transport services cross local authority boundaries, joint working relationships should be encouraged between the local authorities affected. Similarly, Network Rail, Highways England and other comparable bodies should be required to organise joint working arrangements with transport authorities. Local government should ensure there is proper and transparent scrutiny of transport arrangements in their areas.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government's response focuses on local authorities' role in net zero, climate action plans, Local Nature Recovery Strategies, and public asset takeovers, completely failing to address the recommendation regarding Transport for London-style oversight for buses, joint working arrangements for transport services, or scrutiny of transport.
Read full response →
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
16
Recommendation
Fourth Report - Progress on devolution …
Not Addressed
We have heard, both in this inquiry and our inquiry into local government and the path to net-zero, that local government can play an important role in policies relating to energy efficiency. The Government should strongly consider the case for devolution of further powers in this area. It should also …
Read more
We have heard, both in this inquiry and our inquiry into local government and the path to net-zero, that local government can play an important role in policies relating to energy efficiency. The Government should strongly consider the case for devolution of further powers in this area. It should also examine how additional oversight can be given to local government of the environment, aspects of farming and forestry policies, and the takeover of public assets. (Paragraph 121) Widening the geography of devolution
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government's response discusses the flexible approach to devolution through County Deals and the role of directly elected leaders or alternative governance models, but it does not address the specific recommendation to consider devolving powers related to energy efficiency, the environment, farming and forestry policies, …
Read full response →
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government