Recommendations & Conclusions
5 items
1
Conclusion
Fifth Report - Refreshing our approach?…
Acknowledged
The Integrated Review has provided a robust and flexible framework to guide UK foreign policy decisions out to 2025. The Russian invasion of Ukraine has tested many of the assumptions underpinning the IR, and these have been found to hold true. A full-scale refresh is only warranted, given the scale …
Read more
The Integrated Review has provided a robust and flexible framework to guide UK foreign policy decisions out to 2025. The Russian invasion of Ukraine has tested many of the assumptions underpinning the IR, and these have been found to hold true. A full-scale refresh is only warranted, given the scale of resources and time required to complete it, particularly at this exceptionally challenging time for Britain’s foreign and security policy, if the Government makes considerable changes or is prepared to fill in some of the gaps in more detail to justify this use of resources. Enhancing the resilience of the United Kingdom should be central to the refresh.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the committee's conclusion, stating that IR2023 updates the UK’s priorities to reflect the changes in the global context and that the resilience of the United Kingdom is central to IR2023.
Read full response →
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
5
Conclusion
Fifth Report - Refreshing our approach?…
Acknowledged
The Integrated Review notably lacked detail on the future of the UK’s relationship with its European partners and the EU. The renewed illegal invasion of Ukraine has altered the dynamics of European politics and provided a clearer lens through which to view UK-Europe security relations. It is important that the …
Read more
The Integrated Review notably lacked detail on the future of the UK’s relationship with its European partners and the EU. The renewed illegal invasion of Ukraine has altered the dynamics of European politics and provided a clearer lens through which to view UK-Europe security relations. It is important that the updated IR clarifies the nature of the UK’s security relationship with key European partners and the EU. We will be exploring further the extent to which this relationship should be formalised or institutionalised. (Paragraph 31) Balancing the Indo-Pacific and Euro-Atlantic
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government states that the UK’s overriding priority remains the Euro-Atlantic and is committed to playing a leading role in upholding its stability, security, and prosperity, building stronger relationships with European allies and partners.
Read full response →
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
6
Recommendation
Fifth Report - Refreshing our approach?…
Acknowledged
The Integrated Review was right to highlight the UK’s increasing interest in the Indo-Pacific. However, this refresh presents an opportunity to reset and clarify the UK’s relationships beyond the Indo-Pacific and specifically in the Euro-Atlantic. The Government should explain if, and how, it expects the UK to contribute to European …
Read more
The Integrated Review was right to highlight the UK’s increasing interest in the Indo-Pacific. However, this refresh presents an opportunity to reset and clarify the UK’s relationships beyond the Indo-Pacific and specifically in the Euro-Atlantic. The Government should explain if, and how, it expects the UK to contribute to European security while maintaining the Indo-Pacific tilt, particularly at a time of considerably constrained resources. The IR refresh should also explain in more detail what policy objective the Government hopes to deliver with the Indo-Pacific tilt, or work away from the term “tilt”, and set out what the benefits to the UK will be. (Paragraph 37) Filling the leadership vacuum in unstable regions
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government states that the Euro-Atlantic will remain the core priority and the security and prosperity of the Euro-Atlantic and Indo-Pacific are inextricably linked. It recognizes that it has now delivered the 'tilt' to the Indo-Pacific, making it a permanent pillar of the UK's international …
Read full response →
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
7
Recommendation
Fifth Report - Refreshing our approach?…
Acknowledged
The language of the Integrated Review and UK actions since its publication suggests that the Government is tilting away from the Middle East. We acknowledge the trade- offs involved in prioritising other regions but the Government should be careful to avoid any perception of disengagement from partners and fragile countries …
Read more
The language of the Integrated Review and UK actions since its publication suggests that the Government is tilting away from the Middle East. We acknowledge the trade- offs involved in prioritising other regions but the Government should be careful to avoid any perception of disengagement from partners and fragile countries so close in proximity to our own. Instability in MENA will threaten UK citizens at home. We urge the Government to confirm whether it intends to deprioritise the Middle East and if so, how it will continue to promote peace and stability in these regions with fewer resources.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government states that the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) is not being deprioritised and remains a critical region for the UK and will continue to promote peace and stability in these regions.
Read full response →
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
8
Recommendation
Fifth Report - Refreshing our approach?…
Acknowledged
The IR should detail how the Government will actively fight to make sure the multilateral system remains one reflective of our core values and the rules-based international order. That means advancing a forward-leaning multilateral foreign policy and putting forward our own candidates in coordination with likeminded nations for key roles. …
Read more
The IR should detail how the Government will actively fight to make sure the multilateral system remains one reflective of our core values and the rules-based international order. That means advancing a forward-leaning multilateral foreign policy and putting forward our own candidates in coordination with likeminded nations for key roles. (Paragraph 46) Refreshing our approach? Updating the Integrated Review 25
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges that traditional multilateral approaches and defending the 'rules-based international system' are no longer sufficient on their own, detailing diplomatic efforts regarding Russia and support for Ukraine in the multilateral system.
Read full response →
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office